How Well Are We Respecting Patient Privacy in Medical Imaging? Lessons Learnt from a Departmental Audit

Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal - Tập 67 - Trang 339-344 - 2016
Marc Dilauro1, Rebecca Thornhill1, Najla Fasih1
1The Ottawa Hospital Civic Campus Medical Imaging Department, Division of Radiology, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Tóm tắt

Rationale and Objectives Preservation of patient privacy and dignity are basic requirements for all patients visiting a hospital. The purpose of this study was to perform an audit of patients' satisfaction with privacy whilst in the Department of Medical Imaging (MI) at the Civic Campus of the Ottawa Hospital. Materials and Methods Outpatients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), ultrasonography (US), and plain film (XR) examinations were provided with a survey on patient privacy. The survey asked participants to rank (on a 6-point scale ranging from 6 = excellent to 1 = no privacy) whether their privacy was respected in 5 key locations within the Department of MI. The survey was conducted over a consecutive 5-day period. Results A total of 502 surveys were completed. The survey response rate for each imaging modality was: 55% MRI, 42% CT, 45% US, and 47% XR. For each imaging modality, the total percentage of privacy scores greater than or equal to 5 were: 98% MRI, 96% CT, 94% US, and 92% XR. Privacy ratings for the MRI reception and waiting room areas were significantly higher in comparison to the other imaging modalities ( P = .0025 and P = .0227, respectively). Conclusion Overall, patient privacy was well respected within the Department of MI.

Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.t01-1-00576.x 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.05.002 10.1177/0969733009355377 10.1136/emj.2010.093807 10.12968/denu.2012.39.10.710 10.1016/j.acra.2012.02.020 10.1080/02841850902755260 De LaceyG. ManhireA. Clinical Audit in Radiology: 100+ Recipes 2008 Royal College of Radiologists London, England 10.1186/1472-6939-14-8 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.10.029 Greene J., 2002, Hosp Health Netw, 76, 32