How sticky are local expenditures in Italy? Assessing the relevance of the flypaper effect through municipal data

Angrist, J. D., & Lavy, V. (1998). Does teacher training affect pupil learning? Evidence from matched comparisons in Jerusalem public schools, NBER working paper, N. 6781.

Bailey, S. J., & Connolly, S. (1998). The flypaper effect: identifying areas for further research. Public Choice, 95, 335–361.

Becker, E. (1996). The illusion of fiscal illusion: unsticking the flypaper effect. Public Choice, 86, 85–102.

Besley, T., & Case, A. (1995). Does electoral accountability affect economic policy choices? Evidence from gubernatorial term limits. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 769–798.

Borge, L. E., Falch, T., & Tovmo, P. (2008). Public sector efficiency: the roles of political and budgetary institutions, fiscal capacity, and democratic participation. Public Choice, 136, 475–495.

Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2009). Microeconometrics using stata. College Station: Stata press.

Campbell, D., & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company.

Case, A. C., Hines, J. R., & Rosen, H. S. (1993). Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence: evidence from the states. Journal of Public Economics, 52(3), 285–307.

Courant, P. N., Gramlich, E. M., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (1979). The stimulative effect of intergovernmental grants: or why money sticks where it hits. In P. Mieszkowski & W. Oakland (Eds.), Fiscal federalism and grants-in-aid (pp. 5–21). Washington: Urban Institute.

Dahlberg, M., Mörk, E., Rattsø, J., & Agren, H. (2008). Using a discontinuous grant rule to identify the effect of grants on local taxes and spending. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 2320–2335.

Dalle Nogare, C., & Galizzi, M. (2011). The political economy of cultural spending: evidence from Italian cities. Journal of Cultural Economics, 35(3), 203–231.

Darby, J., Muscatelli, A., & Roy, G. (2004). Fiscal federalism, fiscal consolidations and cuts in central government grants: evidence from an event study. Cesifo working paper N. 1305.

Dharmapala, D., & Khanna, V. (2012). Corporate governance, enforcement and firm value: evidence from India. Journal of Law, Economics and Organizations. doi: 10.1093/jleo/ews011 . First published online April 7, 2012.

Franco, D., Messina, G., & Zotteri, S. (2004). Fiscal decentralisation in Italy: an unfinished agenda. Wirtschaftspolitische Blatter, 4, 467–481.

Gamkhar, S., & Oates, W. E. (1996). Asymmetries in the response to increases and decreases intergovernmental grants: some empirical findings. National Tax Journal, 49(4), 501–512.

Gamkhar, S., & Shaw, A. (2007). The impact of intergovernmental fiscal transfers: a synthesis of the conceptual and empirical literature. In R. Boadway & A. Shaw (Eds.), Intergovernmental fiscal transfers. Principles and practice (pp. 225–258). World Bank.

Gemmell, N., Morrissey, O., & Pinar, A. (2002). Fiscal illusion and political accountability: theory and evidence from two local tax regimes in Britain. Public Choice, 110, 199–224.

Gramlich, E. M. (1977). Intergovernmental grants: a review of the empirical literature. In W. E. Oates (Ed.), The political economy of fiscal federalism, Lexington, MA (pp. 219–239).

Gramlich, E. M. (1987). Federalism and federal deficit reduction. National Tax Journal, 40(3), 299–313.

Gramlich, E. M., & Galper, H. (1973). State and local fiscal behaviour and federal grant policy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1973(1), 15–65.

Guryan, J. (2001). Does money matter? Regression-discontinuity estimates from education finance reform in Massachusetts. NBER working paper, N. 8269.

Hamilton, B. W. (1983). The flypaper effect and other anomalies. Journal of Public Economics, 22, 347–361.

Heyndels, B. (2001). Asymmetries in the flypaper effect: empirical evidence for the flemish municipalities. Applied Economics, 33, 1329–1334.

Hines, J. R., & Thaler, R. (1995). Anomalies. The flypaper effect. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 217–226.

Inman, R. P. (2008). The flypaper effect. NBER working paper, N. 14579.

Johansson, E. (2003). Intergovernmental grants as a tactical instrument: empirical evidence from Swedish municipalities. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 883–915.

Knight, B. (2002). Endogenous federal grants and crowd-out of state government spending: theory and evidence from the federal highway aid program. The American Economic Review, 92(1), 71–92.

Legrenzi, G. (2009). Asymmetric and non-linear adjustments in local fiscal policy. CESifo working paper N. 2550.

Levaggi, R., & Zanola, R. (2003). Flypaper effect and sluggishness: evidence from regional health expenditure in Italy. International Tax and Public Finance, 10, 535–547.

McGuire, M. (1975). An economic model of federal grants and local fiscal response. In W. E. Oates (Ed.), Financing the new federalism, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Niskanen, W. A. (1968). Bureaucrats and politicians. The Journal of Law and Economics, 18, 617–643.

Oates, W. E. (1977). The political economy of fiscal federalism. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

Oates, W. E. (1979). Lump-sum grants have price effects. In P. Mieszkowski & W. H. Oakland (Eds.), Fiscal federalism and grants-in-aid, Washington: The Urban Institute.

Oates, W. E. (1981). On local finance and the Tiebout effect. American Economic Review, 71, 93–98.

Tovmo, P., & Falch, T. (2002). The flypaper effect and political strength. Economics of Governance, 3, 153–170.

Wickoff, P. G. (1991). The elusive flypaper effect. Journal of Urban Economics, 30, 310–328.

Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.