Homeostatic drive counteracting selection for positive and negative phototaxis and geotaxis inDrosophila pseudoobscura

Behavior Genetics - Tập 6 - Trang 327-341 - 1976
Howard Levene1, Theodosius Dobzhansky2
1Biological Sciences and Mathematical Statistics, Columbia University, New York
2Genetics, University of California at Davis, Davis

Tóm tắt

Tested in Hirsch-Hadler mazes,Drosophila pseudoobscura is on the average geoneutral and photoneutral. Strongly geo- and photopositive and geo- and photonegative populations can be obtained by artificial selection, but upon relaxation of the selection they tend to relapse toward neutrality. This genetic homeostasis is due to natural selection favoring neutrality. Experiments are described in which artificial selection for positivity and for negativity was deliberately made so weak that it only counterbalanced the natural selection or “homeostatic drive” and the effects of cross-migration. Under these conditions, the behavior of the population artificially selected for positivity diverges only slightly from that of the population selected for negativity, but, at least in females, both populations move closer to neutrality.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Dobzhansky, Th., and Spassky, B. (1967a). An experiment on migration and simultaneous selection for several traits inDrosophila pseudoobscura.Genetics 55:723–734. Dobzhansky, Th., and Spassky, B. (1967b). Effects of selection and migration on geotactic and phototactic behaviour ofDrosophila. I.Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 168:27–47. Dobzhansky, Th., and Spassky, B. (1969). Artificial and natural selection for two behavioral traits inDrosophila pseudoobscura.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 62:72–78. Dobzhansky, Th., Spassky, B., and Sved, J. (1969). Effects of selection and migration on geotactic and phototactic behaviour ofDrosophila. II.Proc. Roy Soc. Lond. Ser. B 173:191–207. Dobzhansky, Th., Levene, H., and Spassky, B. (1972). Effects of selection and migration on geotactic and phototactic behaviour ofDrosophila. III.Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Sr. B 180:21–41. Dobzhansky, Th., Judson C. L., and Pavlovsky, O. (1974). Behavior in different environments of populations ofDrosophila pseudoobscura selected for phototaxis and geotaxis.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 71:1974–1976. Hadler, N. M. (1964). Genetic influence on phototaxis inDrosophila melanogaster.Biol. Bull. 126:264–273. Hirsch, J. (1962). Individual differences in behavior and their genetic basis. In Bliss, E. L. (ed.),Roots of Behavior, Harper, New York, pp. 3–23. Hirsch, J., and Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L. (1962). Studies in experimental behavior genetics. IV. Chromosome analyses for geotaxis.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 55:732–739. Hooke, R., and Jeeves, T. A. (1961). “Direct search” solution of numerical and statistical problems.J. Assoc. Computing Mach. 8:212–229. Kaupe, A. F., Jr. (1961). Algorithm 178: Direct search.Commun. Assoc. Computing Mach. 6:313. Also remarks by Bell, M., and Pike, M. C. (1966) ibid. Algorithm 178: Direct search.Commun. Assoc. Computing Mach. 9:684, De Vogelaere, R. (1968) ibid. Algorithm 178: Direct search.Commun. Assoc. Computing Mach. 11:498, Tomlin, F. K., and Smith, L. B. (1969) ibid. Algorithm 178: Direct search.Commun. Assoc. Computing Mach. 12:637–638, Smith, L. B. (1969) ibid. Algorithm 178: Direct search.Commun. Assoc. Computing Mach. 12:638. Lerner, I. M. (1954).Genetic Homeostasis, Wiley, New York.