How follower traits and cultural values influence the effects of leadership

*Abdel-Halim, 1981, Personality and task moderators of subordinate responses to perceived leader behavior, Human Relations, 34, 73, 10.1177/001872678103400105 *Abdel-Halim, 1983, Effects of task and personality characteristics on subordinate responses to participative decision making, Academy of Management Journal, 26, 477, 10.2307/256258 Aguinis, 1995, Statistical power with moderated multiple regression in management research, Journal of Management, 21, 1141 Aguinis, 2010, Best-practice recommendations for estimating interaction effects using moderated multiple regression, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 776, 10.1002/job.686 Anderson, 2015, Unfulfilled promise: Laboratory experiments in public management research, Public Management Review, 17, 1518, 10.1080/14719037.2014.943272 Antonakis, 2017, On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications, The Leadership Quarterly, 28, 5, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.01.006 Antonakis, J., & Day, D. V. (2018). Leadership: Past, present, and future. Sage Publications Antonakis, 2010, On making causal claims: A review and recommendations, The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 1086, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010 Ayman, 2018, Contingencies, context, situation, and leadership Bass, 1985 Bass, 1990 Bastardoz, 2019, The nature of followership: Evolutionary analysis and review, The Leadership Quarterly, 30, 81, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.09.004 *Belschak, 2015, Leading Machiavellians: How to translate Machiavellians’ selfishness into pro-organizational behavior, Journal of Management, 41, 1934, 10.1177/0149206313484513 Bennett, 2016, Better together? Examining profiles of employee recovery experiences, Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 1635, 10.1037/apl0000157 Bosco, 2015, Correlational effect size benchmarks, Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 431, 10.1037/a0038047 Bradley, 2020, The personality underpinnings of strategic leadership: The CEO, TMT, and Board of Directors *Brouer, 2007, Dispositional and situational moderators of the relationship between leader–member exchange and work tension, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1418, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00219.x Carsten, 2010, Exploring social constructions of followership: A qualitative study, The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 543, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.015 *Chen, 2007, Delegation and employee work outcomes: An examination of the cultural context of mediating processes in China, Academy of Management Journal, 50, 226 *Chen, 2015, Social exchange spillover in leader–member relations: A multilevel model, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 673, 10.1002/job.2030 *Chen, 2016, When does supervisor support encourage innovative behavior? Opposite moderating effects of general self-efficacy and internal locus of control, Personnel Psychology, 69, 123, 10.1111/peps.12104 *Chi, 2014, Understanding when leader negative emotional expression enhances follower performance: The moderating roles of follower personality traits and perceived leader power, Human Relations, 67, 1051, 10.1177/0018726714526626 *Chiu, 2016, Initiating and utilizing shared leadership in teams: The role of leader humility, team proactive personality, and team performance capability, Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 1705, 10.1037/apl0000159 Cheong, 2018, A review of the effectiveness of empowering leadership, The Leadership Quarterly, 30, 34, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.08.005 *Colbert, 2009, The role of goal-focused leadership in enabling the expression of conscientiousness, Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 790, 10.1037/a0014187 Cohen, 1977 Cohen, 1988 Cohen, 2003 Colquitt, 2008, From the editors publishing laboratory research in AMJ: A question of when, not if, Academy of Management Journal, 51, 616 *Cummins, 1989, Locus of control and social support: Clarifiers of the relationship between job stress and job satisfaction, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 772, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb01258.x Crant, 2000, Proactive behavior in organizations, Journal of Management, 26, 435, 10.1177/014920630002600304 De *Hoogh, 2009, Neuroticism and locus of control as moderators of the relationships of charismatic and autocratic leadership with burnout, Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1058, 10.1037/a0016253 *Elias, 2009, Restrictive versus promotive control and employee work outcomes: The moderating role of locus of control, Journal of Management, 35, 369 *Erdogan, 2006, Collectivism as a moderator of responses to organizational justice: Implications for leader-member exchange and ingratiation, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 1, 10.1002/job.365 *Evans, 1974, Extensions of a path-goal theory of motivation, Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 172, 10.1037/h0036516 Eva, 2019, Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research: The leadership quarterly yearly review for 2019, The Leadership Quarterly, 30, 111, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004 *Felfe, 2006, Personality and the perception of transformational leadership: The impact of extraversion, neuroticism, personal need for structure, and occupational self-efficacy 1, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 708, 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00026.x *Frieder, 2018, Linking job-relevant personality traits, transformational leadership, and job performance via perceived meaningfulness at work: A moderated mediation model, Journal of Applied Psychology, 103, 324, 10.1037/apl0000274 Gabriel, 2015, Emotional labor actors: A latent profile analysis of emotional labor strategies, Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 