INTEGRATIVE POTENTIAL AND INFORMATION EXCHANGE AS ANTECEDENTS OF JOINT BENEFIT IN NEGOTIATION DYADS
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Axelrod R., 1970, Conflict of interest
Bazerman M. H., 1983, M. H. Bazerman & R, 51
Follett M. P., 1942, H. C Metcalf & L, 30
Hammer W. C, 1975, Journal ofExperimental Social Psychology, 11, 329
Hicks C. R., 1973, Fundamental concepts in the design of experiments
Lewis S. A., Proceedings of the 79th Annual Convention of the American PsychologicalAssociation, 6, 221-222
McGrath J. E., 1966, Studies on behavior in organizations: A research symposium (pp. 101-134).
Pruitt D. G., 1981, Negotiation behavior
Pruitt, D. G. & Lewis, S. A. (1977). The psychology of integrative bargaining. In D. Druckman (Ed.),Negotiations: Social-psychologicalperspectives (pp.161-192). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Pruitt D. G., 1986, Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement
Putnam L. L., 1989, Managing conflict: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 121-144).
Roloff, M. E., Tutzauer, F. & Dailey, W. O. (1989). The role of argumentation in distributive and integrative bargaining contexts: Seeking relative advantage but at what cost? In M. A. Rahim (Ed.), Managing conflict:Aninterdisciplinary approach (pp.109-120). New York: Praeger.
Sen A. K., 1970, Collective choice and social welfare
Tutzauer F., 1987, Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 217-240).
Walker G. B., Argument and critical practices: Proceedings of the Fifth SCA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 299-308)
Walker W. L., 1971, Minnesota Law Review, 55, 1113
Walton R. E., 1965, A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: An analysis of a social interaction system
