Hip fusion takedown to a total hip arthroplasty—is it worth it? A systematic review

International Orthopaedics - Tập 41 - Trang 1535-1542 - 2017
Julio J. Jauregui1, Joseph K. Kim2, William P. Shield1, Matthew Harb2, Emmanuel M. Illical2, Farshad Adib1, Aditya V. Maheshwari2
1Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, USA
2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, USA

Tóm tắt

Patients with surgically or spontaneously fused hips are often dissatisfied with their overall function and the debilitating effect on adjacent joints. Therefore, in properly selected patients, hip fusion-takedown and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) can result in improved function and decreased pain. We aimed to (1) evaluate the indications for conversion, (2) evaluate the clinical outcomes, (3) analyze the overall complications, and (4) identify the overall satisfaction following the procedure. A systematic and comprehensive literature search was performed to analyze studies evaluating conversion of hip fusion to THA. After reviewing 3,882 studies, 27 total studies (1,104 hips) met our inclusion/exclusion criteria and were included in our final analysis. A weighted mean of rates was determined for each complication, including infection, instability, loosening, nerve-related, abductor-related, venous thrombotic event, and revision. The study population consisted of 53.2% male and 46.8% female subjects. The mean age at time of conversion was 52 years (range 36–65 years), the mean time until follow-up was 9.2 years (range 2.5–17.3), and the mean duration of arthrodesis was 27.7 years (range 11–40.2). As measured by Harris Hip Score, overall clinical outcomes improved from 58.1 points (range 42.4–70 points) pre-operatively to 80.0 (range 62–93.5) post-operatively. The specific complication rates were 5.3% (range 0–43.6%) for infection, 2.6% (range 0–15.4%) for instability, 6.2% (range 0–17.2%) for loosening, 4.7% (range 0–13%) for nerve-related complications, 13.1% (range 0–87%) for abductor-related complications, and 1.2% (range 0–13%) for venous thrombotic events. The revision rate was 12.0% (range 0–43.6%). Takedown of a fused-hip can be a challenging procedure. Although patients can benefit functionally, both patients and surgeons need to be aware of the complications and increased risk of further revision procedures, which should be an important part of the pre-operative discussion.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Stover MD, Beaule PE, Matta JM, Mast JW (2004) Hip arthrodesis: a procedure for the new millennium? Clin Orthop Relat Res 418:126–133 Bonin SJ, Eltoukhy MA, Hodge WA, Asfour SS (2012) Conversion of fused hip to total hip arthroplasty with presurgical and postsurgical gait studies. J Arthroplasty 27(3):493 e499–493 e412. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.07.013 Peterson ED, Nemanich JP, Altenburg A, Cabanela ME (2009) Hip arthroplasty after previous arthrodesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(11):2880–2885. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-1027-z Richards CJ, Duncan CP (2011) Conversion of hip arthrodesis to total hip arthroplasty: survivorship and clinical outcome. J Arthroplasty 26(3):409–413. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2010.02.005 Swanson MA, Huo MH (2011) Total hip arthroplasty in the ankylosed hip. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19(12):737–745 Villanueva M, Sobron FB, Parra J, Rojo JM, Chana F, Vaquero J (2013) Conversion of arthrodesis to total hip arthroplasty: clinical outcome, complications, and prognostic factors of 21 consecutive cases. HSS J 9(2):138–144. doi:10.1007/s11420-013-9330-3 Aderinto J, Lulu OB, Backstein DJ, Safir O, Gross AE (2012) Functional results and complications following conversion of hip fusion to total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 94(11 Suppl A):36–41. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.94B11.30615 Brewster RC, Coventry MB, Johnson EW Jr (1975) Conversion of the arthrodesed hip to a total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 57(1):27–30 Callaghan JJ, Brand RA, Pedersen DR (1985) Hip arthrodesis. A long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67(9):1328–1335 Cameron HU, Jung YB (1987) Results of total hip arthroplasty without trochanteric osteotomy following hip fusion. Orthop Rev 16(9):646–650 Cameron HU (2005) Hip fusion takedown. Orthopedics 28(9):949–950 Fernandez-Fairen M, Murcia-Mazon A, Torres A, Querales V, Murcia A Jr (2011) Is total hip arthroplasty after hip arthrodesis as good as primary arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(7):1971–1983. doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1704-y Hamadouche M, Kerboull L, Meunier A, Courpied JP, Kerboull M (2001) Total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of ankylosed hips: a five to twenty-one-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A(7):992–998 Hardinge K, Murphy JC, Frenyo S (1986) Conversion of hip fusion to Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 211:173–179 Howard MB, Bruce WJ, Walsh W, Goldberg JA (2002) Total hip arthroplasty for arthrodesed hips. