How credible are the study results? Evaluating and applying internal validity tools to literature-based assessments of environmental health hazards

Environment International - Tập 92 - Trang 617-629 - 2016
Andrew A. Rooney1, Glinda S. Cooper2, Gloria D. Jahnke3, Juleen Lam4, Rebecca L. Morgan5, Abee L. Boyles1, Jennifer M. Ratcliffe6, Andrew D. Kraft2, Holger J. Schünemann5, Pamela Schwingl6, Teneille D. Walker2, Kristina A. Thayer1, Ruth M. Lunn3
1Office of Health Assessment and Translation, Division of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
2National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA
3Office of the Report on Carcinogens, Division of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
4University of California, San Francisco, Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment, San Francisco, CA, USA
5McMaster University, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
6Integrated Laboratory Systems (ILS), Morrisville, NC, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Agerstrand, 2011, Reporting and evaluation criteria as means towards a transparent use of ecotoxicity data for environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals, Environ. Pollut., 159, 2487, 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.06.023

AHRQ (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality)

Atkins, 2004, Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group, BMC Health Serv. Res., 4, 38, 10.1186/1472-6963-4-38

Bal-Price, 2011, Guidance on Good Cell Culture Practice (GCCP), vol. 56, 1

Balshem, 2011, GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence, J. Clin. Epidemiol., 64, 401, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015

Barnes, 1997, Scientific quality of original research articles on environmental tobacco smoke, Tob. Control., 6, 19, 10.1136/tc.6.1.19

Barnes, 1998, Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions, J. Am. Med. Assoc., 279, 1566, 10.1001/jama.279.19.1566

Bero, 2013, Why the Cochrane risk of bias tool should include funding source as a standard item, Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 12, 10.1002/14651858.ED000075

Bero, 2007, Factors associated with findings of published trials of drug–drug comparisons: why some statins appear more efficacious than others, PLoS Med., 4, 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040184

Beronius, 2014, Facilitating the use of non-standard in vivo studies in health risk assessment of chemicals: a proposal to improve evaluation criteria and reporting, J. Appl. Toxicol., 34, 607, 10.1002/jat.2991

Birnbaum, 2013, Implementing systematic review at the National Toxicology Program, Environ. Health Perspect., 121, A108, 10.1289/ehp.1306711

Blair, 2007, Methodological issues regarding confounding and exposure misclassification in epidemiological studies of occupational exposures, Am. J. Ind. Med., 50, 199, 10.1002/ajim.20281

Christensen, 2014, The use of epidemiology in risk assessment: challenges and opportunities, Hum. Ecol. Risk. Assess. Int. J., 21, 1644, 10.1080/10807039.2014.967039

Cooper, 2016, Study sensitivity: Evaluating the ability to detect effects in systematic reviews of chemical exposures, Environ. Int., 92-93, 605, 10.1016/j.envint.2016.03.017

Craig, 2012, Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new Medical Research Council guidance, J. Epidemiol. Community Health, 66, 1182, 10.1136/jech-2011-200375

Dunn, 2014, Financial conflicts of interest and conclusions about neuraminidase inhibitors for influenza: an analysis of systematic reviews, Ann. Intern. Med., 161, 513, 10.7326/M14-0933

ECVAM (European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods)

EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2010, Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making, EFSA J., 1

Ghio, 2012, Controlled human exposures to diesel exhaust, Swiss Med. Wkly., 142, w13597

Guyatt, 2011, GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence–inconsistency, J. Clin. Epidemiol., 64, 1294, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.017

Guyatt, 2011, GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence–publication bias, J. Clin. Epidemiol., 64, 1277, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011

Guyatt, 2011, GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence-study limitations (risk of bias), J. Clin. Epidemiol., 64, 407, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.017

Higgins

Hill, 1965, The environment and disease: association or causation?, Proc. R. Soc. Med., 58, 295

Hirst, 2014, The need for randomization in animal trials: an overview of systematic reviews, PLoS One, 9, 10.1371/journal.pone.0098856

IARC (International Agency for Reserach on Cancer), 1990, No. 100, 352

IOM (Institute of Medicine), 2009, 414

IOM (Institute of Medicine), 2011, 318

Krauth, 2014, Nonindustry-sponsored preclinical studies on statins yield greater efficacy estimates than industry-sponsored studies: a meta-analysis, PLoS Biol., 12, 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001770

Krauth, 2013, Instruments for assessing risk of bias and other methodological criteria of published animal studies: a systematic review, Environ. Health Perspect., 121, 985, 10.1289/ehp.1206389

Lexchin, 2003, Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review, Br. Med. J., 326, 1167, 10.1136/bmj.326.7400.1167

Liberati, 2009, The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration, PLoS Med., 6, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100

Lundh, 2012, Industry sponsorship and research outcome, Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 12, 10.1002/14651858.MR000033.pub2

McPartland, 2014, A valuable contribution toward adopting systematic review in environmental health, Environ. Health Perspect., 122, A10, 10.1289/ehp.1307701

Mollenhauer, 2011, Effects of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) exposure on markers of inflammation in female B6C3F1 mice, J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A: Tox. Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng., 46, 97, 10.1080/10934529.2011.532418

Morgan, 2016, GRADE: Assessing the quality of evidence in environmental and occupational health, Environ. Int., 92-93, 611, 10.1016/j.envint.2016.01.004

NRC (National Research Council), 2014, 1

NTP (National Toxicology Program)

NTP (National Toxicology Program), 2013

NTP (National Toxicology Program), 2015

NTP (National Toxicology Program), 2015

NTP (National Toxicology Program), 2015

Perlis, 2005, Industry sponsorship and financial conflict of interest in the reporting of clinical trials in psychiatry, Am. J. Psychiatry, 162, 1957, 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.10.1957

Popelut, 2010, Relationship between sponsorship and failure rate of dental implants: a systematic approach, PLoS One, 5, 10.1371/journal.pone.0010274

Rich, 2015, Differences in birth weight associated with the 2008 Beijing Olympic air pollution reduction: results from a natural experiment, Environ. Health Perspect., 10.1289/ehp.1408795

Rooney, 2014, Systematic review and evidence integration for literature-based environmental health science assessments, Environ. Health Perspect., 122, 711, 10.1289/ehp.1307972

Rothman, 2005, Causation and causal inference in epidemiology, Am. J. Public Health, 95, S144, 10.2105/AJPH.2004.059204

Schneider, 2009, "ToxRTool", a new tool to assess the reliability of toxicological data, Toxicol. Lett., 189, 138, 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.05.013

Schünemann, 2012, Chapter 11: presenting results and ‘summary of findings’ tables

Sterne, 2013, Why the Cochrane risk of bias tool should not include funding source as a standard item, Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 12, 10.1002/14651858.ED000076

Sterne, 2014

Thayer, 2014, Intersection of systematic review methodology with the NIH reproducibility initiative, Environ. Health Perspect., 122, A176, 10.1289/ehp.1408671

Viswanathan, 2012

WHO (International Programme on Chemical Safety, World Health Organization), 1999, 312

Woodruff, 2014, The Navigation Guide Systematic Review Methodology: a rigorous and transparent method for translating environmental health science into better health outcomes, Environ. Health Perspect., 122, 1007, 10.1289/ehp.1307175

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Environment International

Tập 92

617-629

Thông tin tác giả