Help wanted? Employers' use of temporary agencies in the UK construction industry

Employee Relations - Tập 30 Số 6 - Trang 679-698 - 2008
ChrisForde1, RobertMacKenzie1, AndrewRobinson1
1Leeds University Business School, Leeds, UK

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore the dynamics between employers' use of temporary agency workers and the aspirations of agencies to expand their role further within organisations.Design/methodology/approachThe study focuses on the construction sector in the UK. A mixed methods approach is employed comprising a quantitative survey and qualitative interviews with construction employers.FindingsConstruction employers' use of temporary agency workers remains driven by “traditional” reasons, to meet short‐term peaks in demand and for one‐off tasks. Construction employers have widespread reservations about the use of temporary agency workers. There is little evidence of an expansion in the range of tasks or managerial functions being performed by agencies in construction. Together, these findings point to limits to the inexorable expansion of temporary agencies in the sector.Research limitations/implicationsFurther research is needed to assess the extent to which these reservations surrounding agencies, and the limits on the expansion of agencies that these reservations imply, are applicable to sectors outside construction.Practical implicationsEmployers' lack of appetite for agency workers stem from perceived problems of quality of agency labour and a desire to maintain control over production. These reservations suggest that agency aspirations to increase their role and functions further in the construction sector are likely to be frustrated.Originality/valueMuch research has pointed to the growth of agency working in recent years. The principal value of this research is in highlighting the potential limits to the inexorable expansion of agency working. The paper also reveals employers' reservations towards agencies, which have been neglected in the literature to date.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Adnett, N. and Hardy, S. (2001), “Reviewing the working time directive: rationale, implementation and case law”, Industrial Relations Journal, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 114‐25.

Autor, D. (2001), “Why do temporary help firms provide free general skills training?”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 116 No. 4, pp. 1409‐48.

Bergström, O. (2003), “Beyond atypicality”, in Bergström, O. and Storrie, D. (Eds), Contingent Employment in Europe and the US, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Biggs, D. and Swailes, S. (2006), “Relations, commitment and satisfaction in agency workers and permanent workers”, Employee Relations, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 130‐43.

CIETT (2000), Orchestrating the Evolution of Private Employment Agencies Towards a Stronger Society, Confederation Internationale des Entreprises de Travail Temporaire, Brussels.

CITB (2003), The Effect of Employment Status on Investment in Training, Construction Industry Training Board, King‘s Lynn.

CITB – Construction Skills (2004), Skills Needs, Training Practices and Barriers to Training in West Yorkshire Construction Sector, Construction Industry Training Board, King‘s Lynn.

Clarke, L. and Wall, C. (1998), A Blueprint for Change: Construction Skills Training in Britain, Policy Press, Bristol.

Cully, M., Woodland, S., O'Reilly, A. and Dix, G. (1999), Britain at Work, Routledge, London.

De Cuyper, N. and De Witte, H. (2007), “Associations between contract preference and attitudes, well‐being and behavioural intentions of temporary workers”, Economic and Industrial Democracy, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 292‐312.

Druker, J. and Stanworth, C. (2001), “Partnerships and the private recruitment industry”, Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 73‐89.

Finegold, D., Levenson, A. and Van Buren, M. (2005), “Access to training and its impact on temporary workers”, Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 66‐86.

Forde, C. (2001), “Temporary arrangements: the activities of employment agencies in the UK”, Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 631‐44.

Forde, C. and Mackenzie, R. (2004), “Cementing skills: training and labour utilisation in the UK construction and civil engineering sector”, Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 74‐88.

Forde, C. and MacKenzie, R. (2006), “Concrete solutions? Recruitment difficulties and casualisation in the UK construction industry”, in Dainty, A., Baginhole, B. and Green, S. (Eds), People and Culture in Construction: A Reader, Taylor and Francis, London.

Forde, C. and Slater, G. (2006), “The nature and experience of agency working in Britain: what are the challenges for human resource management?”, Personnel Review, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 141‐57.

