Lịch sử tư tưởng kinh tế như một công cụ phân tích: Tại sao những ý tưởng trí tuệ trong quá khứ cần được công nhận như những ngọn hải đăng cho tương lai

Backhaus, J., & Hansen, R. (2000). Methodenstreit in der Nationalökonomie. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 31(2), 307–336. Backhouse, R. E. (1994). Why and how should we study the history of economic thought? History of Economic Ideas, 2(2), 113–123. Backhouse, R. E., & Cherrier, B. (Eds.). (2017). The age of the applied economist: the transformation of economics since the 1970s. History of Political Economy, 49(Supplement), 1–33. Biddle, J. E. (2003). Research styles in the history of economic thought. In W. J. Samuels, J. E. Biddle, & J. B. Davis (Eds.), A companion to the history of economic thought (pp. 1–10). Oxford: Blackwell. Blaug, M. (2001). No history of ideas, please, We're economists. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(1), 145–164. Boettke, P.F. (2000). Why Read the Classics in Economics?. Library of economics and liberty. [online] available from http://www.econlib.org/library/Features/feature2.html, accessed 13 June 2018, internet. Bögenhold, D. (2000). Limits to mass production: Entrepreneurship and industrial Organization in View of the historical School of Schmoller and Sombart. International Review of Sociology: Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 10(1), 57–71. Bögenhold, D. (2008). Economics, sociology, history: Notes on their loss of Unity, their need for re-integration and the current relevance of the controversy between Carl Menger and Gustav Schmoller. Forum for Social Economics, 37(2), 85–101. Bögenhold, D. (2010). From heterodoxy to orthodoxy and vice versa: Economics and social sciences in the division of academic work. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 69(5), 1566–1590. Bögenhold, D. (2014). Schumpeter as a universal social theorist. The Atlantic Economic Journal, 42(2), 205–215. Bögenhold, D. (2018). Economics between insulation and social-scienciation. Journal of Economic Issues, 52(4), 1127–1144. Boulding, K. E. (1971). After Samuelson who needs Adam smith? History of Political Economy, 3(2), 225–237. Buckley, P., & Casson, M. (1993). Economics as an imperialist social science. Human Relations, 46(9), 1035–1052. Cedrini, M., & Fiori, S. (2016). Shifting boundaries, within and outside economics. History of Economic Ideas, 24(3), 11–25. Cedrini, M., & Fontana, M. (2018). Just another niche in the wall? How specialization is changing the face of economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 42(2), 427–451. Chafim, F. (2016). Disciplinary division within social sciences. Methodological issues in economic imperialism and economic pluralism. History of Economic Ideas, 24(3), 144–164. Davis, J. B. (2006). The turn in economics: Neoclassical dominance to mainstream pluralism? Journal of Institutional Economics, 2(1), 1–20. Davis, J. B. (2016). Economics imperialism versus multidisciplinarity. History of Economic Ideas, 24(3), 77–94. Davis, J. B., Weintraub, E. R., Mirowski, P., Brewer, A. A., & Backhouse, R. E. (2002). The future of the history of economics, HOPE annual supplement (Vol. 34). Raleigh: Duke University Press Books. Diebolt, C., & Haupert, M. (2018). A cliometric counterfactual: What if there had been neither Fogel nor north? Cliometrica, 12, 407–434. Dorfman, J. (1959). The economic mind in American civilization (Vol. 5). New York: Viking Press. Emmet, R. M. (2003). Exegesis, hermeneutics, and interpretation. In W. J. Samuels, J. E. Biddle, & J. B. Davis (Eds.), A companion to the history of economic thought (pp. 523–537). Oxford: Blackwell. Faccarello, G., & Kurz, H. D. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook on the history of economic analysis volume III. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Fogarty, E. A., & Naples, M. I. (1998). The presence of history: A survey of articles on the history of economic thought and methodology in the economic literature index, 1969-1995. Journal of Economic Issues, 32(1), 224–234. Fourcade, M., Etienne, O., & Yann, A. (2015). The superiority of economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(1), 89–114. Granovetter, M. S. (2002). A theoretical agenda for economic sociology. In M. F. Guillén, R. Collins, P. England, & M. Meyer (Eds.), The new economic sociology. Developments in an emerging field (pp. 35–60). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Greif, A., & Mokyr, J. (2017). Cognitive rules, institutions and economic growth: Douglass north and beyond. Journal of Institutional Economics, 13(1), 25–52. Headlee, S. (2010). Economic history. In R. C. Free (Ed.), 21st century economics: A reference handbook (pp. 13–22). London: Sage. Heilbroner, R. L. (1979). Modern economics as a chapter in the history of economic thought. History of Political Economy, 11(2), 192–198. Herbst, J. (1965). The German historical School in American Scholarship. