Have C hinese water pricing reforms reduced urban residential water demand?
Tóm tắt
China continues to deal with severe levels of water scarcity and water pollution. To help address this situation, the Chinese central government initiated urban water pricing reforms in 2002 that emphasized the adoption of increasing block rate (IBR) price structures in place of existing uniform rate structures. By combining urban water use records with microlevel data from the Chinese Urban Household Survey, this research investigates the effectiveness of this national policy reform. Specifically, we compare household water consumption in 28 cities that adopted IBR pricing structures during 2002–2009, with that of 110 cities that had not yet done so. Based on difference‐in‐differences models, our results show that the policy reform reduced annual residential water demand by 3–4% in the short run and 5% in the longer run. These relatively modest reductions are consistent with the generous nature of the IBR pricing structures that Chinese cities have typically chosen to implement. Our results imply that more efforts are needed to address China's persistent urban water scarcity challenges.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Asian Development Bank (ADB)(2016) Asian Water Development Outlook. Manila Philippines. [Available athttps://www.adb.org/publications/asian-water-development-outlook-2016.]
Baerenklau K. A.(2015) Demand and welfare effects of block rate water pricing in4th Annual Summer Conference Assoc. of Environ. and Resour. Econ. San Diego Calif.
Borenstein S.(2008) Equity effects of increasing block electricity pricing inCenter for the Study of Energy Markets (CSEM) Working Paper Series Univ. of Calif. Energy Inst. Berkeley.
Fu T., 2008, Reform of China's Urban Water Sector
Jia S. F., 2004, Report of China's Water Resources Security
Liu Y. H., 2008, Status in quo of water price renovation in Shenzhen and countermeasures, J. Econ. Water Resour., 3
National Development and Reform Commission(2013) Guidance on Establishing and Completing Urban Residential Water Block Tariff.
Piper S.(2013) Effectiveness of conservation pricing in reducing residential water demand—Evidence from increasing block rate structures in52nd Annual Meeting West. Reg. Sci. Assoc Santa Barbara Calif.
Salazar D.(2016) Recall successful in Yorba Linda water board; City Council adding two new faces.The Orange County Register. [Available athttp://www.ocregister.com/2016/11/09/recall-successful-in-yorba-linda-water-board-city-council-adding-two-new-faces/.]
Sibly H., 2006, Urban water pricing, Agenda, 13, 17
Stevens M.(2016) Yorba Linda legal fight turns nasty as residents seek to overturn water rate hike Lost Angeles Times. [Available athttp://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-yorba-linda-water-rates-snap-story.html.]
UN‐Water(2003) The United Nations World Water development report 1 Water for People. Water for Life UNESCO Paris France.
Wlodarz M. andR.Griffin(2014) Urban water demand and water rates structure over decades inFifth World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists Istanbul Turkey.