Henson, J. (1991), “United States business interests in the structure of state‐society relation in Mexico, 1920‐1935”, PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.

Houseman, S. (2001), “Why employers use flexible staffing arrangements: evidence from an establishment survey”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 55 No. 1, pp. 149‐70.

Houseman, S., Kalleberg, A. and Erickcek, G. (2003), “The role of temporary agency employment in tight labor markets”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 57 No. 1, pp. 105‐27.

Hunter, L. and MacInnes, J. (1991), Employers Labour Use Strategies: Case Studies, Department of Employment Research Paper 87, Department of Employment, London.

Kalleberg, A. and Marsden, P. (2005), “Externalising organisational activities: where and how US establishments use employment intermediaries”, Socio‐Economic Review, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 389‐416.

Koene, B., Paauwe, J. and Groenewegen, J. (2004), “Understanding the development of temporary agency work in Europe”, Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 53‐73.

Lautsch, B. (2002), “Uncovering and explaining variance in the features and outcomes of contingent work”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 56 No. 1, pp. 23‐43.

McGregor, A. and Sproull, A. (1991), Employer Labour Use Strategies: Analysis of a National Survey, Employment Department Research Series, No. 83, Department of Employment, London.

Millward, N., Bryson, A. and Forth, J. (2000), All Change at Work? British Employee Relations 1980‐1998 as Portrayed by the Workplace Industrial Relations Survey Series, Routledge, London.

Osterman, P. and Burton, D. (2004), “Poters and ladders: the nature and relevance of internal labor markets in a changing world”, in Ackroyd, S., Batt, R., Thompson, P. and Tolbert, P. (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Work and Organisation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Peck, J. and Theodore, N. (2002), “Temped out: industry rhetoric, labor regulation and economic restructuring in the temporary staffing business”, Economic and Industrial Democracy, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 143‐75.

Peck, J., Theodore, N. and Ward, K. (2005), “Global push: constructing ‘Emerging Markets’ in the Temporary Staffing Industry”, Global Networks, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 3‐26.

Potts, P., Rhodes, J., Rideout, R., Smith, C. and Wardell, E. (1968), Certain Matters Concerning Labour in Building and Civil Engineering: Report of the Committee of Enquiry under Professor E.H. Phelps‐Brown, Cmnd 3714‐I, HMSO, London.

Purcell, J., Purcell, K. and Tailby, S. (2004), “Temporary work agencies: here today, gone tomorrow?”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 705‐25.

Silla, I., Gracia, F. and Peiró, J. (2005), “Job insecurity and health‐related outcomes among different types of temporary workers”, Economic and Industrial Democracy, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 89‐117.

Torka, N. and Schyns, B. (2007), “On the transferability of traditional satisfaction theory to non‐traditional employment relationships: temp agency work satisfaction”, Employee Relations, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 440‐57.

Trades Union Congress (2007), Agency Workers: Counting the Cost of Flexibility, TUC Equality and Employment Right Units, London.

Union of Construction, Allied Trades and Technicians (UCATT) (2004), “Motions carried at the UCATT national delegate conference, Scarborough, 7‐11 June 2004”, Building Worker, No. 24, UCATT, London.

Ward, K., Grimshaw, D., Rubery, J. and Beynon, H. (2001), “Dilemmas in the management of temporary work agency staff”, Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 3‐21.

White, M., Hill, S., Mills, C. and Smeaton, D. (2004), Managing to Change? British Workplaces and the Future of Work, Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Burgess, J. and Connell, J. (2004), “International aspects of temporary agency employment”, in Burgess, J. and Connell, J. (Eds), International Perspectives on Temporary Agency Work, Routledge, London.

Forde, C. and Slater, G. (2005), “Agency working in Britain: character, consequences and regulation”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 249‐71.

Gallagher, D. and Sverke, M. (2005), “Contingent employment contracts: are existing employment theories still relevant?”, Economic and Industrial Democracy, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 181‐203.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Employee Relations

Tập 30 Số 6

679-698

Thông tin tác giả