How is phonological processing related to individual differences in children’s arithmetic skills?

Developmental Science - Tập 13 Số 3 - Trang 508-520 - 2010
Bert De Smedt1,2, Jessica Taylor2, Lisa M. D. Archibald3, Daniel Ansari2
1Centre for Parenting, Child Welfare & Disabilities, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
2Numerical Cognition Laboratory, University of Western Ontario, Canada
3Language, Reading and Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, University of Western Ontario, Canada

Tóm tắt

Abstract

While there is evidence for an association between the development of reading and arithmetic, the precise locus of this relationship remains to be determined. Findings from cognitive neuroscience research that point to shared neural correlates for phonological processing and arithmetic as well as recent behavioral evidence led to the present hypothesis that there exists a highly specific association between phonological awareness and single‐digit arithmetic with relatively small problem sizes. The present study examined this association in 37 typically developing fourth and fifth grade children. Regression analyses revealed that phonological awareness was specifically and uniquely related to arithmetic problems with a small but not large problem size. Further analysis indicated that problems with a high probability of being solved by retrieval, but not those typically associated with procedural problem‐solving strategies, are correlated with phonological awareness. The specific association between phonological awareness and arithmetic problems with a small problem size and those for which a retrieval strategy is most common was maintained even after controlling for general reading ability and phonological short‐term memory. The present findings indicate that the quality of children’s long‐term phonological representations mediates individual differences in single‐digit arithmetic, suggesting that more distinct long‐term phonological representations are related to more efficient arithmetic fact retrieval.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/j.jecp.2007.12.001

10.1006/jecp.1996.0042

10.1038/301419a0

10.1080/87565640801982312

10.1006/jecp.1996.2358

10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.299

10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6

10.1080/02643290244000239

10.1006/jecp.1998.2451

10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.09.005

10.1080/09541440244000328

10.1044/jslhr.4105.1136

10.1073/pnas.0608961104

10.1016/j.jecp.2005.01.003

Fowler A.E., 1991, Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman, 97

10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.493

10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.29

10.3758/BF03210559

10.1111/j.2044-8295.1991.tb02407.x

10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.041

10.1006/jecp.2000.2586

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4931-05.2006

10.1006/jecp.2002.2674

10.1006/jecp.2002.2670

10.1016/j.jecp.2006.09.001

10.1007/s00426-007-0112-8

10.1111/1467-8624.00571

10.1006/jecp.1994.1027

10.1037/0278-7393.22.1.216

10.1080/095414496383211

10.1093/cercor/bhm006

10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.011

Noël M.P., 2004, Working memory as a predictor of addition skills and addition strategies in children, Current Psychology of Cognition, 22, 3

10.1080/87565640801982320

10.1016/S0021-9924(01)00060-0

10.1016/j.jecp.2005.01.004

10.1093/cercor/bhi055

10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.439

10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135645

Shalev R., 2007, Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities, 49

10.1073/pnas.95.5.2636

10.1093/oso/9780195077872.001.0001

10.1002/dys.341

10.1080/09541440701614922

Snowling M.J., 2000, Dyslexia

10.3758/BF03195856

10.1097/00001756-200102120-00024

Torgesen J.K., 1999, Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE)

10.1038/nn1065

10.1097/WNR.0b013e328307f5c1

Wagner R.K., 1999, Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing

10.1037/0012-1649.33.3.468

Woodcock R.W., 2001, Woodcock‐Johnson III Tests of Achievement