High school teachers use of writing to support students’ learning: a national survey
Tóm tắt
A random sample of language arts, social studies, science, and math high school teachers from across the United States were surveyed about their use of writing to support student learning. Four out of every five teachers reported they used writing to support student learning, applying on average 24 different writing activities across the school year, with nine activities applied by at least one-half of the teachers once a month or more often. Teachers’ responses, however, raised several concerns. One, a majority of teachers indicted they did not receive adequate preservice or inservice preparation on how to use writing to support learning (this issue was especially acute for science and math teachers). Two, many of the nine most commonly applied writing to learn activities involved little or no analysis, interpretation, or personalization of information to be learned. Three, use of writing activities involving the use of digital tools, report writing, and written arguments were infrequent. Such activities are stressed by the Common Core State Standards. Four, when respondents taught students how to apply writing to learn activities, they only used effective teaching practices slightly more than one half of the time (math teachers did this even less often). We further found that use of writing to support learning was related to teachers’ preparation to apply such strategies, perceptions of capabilities to teach and use these tools, and percent of below average students in the class.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Applebee, A. (1984). Writing and reasoning. Review of Educational Research, 54, 577–596.
Applebee, A., & Langer, J. (2011). A snapshot of writing instruction in middle and high schools. English Journal, 100, 14–27.
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74, 29–58.
Bridge, C. A., & Hiebert, E. H. (1985). A comparison of classroom writing practices, teachers’ perceptions of their writing instruction, and textbook recommendations on writing practices. Elementary School Journal, 86, 155–172.
Common Core State Standards: National Governors Association and Council of Chief School Officers. (2010). http://www.corestandards.org/.
Cutler, L., & Graham, S. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 907–919.
Dillman, D. (2000). Mail and internet surveys (2nd ed.). NY: Wiley.
Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28(122), 128.
Gilbert, J., & Graham, S. (2010). Teaching writing to elementary students in grades 4 to 6: A national survey. Elementary School Journal, 110, 494–518.
Graham, S., Cappizi, A., Harris, K. R., Hebert, M., & Morphy, P. (in press). Teaching writing to middle school students: A national survey. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal.
Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2011). Writing-to-read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard Educational Review, 81, 710–744.
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing Next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Kiuhara, S., Graham, S., & Hawken, L. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 136–160.
Klein, P. (1999). Reopening inquiry into cognitive processes in writing-to-learn. Educational Psychology Review, 11, 203–270.
Klein, P. (2000). Elementary students’ strategies for writing-to-learn in science. Cognition & Instruction, 18, 317–348.
Klein, P., & Kirkpatrick, L. (2010). A framework for content area writing: Mediators and moderators. Journal of Writing Research, 2, 1–46.
Pressley, M., & Harris, K. R. (1990). What is really known about cognitive strategy instruction. Educational Leadership, 48, 31–34.
Pressley, M., Harris, K. R., & Marks, M. (1992). But good strategy instructions are constructivists! Educational Psychology Review, 4, 3–31.
Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Rankin, J., Mistretta, J., & Yokoi, L. (1996). The nature of outstanding primary-grades literacy instruction. In E. McIntyre & M. Pressley (Eds.), Balanced instruction: Strategies and skills in whole language (pp. 251–276). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
Rivard, L. P. (1994). A review of writing to learn in science: Implications for practice and research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 969–983.
Russell, D. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14, 504–554.
Stotsky, S. (1982). The role of writing in developmental reading. Journal of Reading, 46, 320–340.