863, 10.1037/a0037408 Gardner, 2017, Understanding “it depends” in organizational research: A theory-based taxonomy, review, and future research agenda concerning interactive and quadratic relationships, Organizational Research Methods, 20, 610, 10.1177/1094428117708856 *Gilmore, 2013, Positive affectivity neutralizes transformational leadership’s influence on creative performance and organizational citizenship behaviors, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 1061, 10.1002/job.1833 *Greenbaum, 2012, Bottom-line mentality as an antecedent of social undermining and the moderating roles of core self-evaluations and conscientiousness, Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 343, 10.1037/a0025217 *Greenbaum, 2017, Employee Machiavellianism to unethical behavior: The role of abusive supervision as a trait activator, Journal of Management, 43, 585, 10.1177/0149206314535434 *Guay, 2015, To whom does transformational leadership matter more? An examination of neurotic and introverted followers and their organizational citizenship behavior, The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 851, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.06.005 Harrison, 2017, Publication bias in strategic management research, Journal of Management, 43, 400, 10.1177/0149206314535438 Hofstede, 1980 Hon, 2016, When will the trickle-down effect of abusive supervision be alleviated? The moderating roles of power distance and traditional cultures, Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 57, 421, 10.1177/1938965515624013 Howell, 1986, Moderator variables in leadership research, Academy of Management Review, 11, 88, 10.2307/258333 *Hu, 2018, Leader humility and team creativity: The role of team information sharing, psychological safety, and power distance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 103, 313, 10.1037/apl0000277 Hui, 2004, Employment relationships in China: Do workers relate to the organization or to people?, Organization Science, 15, 232, 10.1287/orsc.1030.0050 Inceoglu, 2018, Leadership behavior and employee well-being: An integrated review and a future research agenda, Leadership Quarterly, 29, 179, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.006 *Jung, 2009, Moderating role of subordinates’ attitudes on transformational leadership and effectiveness: A multi-cultural and multi-level perspective, The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 586, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.011 Judge, 2002, Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765, 10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.765 Judge, 2005, Core self-evaluations and job and life satisfaction: The role of self-concordance and goal attainment, Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 257, 10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.257 Judge, 2009, The bright and dark sides of leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm, The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 855, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.09.004 Kelemen, 2019, Leading day-to-day: A review of the daily causes and consequences of leadership behaviors, The Leadership Quarterly, 31, 101344, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101344 *Kirkman, 2009, Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination, Academy of Management Journal, 52, 744, 10.5465/amj.2009.43669971 Klotz, 2018, Examining the nature, causes, and consequences of profiles of organizational citizenship behavior, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39, 629, 10.1002/job.2259 Kruglanski, 1989 *Lee, 2000, Power-distance, gender and organizational justice, Journal of Management, 26, 685 *Lee, 2014, Cultures have consequences: A configural approach to leadership across two cultures, The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 692, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.03.003 LeBreton, 2008, Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement, Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815, 10.1177/1094428106296642 Lemoine, 2019, Taking stock of moral approaches to leadership: An integrative review of ethical, authentic, and servant leadership, Academy of Management Annals, 13, 148, 10.5465/annals.2016.0121 *Li, 2015, Traditional Chinese leadership and employee voice behavior: A cross-level examination, The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 172, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.08.001 *Li, 2011, The role of organizational insiders’ developmental feedback and proactive personality on newcomers’ performance: An interactionist perspective, Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1317, 10.1037/a0024029 *Li, 2013, Spotlight on the followers: An examination of moderators of relationships between transformational leadership and subordinates’ citizenship and taking charge, Personnel Psychology, 66, 225, 10.1111/peps.12014 *Li, 2016, Can self-sacrificial leadership promote subordinate taking charge? The mediating role of organizational identification and the moderating role of risk aversion, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, 758, 10.1002/job.2068 *Lian, 2012, Does power distance exacerbate or mitigate the effects of abusive supervision? It depends on the outcome, Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 107, 10.1037/a0024610 *Lin, 2018, How is benevolent leadership linked to employee creativity? The mediating role of leader–member exchange and the moderating role of power distance orientation, Journal of Business Ethics, 152, 1099, 10.1007/s10551-016-3314-4 *Lin, 2019, Why and when employees like to speak up more under humble leaders? The roles of personal sense of power and power distance, Journal of Business Ethics, 158, 937, 10.1007/s10551-017-3704-2 *Liu, 2010, Abusive supervision and subordinate supervisor-directed deviance: The moderating role of traditional values and the mediating role of revenge cognitions, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 835, 