How to structure online discussions for meaningful discourse: a case study

British Journal of Educational Technology - Tập 36 Số 1 - Trang 5-18 - 2005
Patricia K. Gilbert1, Nada Dabbagh2
1Customization Department, Pearson Prentice Hall, Needham, MA, USA.
2Graduate School of Education, George Mason University.

Tóm tắt

Abstract

This study examined the impact of structuredness of asynchronous online discussion protocols and evaluation rubrics on meaningful discourse. Transcripts of twelve online discussions involving 87 participants from four sections of a graduate course entitled Instructional Technology Foundations and Learning Theory were analysed across four semesters. Protocols and evaluation rubrics guiding online discussions in this course ranged from minimal structure or loosely defined protocols in the first section, to high sructure or well defined and comprehensive protocols and evaluation criteria in the fourth section. The analyses revealed that some elements of structure had a significant impact on meaningful discourse. Particularly, guidelines that assisted the facilitation and evaluation of online discussions increased the cognitive quality of student postings promoting a deeper and more meaningful understanding of course content.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bloom B. S., 1956, Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain

Bodzin A. M., 2000, Dialogue patterns of preservice science teachers using asynchronous computer‐mediated communications on the world wide web, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 19, 161

10.1007/BF02763377

Collins A., 1991, Educational values and cognitive instruction: implications for reform, 121

Dabbagh N., Online learning: concepts, strategies, and application

Duffy T. M., 1996, Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. A project of the association for educational communications and technology, 170

Funaro G. M., 1999, Pedagogical roles and implementation guidelines for online communication tools, Asynchornous Learning Network Magazine, 3, 1

10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG

10.1023/A:1003764722829

10.1007/978-3-642-77684-7_8

10.2190/PMG8-A05J-CUH1-DK14

10.1080/08923649509526885

10.1007/978-3-642-77684-7_1

10.2307/358974

National Education Association, 2000, A survey of traditional and distance learning higher education members

Swan K., 2000, Course design factors influencing the success of online learning, Proceedings of the WebNet 2000 World Conference on the WWW and Internet, USA, 513

Tiene D., 2000, Online discussions: a survey of advantages and disadvantages compared to face‐to‐face discussions, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9, 371

10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00164-1

10.1080/08923649909527033

Winegardner K. E.(2001).The case study method of scholarly research. Retrieved July 2001 from:http://www.tgsa.edu/online/cybrary/case1.html.

Yin R., 1994, Case study research: design and methods