How arbitrary is language?

Padraic Monaghan1, Richard Shillcock2,3, Morten H. Christiansen4,5, Simon Kirby3
1Centre for Research in Human Development and Learning, Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YF, UK
2School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AD, UK School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AD, UK.
3School of Philosophy, Psychology, and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AD, UK
4Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
5Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT 06511, USA

Tóm tắt

It is a long established convention that the relationship between sounds and meanings of words is essentially arbitrary—typically the sound of a word gives no hint of its meaning. However, there are numerous reported instances of systematic sound–meaning mappings in language, and this systematicity has been claimed to be important for early language development. In a large-scale corpus analysis of English, we show that sound–meaning mappings are more systematic than would be expected by chance. Furthermore, this systematicity is more pronounced for words involved in the early stages of language acquisition and reduces in later vocabulary development. We propose that the vocabulary is structured to enable systematicity in early language learning to promote language acquisition, while also incorporating arbitrariness for later language in order to facilitate communicative expressivity and efficiency.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

de Saussure F, 1916, Course in general linguistics

10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88

10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227

Eco U, 1995, The search for the perfect language

Plato, 1961, Cratylus. In The collected dialogues, 421

10.1353/lan.2004.0056

Ramachandran VS, 2001, Synaesthesia: a window into perception, thought and language, J. Conscious. Stud., 8, 3

10.1037/a0014171

Gasser M, 2010, Empirical and experimental methods in cognitive/functional research, 163

Wilkins J, 1668, An essay towards a real character and a philosophical language

Gasser M, 2004, Proc. 26th Annual Conf. of the Cognitive Science Society, 434

10.1117/12.969060

10.1037/a0022924

Hinton L, 1994, Sound symbolism

Kantartzis K, 2009, Proc. 31st Annual Conf. of the Cognitive Science Society, 591

10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.015

10.1098/rstb.2013.0298

10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.016

10.1515/langcog-2012-0007

10.1016/j.cognition.2009.04.001

10.1037/a0027747

10.1016/j.jecp.2012.05.004

10.1177/0956797609354734

10.1177/0956797611421791

Ohala J, 1994, Sound symbolism, 325

10.1016/S0361-9230(97)00094-4

10.1075/ml.3.2.05tam

10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.06.002

Otis K, 2008, Proc. 30th annual meeting of the cognitive science society, 65

Schütze J, 1997, Ambiguity resolution in language learning

10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211

Hutchins SS. 1997 The psychological reality variability and compositionality of English phonesthemes. Dissertation Abstracts International 59 4500B. University Microfilms no. AAT 9901857.

Shillcock RC, 2001, Proc. 2001 Conf. of Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech, 53

Baayen RH, 1995, The CELEX Lexical database

Zipf G, 1949, Human behavior and the principle of least effort

10.1075/ml.5.3.02mon

10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.662

10.1121/1.1907526

10.1016/j.jml.2004.12.003

10.3758/PBR.15.5.971

Burnard L, 1995, British national corpus: users reference guide British national corpus, v. 1.0

10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.09.001

10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01515-1

Cuskley C, 2013, Oxford handbook of synaesthesia, 869

Klein E, 1966, A comprehensive etymological dictionary of the English language: dealing with the origin of words and their sense development thus illustrating the history of civilization and culture

OED Online. 2013 Oxford UK: Oxford University Press (accessed 5 July). See http://www.oed.com/.

10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4

10.1037/0096-1523.25.4.1142

Mantel N, 1967, The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach, Cancer Res., 27, 209

10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00495.x

10.1515/COG.2008.001

10.1177/0956797612459763

10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(199910)41:1<64::AID-NEU9>3.0.CO;2-N

10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.002

10.3758/s13414-010-0073-7

10.1207/s15516709cog2901_3

10.1017/S0140525X0999094X

10.1080/03640210701703691

10.1073/pnas.0602173103

10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01065.x

10.1111/j.1551-6709.2008.01007.x

10.1017/CBO9781139163910

10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.02.002

10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.004