How to understand what you don't believe: Metacognitive training prevents belief-biases in multiple text comprehension
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abendroth, 2020, Text-belief consistency effects in adolescents' comprehension of multiple documents from the Web [El efecto de consistencia en la comprehension lectora de los adolescentes de documentas multiples provenientes de Internet], Journal for the Study of Education and Development/Infancia Y Aprendizaje, 43, 60, 10.1080/02103702.2019.1692289
Abendroth, 2020
Albrecht, 1993, Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 106l
Amstad, 1978
Anderson, 1978, Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 1, 10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90485-1
Anmarkrud, 2013, Task-oriented reading of multiple documents: Online comprehension processes and offline products, Instructional Science, 41, 873, 10.1007/s11251-013-9263-8
Baker, 1984, Metacognitive skills and reading, 353
Barzilai, 2018, Promoting integration of multiple texts: A review of instructional approaches and practices, Educational Psychology Review, 30, 973, 10.1007/s10648-018-9436-8
Beker, 2016, Learning from texts: Activation of information from previous texts during reading, Reading and Writing, 29, 1161, 10.1007/s11145-016-9630-3
Bless, 1994, Need for cognition: Eine skala zur erfassung von Engagement und freude bei denkaufgaben [need for cognition: A scale for assessing commitment and joy regarding cognitive tasks], Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 25, 147
Bohn-Gettler, 2018, Effects of task relevance instructions and topic beliefs on reading processes and memory, Discourse Processes, 55, 410, 10.1080/0163853X.2017.1292824
Braasch, 2017, The discrepancy-induced source comprehension (D-ISC) model: Basic assumptions and preliminary evidence, Educational Psychologist, 52, 167, 10.1080/00461520.2017.1323219
Bråten, I., Braasch, J. L., & Salmerón, L. (in press). Reading multiple and non-traditional texts: New opportunities and new challenges. In E. B. Moje, P. Afflerbach, P. Enciso, & N. K. Lesaux (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. Vol. V). New York, NY: Routledge.
Britt, 1999, Content integration and source separation in learning from multiple texts, 209
Britt, 2014, Scientific Literacy: The role of goal-directed reading and evaluation in understanding scientific information, Educational Psychologist, 49, 104, 10.1080/00461520.2014.916217
van den Broek, 2015, Inference generation in text comprehension: Automatic and strategic processes in the construction of a mental representation, 94
Cacioppo, 1982, The need for cognition, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116, 10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
Chinn, 1993, The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction, Review of Educational Research, 63, 1, 10.3102/00346543063001001
Clinton, 2019, Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta‐analysis, Journal of Research in Reading, 42, 288, 10.1111/1467-9817.12269
Cohen, 1988
Dai, 2007, The role of need for cognition and reader beliefs in text comprehension and interest development, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 332, 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.05.002
Eagly, 1993
Faul, 2007, G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences, Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175, 10.3758/BF03193146
Flavell, 1976, Metacognitive aspects of problem solving, 231
Gilead, 2019, That's my truth: Evidence for involuntary opinion confirmation, Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, 393, 10.1177/1948550618762300
van Gog, 2010, Example-based learning: Integrating cognitive and social-cognitive research perspectives, Educational Psychology Review, 22, 155, 10.1007/s10648-010-9134-7
Hattie, 2007, The power of feedback, Review of Educational Research, 77, 81, 10.3102/003465430298487
Holm, 1979, A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics,, 6, 65
Inquisit 4 [Computer software]
Isberner, 2014, Comprehension and validation: Separable stages of information processing? A case for epistemic monitoring in language comprehension, 245
Johnson, 1994, Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1420
Kaakinen, 2011, Online processing of and memory for perspective relevant and irrelevant text information, 223
Kardash, 1996, Effects of preexisting beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues, Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 260, 10.1037/0022-0663.88.2.260
Keil, 2010, The feasibility of folk science, Cognitive Science, 34, 826, 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01108.x
Kintsch, 1988, The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model, Psychological Review, 95, 163, 10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
Ku, 2010, Metacognitive strategies that enhance critical thinking, Metacognition and Learning, 5, 251, 10.1007/s11409-010-9060-6
Limon, 2002
