Hyperchoice and high prices: an unfair combination

Emerald - Tập 14 Số 7 - Trang 448-454 - 2005
SarahMaxwell1
1Fordham University, New York, New York, USA

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of the paper is to investigate the effect of the number of choices on judged fairness and willingness to purchase.Design/methodology/approachA survey‐based study was conducted with a between‐subject, two×five design having two levels of price ranges (high/low) and five levels of complexity (1, 3, 7, 11, and 21 choices). A total of 519 surveys were completed with a minimum of 42 respondents per cell.FindingsGreater choice initially has a positive effect on consumers' likelihood of purchase and their judgments of the fairness of the price. But too much choice has a negative effect, thereby creating an inverted “U” response curve. The effect of choice set size, however, is only triggered when combined with a high price. When the price is low, the number of choices has no effect on the judged fairness of the price and likelihood of purchase.Practical implicationsThe practical implication is that, although consumers like to have choices, there is no increased benefit to increasing the number of choices as long as the price is low. And there is a declining benefit from increasing the number when the price is high. Since there is a managerial cost to providing choices, it appears prudent to only provide between three and seven.Originality/valueThe value of the paper is in demonstrating that, although some choice is beneficial in overcoming the negative impact of a higher price, too many choices can be detrimental in causing confusion.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Adams, J.S. (1965), “Inequity in social exchange”, Annual Review of Sociology, Annual Reviews, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, pp. 267‐99.

Ajzen, I. (1982), “Equity in attitude formation and change”, in Greenberg, J. and Cohen, R.L. (Eds), Equity and Justice in Social Behavior, Academic Press, New York, NY.

Barrett‐Howard, E. and Tyler, T.R. (1986), “Procedural justice as a criterion in allocation decisions”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 50 No. 2, p. 296.

Bawa, K., Landwehr, J.T. and Krishna, A. (1989), “Consumer response to retailers' marketing environments: an analysis of coffee purchase data”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 65, Winter, pp. 471‐95.

Bolton, L.E., Warlop, L. and Alba, J.W. (2003), “Consumer perceptions of price (un)fairness”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 29, March, pp. 474‐91.

Campbell, M.C. (1999), “Perceptions of price unfairness: antecedents and consequences”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 36, May, pp. 187‐99.

Conover, W.J. (1998), Practical Nonparametric Statistics, 3rd ed., Wiley, New York, NY.

Desmeules, R. (2002), “The impact of variety on consumer happiness: marketing and the tyranny of freedom”, Academy of Marketing Science Review, Vol. 2002 No. 12, pp. 1‐20, available at: www.amsreview.org/articles/desmeules 12‐2002.pdf.

(The) Economist (2003), “What number? British consumers are oddly averse to much more choice in telecoms”, The Economist, 30 August, p. 40.

Edgell, S., Castellan, N.J., Roe, R., Barnes, J., Pak, N., Bight, R. and Ford, L. (1996), “Irrelevant information in probabilistic categorization”, Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 22 No. 6, pp. 1463‐81.

EMC (2001), Pricing Strategies for Mobile Content, EMC, Dorking.

Folger, R. and Martin, C. (1986), “Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: distributive and procedural justice effects”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 22 No. 6, pp. 531‐46.

Freidman, D. and Massaro, D. (1997), “Understanding variability in binary and continuous choice”, Psychological Bulletin Review, September 5, pp. 370‐89.

Heide, J.B. and John, G. (1992), “Do norms matter in marketing relationships?”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56, April, pp. 32‐44.

Heider, F. (1958), The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, Wiley, New York, NY.

Heiner, R.A. (1983), “The origin of predictable behavior”, American Economic Review, Vol. 73, pp. 560‐95.

Hirsch, F. (1976), The Social Limits to Growth, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

Homburg, C., Hoyer, W.D. and Koschate, N. (2005), “Customers' reactions to price increases: do customer satisfaction and perceived motive fairness matter?”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 36‐49.

Huppertz, J.W., Arenson, S.J. and Evans, R.H. (1978), “An application of equity theory to buyer‐seller exchange situations”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 15, May, pp. 250‐60.

