Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species

Nature Communications - Tập 4 Số 1
Lars Gamfeldt1, Tord Snäll1, Robert Bagchi2, Micael Jonsson3, Lena Gustafsson1, Petter Kjellander4, María C. Ruiz-Jaén5, Mats Fröberg6, Johan Stendahl7, Christopher D. Philipson8, Grzegorz Mikusiński4, Erik Andersson9, Bertil Westerlund10, Henrik Andrén4, Fredrik Moberg11, Jon Moen3, Jan Bengtsson1
1Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7044, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
2Department of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Durham University, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK
3Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, Umeå, SE-90187, Sweden
4Department of Ecology, Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Riddarhyttan, SE-730 91, Sweden
5Environmental Change Institute, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK
6Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7082, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden,
7Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7014, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
8Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Winterhurerstrasse 190, Zurich, 8057, Switzerland
9Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 49, SE-23053 Alnarp, Sweden
10Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7001, SE-90183 Umeå, Sweden,
11Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm SE-10691, Sweden

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis World Resources Institute. 100 (Island Press (2005).

Naeem S., Bunker D. E., Hector A., Loreau M., Perrings C. H. Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, & Human Wellbeing, an Ecological and Economic Perspective Oxford University Press, (2009).

Cardinale B. J. et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486, 59–67 (2012).

Schmid B. et al. in Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, & Human Wellbeing: An Ecological and Economic Perspective eds Naeem S. Oxford University Press (2009).

Cardinale B. J. et al. The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. Am. J. Bot. 98, 572–592 (2011).

Wardle D. A., Jonsson M. Biodiversity effects in real ecosystems—a response to Duffy. Front. Ecol. Environ. 8, 10–11 (2010).

Wardle D. A., Zackrisson O. Effects of species and functional group loss on island ecosystem properties. Nature 435, 806–810 (2005).

Reich P. B. et al. Impacts of biodiversity loss escalate through time as redundancy fades. Science 336, 589–592 (2012).

Naeem S., Bunker D. E., Hector A., Loreau M., Perrings C. H. in Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, & Human Wellbeing : An Ecological and Economic Perspective (eds Naeem S Ch. 1, 3–13 Oxford University Press (2009).

Grace J. B. et al. Does species diversity limit productivity in natural grassland communities? Ecol. Lett. 10, 680–689 (2007).

Vila M. et al. Species richness and wood production: a positive association in Mediterranean forests. Ecol. Lett. 10, 241–250 (2007).

Paquette A., Messier C. The effect of biodiversity on tree productivity: from temperate to boreal forests. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 20, 170–180 (2011).

Hector A., Bagchi R. Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature 448, 188–190 (2007).

Gamfeldt L., Hillebrand H., Jonsson P. R. Multiple functions increase the importance of biodiversity for overall ecosystem functioning. Ecology 89, 1223–1231 (2008).

Zavaleta E. S., Pasari J. R., Hulvey K. B., Tilman G. D. Sustaining multiple ecosystem functions in grassland communities requires higher biodiversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1443–1446 (2010).

Maestre F. T. et al. Plant species richness and ecosystem multifunctionality in global drylands. Science 335, 214–218 (2012).

Larigauderie A., Mooney H. A. The Intergovernmental science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: moving a step closer to an IPCC-like mechanism for biodiversity. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2, 9–14 (2010).

Hansen M. C., Stehman S. V., Potapov P. V. Quantification of global gross forest cover loss. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 8650–8655 (2010).

Frivold L. H., Frank J. Growth of mixed birch-coniferous stands in relation to pure coniferous stands at similar sites in south-eastern Norway. Scand. J. Forest Res. 17, 139–149 (2002).

Pretzsch H., Schutze G. Transgressive overyielding in mixed compared with pure stands of Norway spruce and European beech in Central Europe: evidence on stand level and explanation on individual tree level. Eur. J. Forest Res. 128, 183–204 (2009).

Bonan G. B. Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320, 1444–1449 (2008).

Janisch J. E., Harmon M. E. Successional changes in live and dead wood carbon stores: implications for net ecosystem productivity. Tree Physiol. 22, 77–89 (2002).

Mace G. M., Norris K., Fitter A. H. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 19–26 (2012).

Cotta H.v. Anweisung zum Waldbau Arnoldische Buchhandlung (1828).

Pretzsch H. in Forest Diversity and Function Vol. Ecological Studies eds Scherer-Lorenzen M., Körner C., Schulze E. D. 41–64Springer-Verlag (2005).

Hooper D. U., Vitousek P. M. Effects of plant composition and diversity on nutrient cycling. Ecol. Monogr. 68, 121–149 (1998).

