Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse
Tóm tắt
This paper addresses theoretical, empirical, and analytical studies pertaining to human use, misuse, disuse, and abuse of automation technology. Use refers to the voluntary activation or disengagement of automation by human operators. Trust, mental workload, and risk can influence automation use, but interactions between factors and large individual differences make prediction of automation use difficult. Misuse refers to over reliance on automation, which can result in failures of monitoring or decision biases. Factors affecting the monitoring of automation include workload, automation reliability and consistency, and the saliency of automation state indicators. Disuse, or the neglect or underutilization of automation, is commonly caused by alarms that activate falsely. This often occurs because the base rate of the condition to be detected is not considered in setting the trade-off between false alarms and omissions. Automation abuse, or the automation of functions by designers and implementation by managers without due regard for the consequences for human performance, tends to define the operator's roles as by-products of the automation. Automation abuse can also promote misuse and disuse of automation by human operators. Understanding the factors associated with each of these aspects of human use of automation can lead to improved system design, effective training methods, and judicious policies and procedures involving automation use.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abbott, T. S., 1990, A simulation evaluation of the engine monitoring and control display
Air Transport Association, 1989, National plan to enhance aviation safety through human factors improvements
Billings, C. E., 1991, Human-centered aircraft automation: A concept and guidelines
Billings, C. E., 1994, Human performance in automated systems: Current research and trends, 264
Bowers, C. A., 1996, Automation and human performance: Theory and applications, 243
Casey, S., 1993, Set phasers on stun
Corwin, W. H., 1993, Flight crew information requirements
Donald, M., 1991, Origins of the modem mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition
Duley, J. A., Westerman, S., Molloy, R. & Parasuraman, R. (in press). Effects of display superimposition on monitoring of automated tasks. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Columbus: Ohio State University.
Endsley, M., 1996, Automation and human performance: Theory and applications, 163
Erzberger, H., 1992, CTAS: Computer intelligence for air traffic control in the terminal area
Farber, E. & Paley, M. (1993, April). Using freeway traffic data to estimate the effectiveness of rear-end collision countermeasures. Paper presented at the Third Annual IVHS America Meeting, Washington, DC.
Federal Aviation Administration, 1990, The national plan for aviation human factors
Fitts, P. M., 1951, Human engineering for an effective air navigation and traffic control system
Funk, K., 1995, Perceived human factors problems of flightdeck automation
Gerwin, D., 1986, Human factors: Man, machines and new technology, 157
Hancock, P. A., 1996, Automation and human performance: Theory and applications, 461
Hancock, P. A., 1989, Intelligent interfaces
Hancock, P. A., 1996, Automation and human performance: Theory and applications, 337
Harris, W., Hancock, P. A. & Arthur, E. (1993). The effect of task load projection on automation use, performance, and workload. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Aviation psychology (pp. 890A–890F). Columbus: Ohio State University.
Hilburn, B., Jorna, P. G. A. M. & Parasuraman, R. (1995). The effect of advanced ATC automation on mental workload and monitoring performance: An empirical investigation in Dutch airspace. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 1382–1387). Columbus: Ohio State University.
Hopkin, V. D., 1995, Human factors in air-traffic control
IVHS America, 1992, Strategic plan for IVHS in the United States
Kuchar, J. K. & Hansman, R. J. (1995). A probabilistic methodology for the evaluation of alerting system performance. In Proceedings of the IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA Symposium. Cambridge, MA.
Langer, E., 1989, Mindfulness
Lewandowsky, S. & Nikolic, D. (1995, April). A connectionist approach to modeling the effects of automation. Paper presented at the 8th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Columbus, OH.
Main Commission Aircraft Accident Investigation—WARSAW, 1994, Report on the accident to Airbus A320-211 aircraft in Warsaw on 14 September 1993
May, P., Molloy, R. & Parasuraman, R. (1993, October). Effects of automation reliability and failure rate on monitoring performance in a multitask environment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, Seattle, WA.
McClellan, J. M. (1994, June). Can you trust your autopilot? Flying, 76–83.
McClumpha, A., 1994, Human performance in automated systems: Recent research and trends, 314
Ministere de l'Equipement, des Transports et du Tourisme, 1993, Rapport de la Commission d'Enquete sur l'Accident survenu le 20 Janvier 1992 pres du Mont Saite Odile a l/Airbus A. 320 Immatricule F-GGED Exploite par lay Compagnie Air Inter
Molloy, R., Deaton, J. E. & Parasuraman, R. (1995). Monitoring performance with the EMACS display in an automated environment. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 68–73). Columbus, OH.