Iyengar, S.W. and Lepper, M.R. (2000), “When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing?”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 79 No. 6, pp. 995‐1006.

Kahn, B. (1998), “Dynamic relationships with customers: high‐variety strategies”, Academy of Marketing Science Journal, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 45‐53.

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L. and Thaler, R.H. (1986), “Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: entitlements in the market”, American Economic Review, Vol. 76 No. 4, pp. 728‐41.

Kaufmann, P.J. and Stern, L.W. (1988), “Relational exchange norms, perceptions of unfairness, and retained hostility in commercial litigation”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 32, September, pp. 534‐52.

Keller, K.L. and Staelin, R. (1993), “Effects of quality and quantity information on decision effectiveness”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 14, September, pp. 200‐13.

Kim, W.C. and Mauborgne, R.A. (1991), “Implementing global strategies: the role of procedural justice”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, pp. 125‐43.

Kotler, G. and Armstrong, P. (2001), Principles of Marketing, 9th ed., Prentice‐Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Kumar, N., Scheer, L.K. and Steenkamp, J.E.M. (1995), “The effects of supplier fairness on vulnerable resellers”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 32, February, pp. 54‐65.

Lehmann, D. (1998), “Customer reactions to variety: too much of a good thing?”, Academy of Marketing Science Journal, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 62‐5.

Maier, M. (2002), “Wireless report: how much would you pay for advanced wireless?”, Business 2.0, 27 February, available at: www.business2.com/b2/web/articles .

Malhotra, N.K. (1982), “Information load and consumer decision making”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 8, March, pp. 419‐30.

March, J.G. (1978), “Bounded rationality, ambiguity and the engineering of choice”, Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 9, pp. 587‐608.

Maxwell, S. (2002), “Rule‐based price fairness and its effect on willingness to purchase”, Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 191‐212.

Mick, D.G., Broniarczyk, S.M. and Haidt, J. (2004), “Choose, choose, choose, choose, choose, choose, choose: emerging and prospective research on the deleterious effects of living in consumer hyperchoice”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 52 No. 2, pp. 207‐11.

Miller, G.A. (1956), “The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information”, Psychological Review, Vol. 63, pp. 81‐97.

Moon, T. (2002), “Find a top mobile deal with no strings attached”, The Express, 3 July, p. 37.

Quelch, J.A. and Kenny, D. (1994), “Extend profits, not product lines”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 72 No. 5, pp. 153‐60.

Rutte, C.G. and Messick, D.M. (1995), “An integrated model of perceived unfairness in organizations”, Social Justice Research, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 239‐61.

Schwartz, B. (2000), “Self‐determination: the tyranny of freedom”, American Psychologist, Vol. 55 No. 1, pp. 79‐88.

Schwartz, B. (2004), The Paradox of Choice, HarperCollins, New York, NY.

Simon, H. (1974), “How big is a chunk?”, Science, Vol. 183 No. 4124, pp. 482‐8.

Swait, J. and Adamowicz, W. (2001), “Choice environment, market complexity, and consumer behavior: a theoretical and empirical approach for incorporating decision complexity into models of consumer choice”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 86 No. 2, pp. 141‐67.

Thaler, R. (1985), “Mental accounting and consumer choice”, Marketing Science, Vol. 4, Summer, pp. 199‐214.

Thibaut, J.W. and Kelley, H.H. (1959), The Social Psychology of Groups, Wiley, New York, NY.

Tversky, A. and Shafir, E. (1992), “Choice under conflict: the dynamics of deferred decision”, Psychological Science, Vol. 3, pp. 359‐61.

Vaidyanathan, R. and Aggarwal, P. (2003), “Who is the fairest of them all? An attributional approach to price fairness perceptions”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 56 No. 6, pp. 453‐63.

Xia, L., Monroe, K.B. and Cox, J.L. (2004), “The price is unfair! A conceptual framework of price fairness perceptions”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 68, October, pp. 1‐15.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 14 Số 7

448-454

Thông tin tác giả