HTMT2–an improved criterion for assessing discriminant validity in structural equation modeling

Industrial Management and Data Systems - Tập 121 Số 12 - Trang 2637-2650 - 2021
Ellen Roemer1, Florian Schuberth2, Jörg Henseler2
1Department of Business Administration and Economics, Hochschule Ruhr West, Mulheim an der Ruhr, Germany
2Department of Design, Production and Management, Universiteit Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

PurposeOne popular method to assess discriminant validity in structural equation modeling is the heterotrait-monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT). However, the HTMT assumes tau-equivalent measurement models, which are unlikely to hold for most empirical studies. To relax this assumption, the authors modify the original HTMT and introduce a new consistent measure for congeneric measurement models: the HTMT2.Design/methodology/approachThe HTMT2 is designed in analogy to the HTMT but relies on the geometric mean instead of the arithmetic mean. A Monte Carlo simulation compares the performance of the HTMT and the HTMT2. In the simulation, several design factors are varied such as loading patterns, sample sizes and inter-construct correlations in order to compare the estimation bias of the two criteria.FindingsThe HTMT2 provides less biased estimations of the correlations among the latent variables compared to the HTMT, in particular if indicators loading patterns are heterogeneous. Consequently, the HTMT2 should be preferred over the HTMT to assess discriminant validity in case of congeneric measurement models.Research limitations/implicationsHowever, the HTMT2 can only be determined if all correlations between involved observable variables are positive.Originality/valueThis paper introduces the HTMT2 as an improved version of the traditional HTMT. Compared to other approaches assessing discriminant validity, the HTMT2 provides two advantages: (1) the ease of its computation, since HTMT2 is only based on the indicator correlations, and (2) the relaxed assumption of tau-equivalence. The authors highly recommend the HTMT2 criterion over the traditional HTMT for assessing discriminant validity in empirical studies.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

2018, Statistical inference with PLSc using bootstrap confidence intervals, MIS Quarterly, 42, 1001, 10.25300/MISQ/2018/13587

1982, Representing and testing organizational theories: a holistic construal, Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 459, 10.2307/2392322

1984, Multiple indicators: internal consistency or no necessary relationship?, Quality and Quantity, 18, 377

1991, Conventional wisdom on measurement: a structural equation perspective, Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305, 10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.305

1959, Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix, Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81, 10.1037/h0046016

Chin, W.W. (1998), “The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling”, in Marcoulides, G.A. (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 295-336.

2001, Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development, Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 269, 10.1509/jmkr.38.2.269.18845

Dijkstra, T.K. (2017), “A perfect match between a model and a mode”, in Latan, H. and Noonan, R. (Eds), Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: Basic Concepts, Methodological Issues and Applications, Springer, Cham, pp. 55-80.

1982, Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory, Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 440, 10.1177/002224378201900406

1981, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39, 10.1177/002224378101800104

2019, Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: a comparison of four procedures, Internet Research, 29, 430, 10.1108/IntR-12-2017-0515

2013, Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact, MIS Quarterly, 37, 337, 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.01

2017, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd ed.

2021, Composite-Based Structural Equation Modeling: Analyzing Latent and Emergent Variables

2014, Common beliefs and reality about PLS: comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013), Organizational Research Methods, 17, 182, 10.1177/1094428114526928

2015, A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 1

1971, Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests, Psychometrika, 36, 109, 10.1007/BF02291393

1975, Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 631, 10.2307/2285946

1998, Conditions for factor (in)determinacy in factor analysis, Psychometrika, 63, 359, 10.1007/BF02294860

1968, Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores

2018, Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here, Psychological Methods, 23, 412, 10.1037/met0000144

2003, Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications

1982, The polyserial correlation coefficient, Psychometrika, 47, 337, 10.1007/BF02294164

1986, Relationships among research design choices and psychometric properties of rating scales: a meta-analysis, Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 1, 10.1177/002224378602300101

R Core Team, 2020, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing

Rademaker, M.E. and Schuberth, F. (2020), “cSEM: composite-based structural equation modeling”, Package version: 0.4.0.9000, available at: https://m-e-rademaker.github.io/cSEM/.

2020, An updated guideline for assessing discriminant validity, Organizational Research Methods, 1, 10.1177/1094428120968614

2018, Confirmatory composite analysis, Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02541

2009, On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of cronbach's alpha, Psychometrika, 74, 107, 10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0

2002, Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th ed.

2016, Discriminant validity testing in marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44, 119, 10.1007/s11747-015-0455-4

Wold, H. (1982), “Soft modeling: the basic design and some extensions”, in Jöreskog, K.G. and Wold, H. (Eds), Systems under Indirect Observation: Causality, Structure, Prediction Part II, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 1-54.

2007, Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales, Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6, 4