Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis World Resources Institute. 100 (Island Press (2005).
Naeem S., Bunker D. E., Hector A., Loreau M., Perrings C. H. Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, & Human Wellbeing, an Ecological and Economic Perspective Oxford University Press, (2009).
Schmid B. et al. in Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, & Human Wellbeing: An Ecological and Economic Perspective eds Naeem S. Oxford University Press (2009).
Cardinale B. J. et al. The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. Am. J. Bot. 98, 572–592 (2011).
Wardle D. A., Jonsson M. Biodiversity effects in real ecosystems—a response to Duffy. Front. Ecol. Environ. 8, 10–11 (2010).
Wardle D. A., Zackrisson O. Effects of species and functional group loss on island ecosystem properties. Nature 435, 806–810 (2005).
Reich P. B. et al. Impacts of biodiversity loss escalate through time as redundancy fades. Science 336, 589–592 (2012).
Naeem S., Bunker D. E., Hector A., Loreau M., Perrings C. H. in Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, & Human Wellbeing : An Ecological and Economic Perspective (eds Naeem S Ch. 1, 3–13 Oxford University Press (2009).
Grace J. B. et al. Does species diversity limit productivity in natural grassland communities? Ecol. Lett. 10, 680–689 (2007).
Vila M. et al. Species richness and wood production: a positive association in Mediterranean forests. Ecol. Lett. 10, 241–250 (2007).
Paquette A., Messier C. The effect of biodiversity on tree productivity: from temperate to boreal forests. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 20, 170–180 (2011).
Gamfeldt L., Hillebrand H., Jonsson P. R. Multiple functions increase the importance of biodiversity for overall ecosystem functioning. Ecology 89, 1223–1231 (2008).
Zavaleta E. S., Pasari J. R., Hulvey K. B., Tilman G. D. Sustaining multiple ecosystem functions in grassland communities requires higher biodiversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1443–1446 (2010).
Maestre F. T. et al. Plant species richness and ecosystem multifunctionality in global drylands. Science 335, 214–218 (2012).
Larigauderie A., Mooney H. A. The Intergovernmental science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: moving a step closer to an IPCC-like mechanism for biodiversity. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2, 9–14 (2010).
Hansen M. C., Stehman S. V., Potapov P. V. Quantification of global gross forest cover loss. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 8650–8655 (2010).
Frivold L. H., Frank J. Growth of mixed birch-coniferous stands in relation to pure coniferous stands at similar sites in south-eastern Norway. Scand. J. Forest Res. 17, 139–149 (2002).
Pretzsch H., Schutze G. Transgressive overyielding in mixed compared with pure stands of Norway spruce and European beech in Central Europe: evidence on stand level and explanation on individual tree level. Eur. J. Forest Res. 128, 183–204 (2009).
Bonan G. B. Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320, 1444–1449 (2008).
Janisch J. E., Harmon M. E. Successional changes in live and dead wood carbon stores: implications for net ecosystem productivity. Tree Physiol. 22, 77–89 (2002).
Mace G. M., Norris K., Fitter A. H. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 19–26 (2012).
Cotta H.v. Anweisung zum Waldbau Arnoldische Buchhandlung (1828).
Pretzsch H. in Forest Diversity and Function Vol. Ecological Studies eds Scherer-Lorenzen M., Körner C., Schulze E. D. 41–64Springer-Verlag (2005).
Hooper D. U., Vitousek P. M. Effects of plant composition and diversity on nutrient cycling. Ecol. Monogr. 68, 121–149 (1998).
Duffy J. E., Richardson J. P., Canuel E. A. Grazer diversity effects on ecosystem functioning in seagrass beds. Ecol. Lett. 6, 637–645 (2003).
Miina J., Hotanen J. P., Salo K. Modelling the abundance and temporal variation in the production of bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) in Finnish mineral soil forests. Silva. Fenn. 43, 577–593 (2009).
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. in Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010: Main Report FAO Forestry Paper Rome (2010).