10.1348/096317909X485216 Liden, 2009, Considering context in psychological leadership research, Human Relations, 62, 1587, 10.1177/0018726709346374 Lonati, 2018, On doing relevant and rigorous experiments: Review and recommendations, Journal of Operations Management, 64, 19, 10.1016/j.jom.2018.10.003 *Mackey, 2013, Subordinate social adaptability and the consequences of abusive supervision perceptions in two samples, The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 732, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.07.003 *Mawritz, 2014, Hostile climate, abusive supervision, and employee coping: Does conscientiousness matter?, Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 737, 10.1037/a0035863 *McAllister, 2018, The role of self-regulation in the relationship between abusive supervision and job tension, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39, 416, 10.1002/job.2240 *McCormick, 2019, Proactive personality and proactive behaviour: Perspectives on person–situation interactions, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92, 30, 10.1111/joop.12234 McClelland, 1993, Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects, Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376, 10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376 *Meier, 2015, Episodes of incivility between subordinates and supervisors: Examining the role of self-control and time with an interaction-record diary study, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 1096, 10.1002/job.2013 Merz, 2011, A latent profile analysis of the Five Factor Model of personality: Modeling trait interactions, Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 915, 10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.022 *Mitchell, 2012, Employees’ behavioral reactions to supervisor aggression: An examination of individual and situational factors, Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 1148, 10.1037/a0029452 Mueller, 2018, Finding new kinds of needles in haystacks: Experimentation in the course of abduction, Academy of Management Discoveries, 4, 103, 10.5465/amd.2018.0081 Murphy, 2014 *Nahum-Shani, 2011, Leadership, OCB and individual differences: Idiocentrism and allocentrism as moderators of the relationship between transformational and transactional leadership and OCB, The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 353, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.02.010 *Nahum-Shani, 2014, Supervisor support: Does supervisor support buffer or exacerbate the adverse effects of supervisor undermining?, Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 484, 10.1037/a0035313 *Nandkeolyar, 2014, Surviving an abusive supervisor: The joint roles of conscientiousness and coping strategies, Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 138, 10.1037/a0034262 *Newman, 2014, The influence of follower cultural orientation on attitudinal responses towards transformational leadership: Evidence from the Chinese hospitality industry, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25, 1024, 10.1080/09585192.2013.815250 *Newman, 2017, How servant leadership influences organizational citizenship behavior: The roles of LMX, empowerment, and proactive personality, Journal of Business Ethics, 145, 49, 10.1007/s10551-015-2827-6 O’Boyle, 2017, The chrysalis effect: How ugly initial results metamorphosize into beautiful articles, Journal of Management, 43, 376, 10.1177/0149206314527133 O’Boyle, 2019, A 20-year review of outcome reporting bias in moderated multiple regression, Journal of Business and Psychology, 34, 19, 10.1007/s10869-018-9539-8 Owens, 2012, Modeling how to grow: An inductive examination of humble leader behaviors, contingencies, and outcomes, Academy of Management Journal, 55, 787, 10.5465/amj.2010.0441 Owens, 2015, Leader narcissism and follower outcomes: The counterbalancing effect of leader humility, Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1203, 10.1037/a0038698 *Ozer, 2008, Personal and task-related moderators of leader-member exchange among software developers, Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1174, 10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1174 *Panaccio, 2015, Toward an understanding of when and why servant leadership accounts for employee extra-role behaviors, Journal of Business and Psychology, 30, 657, 10.1007/s10869-014-9388-z Parker, 2010, Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors, Journal of Management, 36, 633, 10.1177/0149206308321554 *Peltokorpi, 2020, Abusive supervision and subordinates’ physical and mental health: The effects of job satisfaction and power distance orientation, International Journal of Human Resource Management. *Perry, 2010, The downside of goal-focused leadership: The role of personality in subordinate exhaustion, Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1145, 10.1037/a0020538 Perera, 2018, Profiles of teacher personality and relations with teacher self-efficacy, work engagement, and job satisfaction, Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 171, 10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.034 Podsakoff, 2019, Experimental designs in management and leadership research: Strengths, limitations, and recommendations for improving publishability, The Leadership Quarterly, 30, 11, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.11.002 Podsakoff, 1995, Searching for a needle in a haystack: Trying to identify the illusive moderators of leadership behaviors, Journal of Management, 21, 422, 10.1177/014920639502100303 *Richard, 2020, Supervisor abuse effects on subordinate turnover intentions and subsequent interpersonal aggression: The role of power-distance orientation and perceived human resource support climate, Journal of Business Ethics, 164, 549, 10.1007/s10551-018-4019-7 *Runyon, 1973, Some interactions between personality variables and management styles, Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 288, 10.1037/h0034723 Rego, 2017, How leader humility helps teams to be humbler, psychologically stronger, and