Home-ownership as a social norm and positional good: Subjective wellbeing evidence from panel data

Urban Studies - Tập 55 Số 6 - Trang 1290-1312 - 2018
Chris Foye1, David Clapham1, Tommaso Gabrieli2
1University of Reading, UK
2University College, London, UK.

Tóm tắt

Much attention has been devoted to examining the absolute benefits of home-ownership (e.g. security and autonomy). This paper, by contrast, is concerned with conceptualising and testing the relative benefits of home-ownership; those benefits that depend on an individual’s status in society. Home-ownership has previously been analysed as a social norm, implying that the relative benefits (costs) associated with being an owner (renter) are positively related to relevant others’ home-ownership values. The theoretical contribution of this paper is to additionally conceptualise home-ownership as a positional good, implying that the status of both home-owners and renters is negatively related to relevant others’ home-ownership consumption. The empirical contribution of this paper is to quantitatively test for these relative benefits in terms of subjective wellbeing. We run fixed effects regressions on three waves of the British Household Panel Study. We find that (1) a strengthening of relevant others’ home-ownership values is associated with increases (decreases) in the subjective wellbeing of home-owners (renters), and (2) an increase in relevant others’ home-ownership consumption decreases the life satisfaction of owners but has no effect for renters. Overall our findings suggest that (1) the relative benefits of home-ownership are both statistically significant and of a meaningful magnitude, and (2) home-ownership is likely to be both a social norm and a positional good. Without explicitly recognising these relative benefits, policymakers risk overestimating the contribution of home-ownership to societal wellbeing.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.2307/1885667

Buchholz TG, 2002, Safe at Home: The New Role of Housing in the US Economy

10.1086/345560

10.1111/ecca.12007

10.1080/01973530903316971

10.1017/CBO9781139167611

10.1007/s11205-012-0076-y

10.1016/S0094-1190(03)00080-9

Duesenberry JS, 1949, Income, saving, and the theory of consumer behavior

10.1111/1467-954X.00088

10.1016/B978-0-12-205050-3.50008-7

10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.003

10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00235.x

Frank RH, 1985, The American Economic Review, 75, 101

Frank RH (2007) Falling Behind: How Income Inequality Harms the Middle Class. Thesis, University of California Press.

10.1017/S0047279400013088

10.2307/3145880

10.1006/juec.1996.2010

10.1080/02673039982902

Haisken-DeNew JP, 2010, Journal of Applied Social Science Studies, 130, 643

Harkness J, 2003, Economic Policy Review, 9, 1

10.1111/1540-6229.t01-2-00053

Hechter M, 2001, Social Norms

Hirsch F, 2005, Social Limits to Growth

Homans GC, 1974, Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms

10.1002/9780470759646

10.1080/10511482.2014.956776

10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00145-7

10.1111/j.1540-6040.2012.01415.x

Marcuse P, 1975, Journal of Society and Social Welfare, 3, 181

Murie A, 1998, Housing and Public Policy: Citizenship, Choice and Control, 79

10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.164

10.1080/0042098002276

10.1177/0042098012462611

10.1080/14036090051084423

Saunders P, 1990, A Nation of Home Owners

10.1080/00420980500452433

10.1093/oseo/instance.00043218

10.1016/S0167-2681(98)00089-4

10.2307/1924716

Veblen T, 1899, The Theory of the Leisure Class

10.1007/s11205-007-9107-5

10.1080/17405900802405288

Wilkinson R, 2009, The Spirit Level: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger

10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.036

10.1080/02673037.2013.773583

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Urban Studies

Tập 55 Số 6

1290-1312

Thông tin tác giả