Swedish Forest Agency. Statistical Yearbook of Forestry 2012: Official Statistics of Sweden Jönköping (2012).
Anderson R. C., Loucks O. L., Swain A. M. Herbaceous response to canopy cover light intensity and throughfall precipitation in coniferous forests. Ecology 50, 255–263 (1969).
Nelson E. et al. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7, 4–11 (2009).
Raudsepp-Hearne C., Peterson G. D., Bennett E. M. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5242–5247 (2010).
Schnitzer S. A. et al. Soil microbes drive the classic plant diversity-productivity pattern. Ecology 92, 296–303 (2010).
Godbold J. A., Solan M. Relative importance of biodiversity and the abiotic environment in mediating an ecosystem process. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 396, 273–282 (2009).
Dise N. B., Rothwell J. J., Gauci V., van der Salm C., de Vries W. Predicting dissolved inorganic nitrogen leaching in European forests using two independent databases. Sci. Total Environ. 407, 1798–1808 (2009).
Bulling M. T. et al. Marine biodiversity-ecosystem functions under uncertain environmental futures. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 2107–2116 (2010).
Hickler T. et al. Projecting the future distribution of European potential natural vegetation zones with a generalized, tree species-based dynamic vegetation model. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 21, 50–63 (2012).
Scherer-Lorenzen M., Körner C., Schulze E. D. Forest Diversity and Function Vol. 176, (Springer-Verlag (2005).
Morin X., Fahse L., Scherer-Lorenzen M., Bugmann H. Tree species richness promotes productivity in temperate forests through strong complementarity between species. Ecol. Lett. 14, 1211–1219 (2011).
Caspersen J. P., Pacala S. W. Successional diversity and forest ecosystem function. Ecol. Res. 16, 895–903 (2001).
Worm B. et al. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314, 787–790 (2006).
Danovaro R. et al. Exponential decline of deep-sea ecosystem functioning linked to benthic biodiversity loss. Curr. Biol. 18, 1–8 (2008).
Mora C. et al. Global human footprint on the linkage between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in reef fishes. PLoS Biol. 9, e1000606 (2011).
Ptacnik R. et al. Diversity predicts stability and resource use efficiency in natural phytoplankton communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 5134–5138 (2008).
Isbell F. et al. High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services. Nature 477, 199–202 (2011).
Hooper D. U. et al. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature 486, 105–108 (2012).
Axelsson A.-L. et al. in National Forest Inventories—Pathways for Common Reporting eds Tomppo E., Gschwantner Th., Lawrence M., McRoberts R. E. 541–553Springer (2010).
Spiegelhalter D. J., Best N. G., Carlin B. R., van der Linde A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 64, 583–616 (2002).
Thomas A., O’Hara R. B., Ligges U., Sturtz S. Making BUGS open. R News 6, 12–17 (2006).
Marklund L. G. Biomass Functions for Pine, Spruce and Birch in Sweden Department of Forest Survey, SLU (1988).
Petersson H., Ståhl G. Functions for Below-Ground Biomass of Pinus Sylvestris, Picea Abies, Betula Pendula and Betula Pubescens in Sweden Department of Forest Resource Management and Geomatics, SLU (2006).
Cederlund G., Ljungqvist H., Markgren G., Stålfelt F. Foods of moose and roe deer at Grimsö in central Sweden—results of rumen content analysis. Swed. Wildlife Res. 11, 167–247 (1980).
Hanley T. A. A nutritional view of understanding and complexity in the problem of diet selection by deer (Cervidae). Oikos 79, 209–218 (1997).
Boman M., Mattsson L., Ericsson G. R., Kriström B. Moose hunting values in Sweden now and two decades ago: the Swedish hunters revisited. Environ. Resource Econ. 50, 515–530 (2011).
National Atlas of Sweden. The Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry. Agriculture and Forestry in Sweden Since 1900 – a Cartographic Description 232 (Stockholm (2011).
Warfvinge P., Sverdrup H. Critical Loads of Acidity to Swedish Forest Soils. Methods, Data and Results 104 (Lund (1995).