Molloy, R., 1994, Human performance in automated systems: Current research and trends, 224
Mosier, K., Heers, S., Skitka, L. & Burdick, M. (1996, March). Patterns in the use of cockpit automation. Paper presented at the 2nd Automation Technology and Human Performance Conference, Cocoa Beach, FL.
Mosier, K., 1996, Automation and human performance: Theory and applications, 201
Mosier, K., Skitka, L., Burdick, M. & Heers, S. (1996). Automation bias, accountability, and verification behaviors. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting (pp. 204–208). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Mosier, K., 1994, Human performance in automated systems: Current research and trends, 191
Mouloua, M., 1994, Human performance in automated systems: Recent research and trends
Muir, B. M., 1988, Cognitive engineering in complex dynamic worlds, 71
National Transportation Safety Board, 1973, Eastern Airlines L-1011, Miami, Florida, 20 December 1972
National Transportation Safety Board, 1986, China Airlines B-747-SP, 300 NM northwest of San Francisco, 19 February 1985
National Transportation Safety Board, 1994, Aircraft accident report: Stall and loss of control on final approach
National Transportation Safety Board, 1997, Collision of Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority Train T111 with standing train at Shady Grove Station, near Gaithersburg, MD, January 6, 1996
National Transportation Safety Board, 1997, Grounding of the Panamanian passenger ship Royal Majesty on Rose and Crown shoal near Nantucket, Massachusetts, June 10, 1995
Palmer, E. & Degani, A. (1991). Electronic checklists: Evaluation of two levels of automation. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 178–183). Columbus: Ohio State University.
Parasuraman, R., 1993, Human factors and advanced aviation technologies, 147
Parasuraman, R., 1992, Theory and design of adaptive automation in aviation systems
Parasurarnan, R., 1996, Automation and human performance: Theory and applications
Parasuraman, R., 1994, Human performance in automated systems: Current research and trends, 45
Parasuraman, R., 1996, Automation and human performance: Theory and applications, 91
Phillips, D., 1995, Washington Post, A7
Planzer, N., 1995, Advancing free flight through human factors
Poset, R. K., 1992, Air Line Pilot, 61, 28
Radio and Technical Committee on Aeronautics, 1995, Free flight implementation
Rasmussen, J., 1986, Information processing and humanmachine interaction
Riley, V. (1989). A general model of mixed-initiative human-machine systems. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting (pp. 124–128). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Riley, V. (1994a). Human use of automation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
Riley, V., 1994, Human performance in automated systems: Recent research and trends, 8
Riley, V., 1996, Automation and human performance: Theory and applications, 19
Riley, V., 1993, Analytic methods for flight-deck automation design and evaluation. phase two report: Pilot use of automation
Sarter, N., 1996, Automation and human performance: Theory and applications, 267
Sarter, N., 1995, “Strong, silent, and out-of the-loop”: Properties of advanced (cockpit) automation and their impact on human-automation interaction
Satchell, P., 1993, Cockpit monitoring and alerting systems
Scerbo, M. S., 1996, Automation and human performance: Theory and applications, 37
Schank, R., 1984, The cognitive computer.
Sheridan, T., 1980, Technology Review, 10, 61
Sheridan, T., 1992, Telerobotics, automation, and supervisory control
Singh, I. L., Deaton, J. E. & Parasuraman, R. (1993, October). Development of a scale to measure pilot attitudes to cockpit automation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, Seattle, WA.
Spitzer, C. R., 1987, Digital avionics systems
Thompson, J. M., 1994, Human performance in automated systems: Current research and trends, 68
Wickens, C. D., 1992, Engineering psychology and human performance, 2
Wickens, C. D. (1994). Designing for situation awareness and trust in automation. In Proceedings of the IFAC Conference on Integrated Systems Engineering (pp. 174–179). Baden-Baden, Germany: International Federation on Automatic Control.
Wiener, E. L., 1989, Human factors of advanced technology (“glass cockpit”) transport aircraft
Woods, D. D., 1996, Automation and human performance: Theory and applications, 3
Woods, D. D., Wise, J. & Hanes, L. (1981). An evaluation of nuclear power plant safety parameter display systems. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 25th Annual Meeting (pp. 110–114). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Zuboff, S., 1988, In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power