more effective: A moderated mediation model, Leadership Quarterly, 28, 639, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.02.002 Riggio, 2008 *Schaubroeck, 2007, Embracing transformational leadership: Team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1020, 10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1020 Scholl, 2001, Effects of promotive and restrictive control on economic performance, 75 Schriesheim, 1997, Substitutes-for-leadership theory: Development and basic concepts, The Leadership Quarterly, 8, 103, 10.1016/S1048-9843(97)90009-6 Schwartz, 1992, Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1, 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6 *Selvarajan, 2016, Role of personality and affect on the social support and work family conflict relationship, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 94, 39, 10.1016/j.jvb.2016.02.004 *Sheikh, 2013, Transformational leadership and job involvement in the Middle East: The moderating role of individually held cultural values, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 1077, 10.1080/09585192.2012.703216 *Sui, 2016, Understanding the curvilinear relationships between LMX differentiation and team coordination and performance, Personnel Psychology, 69, 559, 10.1111/peps.12115 Tangney, 2004, High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success, Journal of Personality, 72, 271, 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x *Tepper, 2001, Personality moderators of the relationship between abusive supervision and subordinates’ resistance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 974, 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.974 *Thau, 2007, An extension of uncertainty management theory to the self: The relationship between justice, social comparison orientation, and antisocial work behaviors, Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 250, 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.250 *Tosi, 1970, A reexamination of personality as a determinant of the effects of participation, Personnel Psychology, 23, 91, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1970.tb01638.x *Tse, 2018, When and why does transformational leadership influence employee creativity? The roles of personal control and creative personality, Human Resource Management, 57, 145, 10.1002/hrm.21855 Uhl-Bien, 2014, Followership theory: A review and research agenda, The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 83, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.007 *Velez, 2018, Shaping emotional reactions to ethical behaviors: Proactive personality as a substitute for ethical leadership, Leadership Quarterly, 29, 663, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.06.004 *Vogel, 2015, A cross-cultural examination of subordinates’ perceptions of and reactions to abusive supervision, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 720, 10.1002/job.1984 *Van Kleef, 2009, Searing sentiment or cold calculation? The effects of leader emotional displays on team performance depend on follower epistemic motivation, Academy of Management Journal, 52, 562, 10.5465/amj.2009.41331253 *Van Kleef, 2010, On angry leaders and agreeable followers: How leaders’ emotions and followers’ personalities shape motivation and team performance, Psychological Science, 21, 1827, 10.1177/0956797610387438 Van Kleef, 2009, How emotions regulate social life: The emotions as social information (EASI) model, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 184, 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01633.x Van Knippenberg, 2013, A critical assessment of charismatic—Transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board?, The Academy of Management Annals, 7, 1, 10.5465/19416520.2013.759433 Villa, 2003, Problems with detecting moderators in leadership research using moderated multiple regression, Leadership Quarterly, 14, 3, 10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00184-4 *Wang, 2017, Ethical leadership and loyalty to supervisor in China: The roles of interactional justice and collectivistic orientation, Journal of Business Ethics, 146, 529, 10.1007/s10551-015-2916-6 Wang, 2019, Meta-analytic and primary investigations of the role of followers in ratings of leadership behavior in organizations, Journal of Applied Psychology, 104, 70, 10.1037/apl0000345 *Wexley, 1973, Subordinate personality as a moderator of the effects of participation in three types of appraisal interviews, Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 54, 10.1037/h0035411 Whetten, 1989, What constitutes a theoretical contribution, Academy of Management Review, 14, 490, 10.2307/258554 *Wu, 2013, Abusive supervision and subordinate emotional labor: The moderating role of openness personality, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 956, 10.1111/jasp.12060 *Wu, 2019, The impact of mentoring quality on protégés’ organization-based self-esteem and proactive behavior: The moderating role of traditionality, Human Resource Management, 58, 417, 10.1002/hrm.21968 Xie, 2016, The relationship between personality types and prosocial behavior and aggression in Chinese adolescents, Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 56, 10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.002 *Xu, 2019, Abusive supervision and subordinate proactive behavior: Joint moderating roles of organizational identification and positive affectivity, Journal of Business Ethics, 157, 829, 10.1007/s10551-017-3691-3 *Yang, 2010, Middle manager leadership and frontline employee performance: Bypass, cascading, and moderating effects, Journal of Management Studies, 47, 654, 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00902.x *Yuan, 2020, Resource depletion perspective on the link between abusive supervision and safety behaviors, Journal of Business Ethics, 162, 213, 10.1007/s10551-018-3983-2 *Zhang, 2014, High core self-evaluators maintain creativity: A motivational model of abusive supervision, Journal of Management, 40, 1151, 10.1177/0149206312460681