How to expand the safe limits in hepatic resections?

Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences - Tập 21 Số 6 - Trang 399-404 - 2014
José Manuel Asencio1, José Luis García Sabrido1, Luis Olmedilla2
1General Surgery III Department and Liver Transplant Unit Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón c/ Doctor Esquerdo 46 Madrid 28007 Spain
2Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Tóm tắt

Abstract The size of the remnant liver after an extended hepatectomy is currently the main limiting factor for performing curative hepatic surgery in patients with tumors and liver metastasis. The current guidelines for extended hepatectomies require that the future remnant liver volume needs to be higher than 20% of the original liver in healthy organs, of 30% in livers with steatosis or exposed to chemotherapy, and of 40% in patients with cirrhosis in order to prevent the “small‐for‐size” syndrome, characterized by the development of liver dysfunction with ascites, coagulopathy and cholestasis. Observations from the use of small liver grafts in liver transplantation and an increased surgical experience has improved our understanding of the mechanisms responsible for the development of liver dysfunction after extended hepatectomies. Increasing the size of the future liver remnant, the introduction of the “small‐for‐flow” concept with the perioperative monitoring and modulation of portal blood flow and pressure, and the exploration of the potential effects of regeneration preconditioning, are all promising strategies that could expand the indications and increase the safety of liver surgery.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1023/A:1008347829017

10.1093/bmb/ldq003

10.1016/j.ejca.2007.07.017

10.1016/j.suronc.2009.10.002

10.1097/01.sla.0000145965.86383.89

10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.09.007

10.1177/000313480507100313

10.1159/000335713

10.1016/0002-9610(75)90323-2

Pack GT, 1962, Regeneration of human liver after major hepatectomy, Surgery, 52, 617

10.1097/01.ccx.0000157080.11117.45

10.1007/s11605-012-2048-6

10.1016/j.surg.2010.10.001

10.1097/01.sla.0000189131.90876.9e

10.1111/j.1478-3231.2008.01777.x

10.1002/ssu.2980090404

10.1097/00000478-200608000-00009

10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.12.006

10.1002/lt.21797

10.1002/lt.21989

10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a64b38

10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.05.037

10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.11.011

10.1016/j.mehy.2013.01.028

10.1007/s00534-007-1297-3

10.1097/01.TP.0000046532.44975.57

Yan JQ, 2005, Split liver transplantation: a reliable approach to expand donor pool, Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 4, 339

10.1097/00007890-199901270-00024

10.1002/lt.21863

10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ffb2d7

10.1016/j.mehy.2009.08.018

10.1002/lt.22059

Makuuchi M, 1990, Preoperative portal embolization to increase safety of major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct carcinoma: a preliminary report, Surgery, 107, 521

10.1097/01.SLA.0000065265.16728.C0

10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815f6e5b

10.1002/bjs.7630

10.1002/hep.1840210226

10.1097/00000658-200012000-00006

Gayowski TJ, 1994, Experience in hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of clinical and pathologic risk factors, Surgery, 116, 703

10.1007/s00384-008-0620-z

10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824856f5

10.1002/bjs.8955

10.1007/s11605-012-2132-y

10.1111/j.1432-2277.2006.00373.x

10.1002/lt.23457

10.1016/S0168-8278(02)00088-0

10.1016/j.bpj.2009.01.061