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Hodgson, G. (2001). How economics forget history. New York: Routledge. Hodgson, G. (2007). Evolutionary and institutional economics as the new mainstream? Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 4(1), 7–25. Hodgson, G. (2017). Introduction to the Douglass C. North memorial issue. Journal of Institutional Economics, 13(1), 1–23. Hodgson, G. M., Mäki, U., & McCloskey, D. (1992). Plea for a pluralistic and rigorous economics. American Economic Review, 82(2), 25. Kates, S. (2013). Defending the history of economic thought. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Macmillan. Klaess, M. (2003). Historiography. In W. J. Samuels, J. E. Biddle, & J. B. Davis (Eds.), A companion to the history of economic thought (pp. 491–505). Oxford: Blackwell. Kurz, H. D. (2016). Economic thought. A brief history. New York: Columbia University Press. Laidler, D. (2001). The Role of the History of Economic Thought in Modern Macroeconomics. Department of Economics Research Reports, 2001–6. London. Lazear, E. P. (2000). Economic Imperialism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(1), 99–146. Louzek, M. (2011). The battle of methods in economics. The classical Methodenstreit –Menger vs. Schmoller. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 70(2), 439–463. Marchionatti, R., & Cedrini, M. (2017). Economics as social science: economics imperialism and the challenge of interdisciplinary. London: Routledge. Marcuzzo, M. C. (2008). Is history of economic thought a serious subject? The Erasmus Journal of Philosophy and Economics, 1(1), 107–123. Marcuzzo, M. C., & Zacchia, G. (2016). Is history of economics what historians of economic thought do? History of Economic Ideas, 24(3), 29–46. Menger, C. (1883). Untersuchungen über die Methode der sozialwissenschaften und der Politischen Ökonomie insbesondere. Leipzig: Duncker and Humblot. Morgan, M. (2012). The world in the model. How economists work and think. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press. Richter, R. (2001). ‘Bridging old and new institutional economics: Gustav Schmoller, the leader of the younger German historical school, seen with neoinstitutionalists’ eyes. Research Paper, University of Saarland. Romer, P. M. (2015). Mathiness in the theory of economic growth. American Economic Review, 105(5), 89–93. Roncaglia, A. (2014). Should the history of economic thought be included in undergraduate curricula? Economic Thought, 3(1), 1–9. Samuels, W. (1997). The work of historians of economic thought. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 15, 188–198. Schabas, M. (1992). Breaking away: History of economics as history of science. History of Political Economy, 24(1), 187–203. Schmoller, G. (1883). Zur Methodologie der Staats-und Sozialwissenschaften, Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirtschaft im deutschen Reich (pp. 239–258), Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot. Schumpeter, J. A. (1926). Gustav von Schmoller und die Probleme von heute. Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirtschaft im deutschen Reich (pp 337–388), Leipzig: Duncker and Humblot. Schumpeter, J. A. (1954). History of economic analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Shionoya, Y. (Ed.). (2001). The German historical school: The historical and ethical approach to economics. London: Routledge. Shionoya, Y. (2005). The soul of the German historical school: Methodological essays on Schmoller, Weber and Schumpeter. New York: Springer. Sombart, W. (1982). Wirtschaft. In A. Vierkandt (Ed.), Handwörterbuch der Soziologie (pp. 209–216). Stuttgart: Enke. Sombart, W. (1987). Der moderne Kapitalismus. Munich: DTV. Swedberg, R. (1991). The battle of methods: Toward a paradigm shift? In A. Etzioni, & P. R. Lawrence (Eds.) Socio-economics. Toward a new synthesis (pp. 13–34). New York and London: M. E. Sharpe. Swedberg, R. (2000). Max Weber and the idea of economic sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Vaughn, K. L. (1993). Why teach the history of economics? Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 15(2), 174–183. Viner, J. (1917). Some problems of logical method in political economy. Journal of Political Economy, 25(3), 236–260. Weber, M. (1972). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr. Weber, M. (1988a). Wissenschaft als Beruf. In M. Weber (Ed.), Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre (pp. 524–555). Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr. Weber, M. (1988b). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr. Weintraub, E. R. (2002). How economics became a mathematical science. Durham: Duke University Press. Winch, D. N. (1962). What Price the history of economic thought. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 9(3), 193–204. Wunder, T. A. (2010). Economic methodology. In R. C. Free (Ed.), 21st century economics: A reference handbook (pp. 23–32). London: Sage.