Human population studies with cytogenetic biomarkers: Review of the literature and future prospectives

Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis - Tập 45 Số 2-3 - Trang 258-270 - 2005
Stefano Bonassi1, Donatella Ugolini2,1, Micheline Kirsch‐Volders3, Ulf Strömberg4, Roel Vermeulen5, James D. Tucker6
1Unit of Environmental Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Cancer Research Institute, Genoa, Italy
2Dipartimento di Oncologia, Biologia e Genetica, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
3Laboratorium voor Cellulaire Genetica, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
4Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
5Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
6Department of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan

Tóm tắt

Abstract

Cytogenetic biomarkers are by far the most frequently used endpoints in human population studies. Their sensitivity for measuring exposure to genotoxic agents and their role as early predictors of cancer risk have contributed to this success. In this article, we present an overview of the last 25 years of population studies with cytogenetic biomarkers, describing the evolution of this research and addressing the most promising innovations for the future. The evaluation has been restricted to the most popular assays, i.e., chromosomal aberrations (CAs) and micronucleus (MN), which are considered to be causally related to early stages of chronic diseases, especially cancer, and may therefore play a major role in prevention. An extensive literature search covering the period 1 January 1980 to 31 December 2003 was performed using the Medline/PubMed database. A total of 833 population studies using CAs and 434 using matched MN inclusion criteria were included in the analysis. We report the distribution of selected papers by year of publication, country, language, agents investigated, and methods employed. The state of the art and future prospects regarding cytogenetic techniques and epidemiologic and statistical methods are discussed. The role of susceptibility and its potential impact on genotoxic damage are discussed with special attention to the effect of major genetic polymorphisms on the baseline frequency of CAs and micronuclei. Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1093/carcin/22.3.415

10.1093/carcin/bgg104

Aka P, 2005, Influence of hOOG1, XRCC1 and XRCC3 genotypes on DNA strand break repair phenotype and biomarkers of genotoxicity in workers exposed to γ‐rays, Radiat Res

10.1016/S1383-5742(00)00049-1

10.1289/ehp.6343

Ashby J, 1985, Tabulation and assessment of 113 human surveillance cytogenetic studies conducted between 1965 and 1984, Mutat Res, 154, 113, 10.1016/0165-1110(85)90023-5

10.1289/ehp.6632

Beck JC, 2001, Successful transformation of cryopreserved lymphocytes: a resource for epidemiological studies, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 10, 551

Bolognesi C, 1997, Age‐related increase of chromosome aberrations, sister‐chromatid exchanges and micronuclei in human lymphocytes, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 6, 249

10.1016/0165-1161(94)90034-5

10.1016/0165-4608(94)00131-T

10.1016/S1383-5718(98)00153-3

Bonassi S, 2000, Chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes predict human cancer independently of exposure to carcinogens, Cancer Res, 60, 1619

10.1159/000077519

10.1038/ng1090

10.1093/carcin/23.3.381

10.1078/1438-4639-00251

10.1017/CBO9780511814365

10.1016/S0140-6736(99)05482-3

10.1016/S0304-3835(01)00400-1

Cheung VG, 2002, The genetics of variation in gene expression, Nat Genet, 32, 522, 10.1038/ng1036

10.1159/000077521

Clayton D, 1993, Statistical models in epidemiology

10.1667/0033-7587(2001)155[0643:ARICCR]2.0.CO;2

10.1126/science.296.5572.1391

10.1098/rspb.1969.0073

10.1016/S1383-5718(99)00051-0

10.1016/0165-1161(85)90015-9

10.1016/S1383-5742(99)00053-8

10.1016/S1383-5718(02)00249-8

10.1136/bmj.292.6522.746

10.1002/em.20069

Hagmar L, 1994, Cancer risk in humans predicted by increased levels of chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes: Nordic study group on the health risk of chromosome damage, Cancer Res, 54, 2919

Hagmar L, 1998, Chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes predict human cancer: a report from the European Study Group on Cytogenetic Biomarkers and Health (ESCH), Cancer Res, 58, 4117

10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3360

10.1007/BF00368011

Hayes RB, 2002, Whole blood cryopreservation in epidemiological studies, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 11, 1496

10.1159/000076283

Hosmer DW, 1989, Applied logistic regression

10.1016/0165-1161(95)90035-7

10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2003.10.007

10.1667/0033-7587(2002)158[0424:TSGBAC]2.0.CO;2

10.1016/S1383-5718(02)00003-7

10.1128/CDLI.6.1.14-19.1999

Knudsen LE, 1999, Chromosomal aberrations in humans induced by urban air pollution: influence of DNA repair and polymorphisms of glutathione S‐transferase M1 and N‐acetyltransferase 2, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 8, 303

10.1038/85776

10.1016/S1383-5718(03)00034-2

10.1002/em.10138

10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04502.x

Liou SH, 1999, Increased chromosome‐type chromosome aberration frequencies as biomarkers of cancer risk in a blackfoot endemic area, Cancer Res, 59, 1481

10.1667/0033-7587(2001)155[0660:CCEIBG]2.0.CO;2

10.1159/000077490

10.1016/S1383-5718(03)00171-2

10.1038/ng1335

10.1007/BF00344234

10.1078/1438-4639-00069

10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.12.042

10.1016/S0165-1218(97)00049-9

10.1016/S1383-5718(96)00149-0

Piegorsch WW, 1997, Statistics for environmental biology and toxicology

10.1289/ehp.02110399

10.1097/00008571-200006000-00005

10.1016/0921-8734(95)00015-X

Rothman N, 1995, Incorporating biomarkers into cancer epidemiology: a matrix of biomarker and study design categories, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 4, 301

Rothman KJ, 1998, Modern epidemiology

10.1097/00008571-199912000-00008

10.1002/1098-2280(2001)37:1<17::AID-EM1002>3.0.CO;2-F

10.1016/S1383-5718(96)00152-0

10.1093/jnci/82.22.1746

10.1126/science.273.5274.494

10.1159/000077520

10.1289/ehp.0110941

10.1002/1097-0320(20010901)45:1<19::AID-CYTO1140>3.0.CO;2-G

10.1038/ng0496-368

10.1289/ehp.98106s1231

10.1016/S1383-5718(98)00135-1

10.1097/01.pas.0000124338.49401.ef

10.1016/S0140-6736(65)91835-0

Tucker JD, 1997, Cytogenetic end‐points as biological dosimeters and predictors of risk in epidemiological studies

Tucker JD, 2002, Sensitivity, specificity, and persistence of chromosome translocations for radiation biodosimetry, Mil Med, 167, 8, 10.1093/milmed/167.suppl_1.8

10.1080/10408449891344254

10.1002/cyto.990170203

10.1093/mutage/12.5.397

10.1093/jnci/djh075

10.1016/j.ygeno.2003.12.016

10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3308