Duffy J. E., Richardson J. P., Canuel E. A. Grazer diversity effects on ecosystem functioning in seagrass beds. Ecol. Lett. 6, 637–645 (2003).

Miina J., Hotanen J. P., Salo K. Modelling the abundance and temporal variation in the production of bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) in Finnish mineral soil forests. Silva. Fenn. 43, 577–593 (2009).

Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. in Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010: Main Report FAO Forestry Paper Rome (2010).

Swedish Forest Agency. Statistical Yearbook of Forestry 2012: Official Statistics of Sweden Jönköping (2012).

Anderson R. C., Loucks O. L., Swain A. M. Herbaceous response to canopy cover light intensity and throughfall precipitation in coniferous forests. Ecology 50, 255–263 (1969).

Nelson E. et al. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7, 4–11 (2009).

Raudsepp-Hearne C., Peterson G. D., Bennett E. M. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5242–5247 (2010).

Schnitzer S. A. et al. Soil microbes drive the classic plant diversity-productivity pattern. Ecology 92, 296–303 (2010).

Godbold J. A., Solan M. Relative importance of biodiversity and the abiotic environment in mediating an ecosystem process. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 396, 273–282 (2009).

Dise N. B., Rothwell J. J., Gauci V., van der Salm C., de Vries W. Predicting dissolved inorganic nitrogen leaching in European forests using two independent databases. Sci. Total Environ. 407, 1798–1808 (2009).

Bulling M. T. et al. Marine biodiversity-ecosystem functions under uncertain environmental futures. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 2107–2116 (2010).

Hickler T. et al. Projecting the future distribution of European potential natural vegetation zones with a generalized, tree species-based dynamic vegetation model. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 21, 50–63 (2012).

Scherer-Lorenzen M., Körner C., Schulze E. D. Forest Diversity and Function Vol. 176, (Springer-Verlag (2005).

Morin X., Fahse L., Scherer-Lorenzen M., Bugmann H. Tree species richness promotes productivity in temperate forests through strong complementarity between species. Ecol. Lett. 14, 1211–1219 (2011).

Caspersen J. P., Pacala S. W. Successional diversity and forest ecosystem function. Ecol. Res. 16, 895–903 (2001).

Worm B. et al. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314, 787–790 (2006).

Danovaro R. et al. Exponential decline of deep-sea ecosystem functioning linked to benthic biodiversity loss. Curr. Biol. 18, 1–8 (2008).

Mora C. et al. Global human footprint on the linkage between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in reef fishes. PLoS Biol. 9, e1000606 (2011).

Ptacnik R. et al. Diversity predicts stability and resource use efficiency in natural phytoplankton communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 5134–5138 (2008).

Isbell F. et al. High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services. Nature 477, 199–202 (2011).

Foley J. A. et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478, 337–342 (2011).

Hooper D. U. et al. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature 486, 105–108 (2012).

Shepherd G. The Ecosystem Approach: Learning from Experience IUCN (2008).

Axelsson A.-L. et al. in National Forest Inventories—Pathways for Common Reporting eds Tomppo E., Gschwantner Th., Lawrence M., McRoberts R. E. 541–553Springer (2010).

Gelman A., Carlin J. B., Stern H. S., Rubin D. B. Bayesian Data Analysis 2nd edn CRC Press (2004).

Spiegelhalter D. J., Best N. G., Carlin B. R., van der Linde A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 64, 583–616 (2002).

Thomas A., O’Hara R. B., Ligges U., Sturtz S. Making BUGS open. R News 6, 12–17 (2006).

Marklund L. G. Biomass Functions for Pine, Spruce and Birch in Sweden Department of Forest Survey, SLU (1988).

Petersson H., Ståhl G. Functions for Below-Ground Biomass of Pinus Sylvestris, Picea Abies, Betula Pendula and Betula Pubescens in Sweden Department of Forest Resource Management and Geomatics, SLU (2006).

Cederlund G., Ljungqvist H., Markgren G., Stålfelt F. Foods of moose and roe deer at Grimsö in central Sweden—results of rumen content analysis. Swed. Wildlife Res. 11, 167–247 (1980).

Hanley T. A. A nutritional view of understanding and complexity in the problem of diet selection by deer (Cervidae). Oikos 79, 209–218 (1997).

Boman M., Mattsson L., Ericsson G. R., Kriström B. Moose hunting values in Sweden now and two decades ago: the Swedish hunters revisited. Environ. Resource Econ. 50, 515–530 (2011).

National Atlas of Sweden. The Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry. Agriculture and Forestry in Sweden Since 1900 – a Cartographic Description 232 (Stockholm (2011).

Warfvinge P., Sverdrup H. Critical Loads of Acidity to Swedish Forest Soils. Methods, Data and Results 104 (Lund (1995).