Grower perceptions of native pollinators and pollination strategies in the lowbush blueberry industry

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems - Tập 30 Số 2 - Trang 124-131 - 2015
Samuel P. Hanes1, Kourtney Collum1, Aaron Kinyu Hoshide2, Eric Asare2
1Department of Anthropology,University of Maine,Orono, Maine,USA.
2School of Economics,University of Maine,Orono, Maine,USA.

Tóm tắt

AbstractPollinator declines and dependence on insect pollination, particularly in fruit and vegetable crops, creates a pressing need to understand growers' interactions with pollinators and factors affecting pollination strategies. At present, many growers are dependent on commercial honey bees (Apis mellifera), but diversified strategies may be necessary to secure adequate crop pollination in the future. As of yet, little social science research exists on pollination practices. This article presents the results of a survey of lowbush blueberry growers in Maine. The survey was part of a five-year pollination security study focusing on four fruit and vegetables crops in the Northeast US. The survey assesses grower perceptions of native pollinators' effectiveness and their perceptions of native pollinators' contribution to fruit set. Results indicate a widespread perception among growers of native pollinators' importance. While native pollinators are not effective enough to replace rented honey bees for three-quarters of the industry, they are broadly seen as an important form of insurance in poor weather when honey bees' effectiveness is reduced. The main obstacle to greater utilization of native pollinators found in this study was uncertainty over native pollinators' contribution to yield and the associated difficulty monitoring native pollinators' population size. Scientists and extension experts must work to reduce these obstacles before more widespread use of native pollinators will occur.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

USDA (US Department of Agriculture). 2012. Census of Agriculture, Maine, 1965–2007. Available at Web site http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/AgCensusImages/1945/01/01/1171/Table-02.pdf (verified December 15, 2012).

10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007

10.1080/15538362.2011.619120

10.1016/j.jip.2009.06.011

Rogers, 2003, The Diffusion of Innovations

Yarborough D.E. 2012. Statistics—Wild Blueberry Crop Statistics. University of Maine Cooperative Extension. Available at Web site http://umaine.edu/blueberries/factsheets/statistics-2/statistics/ (verified January 16, 2013).

10.1017/S1742170511000081

10.2489/jswc.66.5.337

10.3896/IBRA.1.48.2.07

van Engelsdorp, 2009, Colony collapse disorder: A descriptive study, PLoS ONE, 4, 1

10.1111/j.1549-0831.2002.tb00096.x

10.1051/apido/2010013

10.1300/J301v03n01_05

Jamieson, 2008, Developing seed-propagated lowbush blueberry families, HortScience, 43, 1686, 10.21273/HORTSCI.43.6.1686

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01157.x

2007, Status of Pollinators in North America

Sumner, 2006, Bee-economics and the leap in pollination fees, Agricultural and Resource Economics Update, 9, 9

10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.561.32

10.1016/j.agee.2011.03.020

Morse, 2000, The value of honey bees as pollinators of U.S. crops in 2000, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 116, 289

10.1073/pnas.1012431108

10.1098/rspb.2002.2306

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.014

10.1126/science.1230200

10.3896/IBRA.1.50.2.07

10.1111/gcb.12043

10.1603/0022-0493-94.3.609

Rose A. 2010. A characterization of Maine blueberry growers in 2010. Masters Thesis, University of Maine, Orono.

Burgett, 2010, U.S. pollination markets: Recent changes and historical perspective, American Bee Journal, 150, 35

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01669.x

Kluser S. and Peduzzi P. 2007. Global Pollinator Decline: A Literature Review. UNEP/GRID-Europe. Available at Web site http://www.grid.unep.ch/products/3_Reports/Global_pollinator_decline_literature_review_2007.pdf (verified January 16, 2013).

10.4236/as.2011.23043

10.1603/0013-8746(2002)095[0345:CPEABH]2.0.CO;2

10.1017/S1068280500007371

Drummond F. 2002. Honey Bees and Blueberry Pollination. Fact sheet No. 629. University of Maine Cooperative Extension.