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 10(1):29–33 Joshi AB, Markovic L, Hardinge K, Murphy JC (2002) Conversion of a fused hip to total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(8):1335–1341 Kilgus DJ, Amstutz HC, Wolgin MA, Dorey FJ (1990) Joint replacement for ankylosed hips. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72(1):45–54 Kim YH, Oh SH, Kim JS, Lee SH (2003) Total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of osseous ankylosed hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 414:136–148. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000081935.75404.7f Kim YL, Shin SI, Nam KW, Yoo JJ, Kim YM, Kim HJ (2007) Total hip arthroplasty for bilaterally ankylosed hips. J Arthroplasty 22(7):1037–1041. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2007.03.027 Kreder HJ, Williams JI, Jaglal S, Axcell T, Stephen D (1999) A population study in the Province of Ontario of the complications after conversion of hip or knee arthrodesis to total joint replacement. Can J Surg 42(6):433–439 Lubahn JD, Evarts CM, Feltner JB (1980) Conversion of ankylosed hips to total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 153:146–152 Morsi E (2007) Total hip arthroplasty for fused hips; planning and techniques. J Arthroplasty 22(6):871–875. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2006.09.003 Park KS, Yoon TR, Lee TM, Ahn YS (2015) Ceramic on ceramic hip arthroplasty in fused hips. Indian J Orthop 49(3):336–341. doi:10.4103/0019-5413.156209 Rajaratnam SS, Sexton SA, Waters TS, Walter WL, Zicat BA, Walter WK (2009) Long term results of cementless total hip replacement for reversal of hip ankylosis. Hip Int 19(2):120–127 Reikeras O, Bjerkreim I, Gundersson R (1995) Total hip arthroplasty for arthrodesed hips. 5- to 13-year results. J Arthroplasty 10(4):529–531 Rittmeister ME, Manthei L, Hailer NP (2005) Prosthetic replacement in secondary Girdlestone arthroplasty has an unpredictable outcome. Int Orthop 29(3):145–148. doi:10.1007/s00264-005-0635-9 Rutz E, Schafer D, Valderrabano V (2009) Total hip arthroplasty after hip joint ankylosis. J Orthop Sci 14(6):727–731. doi:10.1007/s00776-009-1390-3 Schafer D, Dick W, Morscher E (2000) Total hip arthroplasty after arthrodesis of the hip joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120(3-4):176–178 Sirikonda SP, Beardmore SP, Hodgkinson JP (2008) Role of hip arthrodesis in current practice: long term results following conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 18(4):263–271 Strathy GM, Fitzgerald RH Jr (1988) Total hip arthroplasty in the ankylosed hip. A ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70(7):963–966 Yoon BH, Ha YC, Lee YK, Koo KH (2015) Postoperative deep infection after cemented versus cementless total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 30(10):1823–1827. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.04.041 Blom AW, Taylor AH, Pattison G, Whitehouse S, Bannister GC (2003) Infection after total hip arthroplasty. The Avon experience. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 85(7):956–959 van der Weegen W, Kornuijt A, Das D (2016) Do lifestyle restrictions and precautions prevent dislocation after total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Clin Rehabil 30(4):329–339. doi:10.1177/0269215515579421 Howie DW, Holubowycz OT, Middleton R, Large Articulation Study Group (2012) Large femoral heads decrease the incidence of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(12):1095–1102. doi:10.2106/JBJS.K.00570 Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Greidanus NV, Bohm ER, Petrak MJ, Della Valle CJ, Gross AE (2012) The Frank Stinchfield Award: Dislocation in revision THA: do large heads (36 and 40 mm) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(2):351–356. doi:10.1007/s11999-011-2146-x Brown GD, Swanson EA, Nercessian OA (2008) Neurologic injuries after total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 37(4):191–197 Januel JM, Chen G, Ruffieux C, Quan H, Douketis JD, Crowther MA, Colin C, Ghali WA, Burnand B, Group I (2012) Symptomatic in-hospital deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism following hip and knee arthroplasty among patients receiving recommended prophylaxis: a systematic review. JAMA 307(3):294–303. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.2029 Corbett KL, Losina E, Nti AA, Prokopetz JJ, Katz JN (2010) Population-based rates of revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. PLoS One 5(10):e13520. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013520 Ranawat CS, Ranawat AS, Ramteke AA, Nawabi D, Meftah M (2016) Long-term results of a first-generation annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene in young, active patients. Orthopedics:1–5. doi:10.3928/01477447-20160119-02 Jain S, Giannoudis PV (2013) Arthrodesis of the hip and conversion to total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Arthroplasty 28(9):1596–1602. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.025