How anthropogenic noise affects foraging

Global Change Biology - Tập 21 Số 9 - Trang 3278-3289 - 2015
Jinhong Luo1,2, Björn M. Siemers2, Klemen Koselj2
1Jilin Key Laboratory of Animal Resource Conservation and Utilization Northeast Normal University 130024 Changchun China
2Sensory Ecology Group Max Planck Institute for Ornithology Eberhard‐Gwinner‐Straße 82319 Seewiesen Germany

Tóm tắt

AbstractThe influence of human activity on the biosphere is increasing. While direct damage (e.g. habitat destruction) is relatively well understood, many activities affect wildlife in less apparent ways. Here, we investigate how anthropogenic noise impairs foraging, which has direct consequences for animal survival and reproductive success. Noise can disturb foraging via several mechanisms that may operate simultaneously, and thus, their effects could not be disentangled hitherto. We developed a diagnostic framework that can be applied to identify the potential mechanisms of disturbance in any species capable of detecting the noise. We tested this framework using Daubenton's bats, which find prey by echolocation. We found that traffic noise reduced foraging efficiency in most bats. Unexpectedly, this effect was present even if the playback noise did not overlap in frequency with the prey echoes. Neither overlapping noise nor nonoverlapping noise influenced the search effort required for a successful prey capture. Hence, noise did not mask prey echoes or reduce the attention of bats. Instead, noise acted as an aversive stimulus that caused avoidance response, thereby reducing foraging efficiency. We conclude that conservation policies may seriously underestimate numbers of species affected and the multilevel effects on animal fitness, if the mechanisms of disturbance are not considered.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Anderson JR, 2009, Cognitive Psychology and its Implications

10.1038/414742a

10.1371/journal.pone.0065794

10.1007/s00359-003-0463-6

10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.002

10.1007/s002650050521

10.1016/B978-0-08-045337-8.00289-8

10.1007/978-3-642-41494-7

10.1016/j.gecco.2014.11.002

10.1016/j.applanim.2011.01.007

10.1016/S0889-1591(03)00110-7

10.2307/3802487

Dietz C, 2009, Bats of Britain, Europe & Northwest Africa

10.1159/000076781

10.1093/beheco/12.2.192

10.1038/nature04416

10.1890/120183

10.1098/rspb.2012.0230

10.5751/ES-00404-060111

Fristrup KW, 2015, Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science

10.1126/science.128.3316.145

10.1073/pnas.1211533110

10.1111/j.1469-7998.1988.tb04888.x

10.1007/s00265-010-1050-9

10.1007/BF00295202

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01664.x

10.1016/S0001-4575(99)00018-4

10.1038/352153a0

10.1098/rsif.2013.0961

10.1242/jeb.092890

10.1139/z89-168

10.1016/S0018-506X(02)00024-7

Moore BC, 2012, An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing

10.1017/S1367943003003342

10.1111/gcb.12098

10.1371/journal.pone.0017478

10.1111/j.2006.0908-8857.03781.x

10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.008

10.1098/rspb.1994.0112

10.1242/jeb.022863

10.1098/rspb.2010.2262

10.1038/nature02547

10.1111/gcb.12685

10.1038/424267a

10.1016/j.tree.2010.04.005

10.1016/0169-5347(94)90134-1

Sokal R, 1994, Biometry: the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 2nd edition

10.1121/1.4733537

10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.05.001

10.1007/s00265-003-0751-8

10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.07.014

WHO, 2011, Burden of Disease from Environmental Noise: Quantification of Healthy Life Years Lost in Europe

10.46867/IJCP.2007.20.02.02

10.3389/fphys.2013.00065