Maier, 2013, Text-belief consistency effects in the comprehension of multiple texts with conflicting information, Cognition and Instruction, 31, 151, 10.1080/07370008.2013.769997
Maier, 2014, Fostering multiple text comprehension: How metacognitive strategies and motivation moderate the text-belief consistency effect, Metacognition & Learning, 9, 54, 10.1007/s11409-013-9111-x
Maier, 2016, Effects of text-belief consistency and reading task on the strategic validation of multiple texts, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31, 479, 10.1007/s10212-015-0270-9
Maier, 2018, Cognitive processes underlying the text-belief consistency effect: An eye-movement study, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32, 171, 10.1002/acp.3391
McCrudden, 2016, Differences in student reasoning about belief-relevant arguments: A mixed methods study, Metacognition and Learning, 11, 275, 10.1007/s11409-015-9148-0
McCrudden, 2011, Relevance in text comprehension, 1
McNamara, 2009, Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension, 297, 10.1016/S0079-7421(09)51009-2
Münchow, H., Richter, T., & Schmid, S. (in press). What does it take to deal with academic literature? Epistemic components of scientific literacy. In O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, H. A. Pant, M. Toepper & C. Lautenbach (Eds.). Student learning in German higher education: Innovative modelling and measurement approaches and research results. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer.
Nickerson, 1998, Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises, Review of General Psychology, 2, 175, 10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
O'Brien, 2015, Models of discourse comprehension, 217
Perfetti, 1999, Toward a theory of documents representation, 99
Richter, 2011, Cognitive flexibility and epistemic validation in learning from multiple texts, 125
Richter, 2015, Validation and comprehension of text information: Two sides of the same coin, Discourse Processes, 52, 337, 10.1080/0163853X.2015.1025665
Richter, 2017, Comprehension of multiple documents with conflicting information: A two-step model of validation, Educational Psychologist, 52, 148, 10.1080/00461520.2017.1322968
Richter, T., Münchow, H., & Abendroth, J. (in press). The role of validation in integrating multiple perspectives. In P. Van Meter, A. List, D. Lombardi, & P. Kendeou (Eds.). Handbook of learning from multiple representations and perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
Richter, 2010, Epistemological beliefs and epistemic strategies in self-regulated learning, Metacognition and Learning, 5, 47, 10.1007/s11409-009-9038-4
Richter, 2009, You don't have to believe everything you read: Background knowledge permits fast and efficient validation of information, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 538, 10.1037/a0014038
Richter, 2017, Discourse updating: Acquiring and revising knowledge through discourse, 167
Ross, 1975, Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: Biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 880, 10.1037/0022-3514.32.5.880
Rouet, 2011, Relevance processes in multiple document comprehension, 19
Rouet, 2017, Resolv: Readers' representation of reading contexts and tasks, Educational Psychologist, 52, 200, 10.1080/00461520.2017.1329015
Rouet, 1996, Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history, Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 478, 10.1037/0022-0663.88.3.478
Scharrer, 2014, You'd better ask an expert: Mitigating the comprehensibility effect on laypeople's decisions about science-based knowledge claims, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 465, 10.1002/acp.3018
Schmalhofer, 1986, Three components of understanding a programmer's manual: Verbatim, propositional, and situational representations, Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 279, 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90002-1
Singer, 2013, Validation in reading comprehension, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 361, 10.1177/0963721413495236
Slavin, 2014
Stadtler, 2018, Learning from multiple documents: How can we foster multiple document literacy skills in a sustainable way?, 46
Swart, 2019, Supporting learning from text: A meta-analysis on the timing and content of effective feedback, Educational Research Review, 28, 10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100296
Thomas, 1972
Voss, 1993, On the processing of arguments, Argumentation, 7, 165, 10.1007/BF00710663
Wiley, 2005, A fair and balanced look at the news: What affects memory for controversial arguments?, Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 95, 10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.001
Wiley, 2018, Effects of instructional conditions on comprehension from multiple sources in history and science, 341
Wolfe, 2009, Argumentation schema and the myside bias in written argumentation, Written Communication, 26, 183, 10.1177/0741088309333019
Wyer, 1999, The comprehension and validation of social information, Psychological Review, 106, 89, 10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.89