IDENTIFYING INFLUENTIAL FACILITATORS OF MATHEMATICS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: A SURVEY ANALYSIS OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS
Tóm tắt
This paper builds on results from a previous phenomenological study examining characteristics of influential facilitators of elementary mathematics professional development. The current study utilized a survey design where results from the qualitative investigation were quantitized to develop an instrument that allowed participants to identify qualities of facilitators that are necessary to motivate teachers to be engaged in professional development sessions related to mathematics at the elementary level. This paper describes the instrument development process and results when implemented to a sample of teachers in the USA (n = 565). Findings from this research indicate that participants share the same perceptions of what it means to be an influential facilitator as participants from the phenomenological investigation of facilitator characteristics.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ball, D. L. & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is—or might be—the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6–8. 14.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K. & Gravemeijer, K. (2001). Participating in classroom mathematical practices. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 113–164.
Darling-Hammond, L. & Hammerness, K. (2005). The design of teacher education programs. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 390–441). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Davidson, E. S. (2008). Perceived continuing education needs and job relevance of health education competencies among health education and promotion practitioners in college in health settings. Journal of American College Health, 57(2), 197–209.
Dori, Y. J. & Herscovitz, O. (2005). Case-based long term professional development of science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27(12), 1413–1446.
Garcia, M., Sanchez, V. & Escudero, I. (2006). Learning through reflection in mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64, 1–17.
Garmston, R. J. & Wellman, B. M. (1992). How to make presentations that teach and transform. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Groth, R. E. & Bergner, J. A. (2007). Teachers’ perspectives on mathematics education research reports. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 809–825.
Hall, T. D. & Scott, R. (2007). Closing the gap between professors and teachers: “Uncoverage” as a model of professional development for history teachers. The History Teacher, 40(2), 257–263.
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B. & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 371–406.
Johnson, R. J. & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
Jones, P., West, E. & Stevens, D. (2006). Nurturing moments of transformation in teachers—comparative perspectives on the challenges of professional development. British Journal of Special Education, 33(2), 82–90.
Knight, J. (2009). Coaching: The key to translating research into practice lies in continuous, job-embedded learning with ongoing support. Journal of Staff Development, 30(1), 18–22.
Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F. & Swanson, R. A. (1998). The adult learner, the definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (5th ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf.
Linder, S. M. (2011). The facilitator’s role in elementary mathematics professional development. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13(4), 44–66.
McGatha, M. (2008). Levels of engagement in establishing coaching relationships. Teacher Development, 12(2), 139–150.
Merriam, S. B. (2001). Andragogy and self-directed learning: Pillars of adult learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 89, 3–13.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Nipper, K. & Sztajn, P. (2008). Expanding the instructional triangle: Conceptualizing mathematics teacher development. Journal of Math Teacher Education, 11, 333–341.
Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301–314.
Riley, D. A. & Roach, M. A. (2006). Helping teachers grow: Toward theory and practice of an ‘Emergent Curriculum’ model of staff development. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(5), 363–370.
Smith, M. S. (2001). Practice-based professional development for teachers of mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Sztajn, P., Hackenberg, A. J., White, D. Y. & Alexsaht-Snider, M. (2007). Mathematics professional development for elementary teachers: Building trust within a school-based mathematics education community. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 23(6), 970–984.
Watt, H. M. G. & Richardson, P. W. (2007). Motivational factors influencing teaching as a career choice: Development and validation of the FIT-Choice scale. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 167–202.
Weiss, I. R. & Pasley, J. D. (2006). Scaling up instructional improvement through teacher professional development: Insights from the local systemic change initiative. CPRE Policy Briefs. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W., Scarloss, B. & Shapley, K. L. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. Issues and answers. Washington, DC: Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest.