He is a Stud, She is a Slut! A Meta-Analysis on the Continued Existence of Sexual Double Standards

Personality and Social Psychology Review - Tập 24 Số 2 - Trang 163-190 - 2020
Joyce J. Endendijk1, Anneloes L. van Baar1, Maja Deković1
1Utrecht University, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

(Hetero)sexual double standards (SDS) entail that different sexual behaviors are appropriate for men and women. This meta-analysis ( k = 99; N = 123,343) tested predictions of evolutionary and biosocial theories regarding the existence of SDS in social cognitions. Databases were searched for studies examining attitudes or stereotypes regarding the sexual behaviors of men versus women. Studies assessing differences in evaluations, or expectations, of men’s and women’s sexual behavior yielded evidence for traditional SDS ( d = 0.25). For men, frequent sexual activity was more expected, and evaluated more positively, than for women. Studies using Likert-type-scale questionnaires did not yield evidence of SDS (combined M = −0.09). Effects were moderated by level of gender equality in the country in which the study was conducted, SDS-operationalization (attitudes vs. stereotypes), questionnaire type, and sexual behavior type. Results are consistent with a hybrid model incorporating both evolutionary and sociocultural factors contributing to SDS.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bandura R., 2008, A survey of composite indices measuring country performance

*Barron S. R. B., 2010, Perceptions of sexual coercion: Understanding the role of gender, intimacy, and alcohol use

10.1037/10325-001

Borenstein M., 2005, Comprehensive meta-analysis

10.1002/9780470743386

Buss D. M., 1994, American Scientist, 82, 238

Cohen J., 1977, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences

*Donald A. R., 1983, Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 957

Eagly A. H., 1987, Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation

Han J., 2006, Data mining: Concepts and techniques, 2

*Hearn K. D., 2001, Predictors of health protective sexual communication among black women and men

Hill C., 2011, Crossing the line: Sexual harassment at school

10.1007/978-1-4899-0354-9_10

*Hong J., 2013, Sexuality professionals’ attitudes toward five dimensions of human sexuality

Hyde J. S., 1997, Understanding human sexuality, 6

*Isarabhakdi P., 1999, Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, 1932A

*Javier K. N., 2018, Asian American women: The influence of sororities and little sister programs

*Kleinfelter K. J., 1999, An investigation of college students’ personal attitudes and subjective norms regarding acceptability of assertive and nontraditional sexual behavior in women: Re-examining the sexual double standard

Muehlenhard C. L., 1998, Handbook of sexuality-related measures, 199

*Murstein B. I., 1994, Adolescence, 29, 303

*Ortiz R. R., 2012, Subverting the sexual double standard: How exposure to and identification with characters in televised counter sexual scripts affect young women’s sexual well-being

Raudenbush S. W., 2002, Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods, 1

10.1007/978-3-319-09384-0_11

Schwartz P., 2000, The gender of sexuality, 2

*Sierra J. C., 2007, International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 7, 41

Stangor C., 1996, Stereotypes and stereotyping, 3

Tabachnick B. G., 2012, Using multivariate statistics, 6

Trivers R. L., 1972, Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871-1971, 136

10.1016/B978-0-12-394281-4.00002-7

*Young M., 2010, American Journal of Health Studies, 25, 156