Greater externalizing personality traits predict less error‐related insula and anterior cingulate cortex activity in acutely abstinent cigarette smokers

Addiction Biology - Tập 20 Số 2 - Trang 377-389 - 2015
Allison J. Carroll1,2, Matthew T. Sutherland3,2, Betty Jo Salmeron2, Thomas J. Ross2, Elliot A. Stein2
1Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, , USA
2Neuroimaging Research Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Intramural Research Program, NIH/DHHS, Baltimore, MD, USA
3Department of Physics, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA

Tóm tắt

Abstract

Attenuated activity in performance‐monitoring brain regions following erroneous actions may contribute to the repetition of maladaptive behaviors such as continued drug use. Externalizing is a broad personality construct characterized by deficient impulse control, vulnerability to addiction and reduced neurobiological indices of error processing. The insula and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) are regions critically linked with error processing as well as the perpetuation of cigarette smoking. As such, we examined the interrelations between externalizing tendencies, erroneous task performance, and error‐related insula and dACC activity in overnight‐deprived smokers (n = 24) and non‐smokers (n = 20). Participants completed a self‐report measure assessing externalizing tendencies (Externalizing Spectrum Inventory) and a speeded Flanker task during functional magnetic resonance imaging scanning. We observed that higher externalizing tendencies correlated with the occurrence of more performance errors among smokers but not non‐smokers. Suggesting a neurobiological contribution to such suboptimal performance among smokers, higher externalizing also predicted less recruitment of the right insula and dACC following error commission. Critically, this error‐related activity fully mediated the relationship between externalizing traits and error rates. That is, higher externalizing scores predicted less error‐related right insula and dACC activity and, in turn, less error‐related activity predicted more errors. Relating such regional activity with a clinically relevant construct, less error‐related right insula and dACC responses correlated with higher tobacco craving during abstinence. Given that inadequate error‐related neuronal responses may contribute to continued drug use despite negative consequences, these results suggest that externalizing tendencies and/or compromised error processing among subsets of smokers may be relevant factors for smoking cessation success.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1037/a0031559

10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07384.x

10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.05.025

10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014

10.1038/nrn2555

10.1080/14622200410001727939

10.1037/1064-1297.14.3.287

10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.009

10.1016/j.neuron.2006.04.031

10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.024

10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03846.x

10.1016/j.biopsych.2003.09.011

10.1073/pnas.0504136102

10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.08.014

10.1007/s00429-010-0259-8

10.1016/j.tics.2005.02.008

10.1176/appi.ajp.159.10.1642

10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.004

10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01899.x

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4692-12.2013

10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.02.003

10.1080/1462220031000158681

10.1080/14622200801908174

10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.035

10.1038/npp.2009.67

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4052-11.2012

10.3389/fnhum.2012.00171

10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00540.x

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-21-07839.2003

10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.008

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3274-10.2010

10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.014

10.3389/fnhum.2013.00014

10.1037/0021-843X.111.3.411

10.1037/0021-843X.116.4.645

10.1300/J029v13n01_04

10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.04.039

10.1016/j.pbb.2010.10.012

10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.12.016

10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.06.003

10.1016/j.tics.2011.08.003

10.1016/j.psychres.2006.05.008

10.1038/mp.2011.88

10.1016/j.tins.2008.09.009

10.1007/s00429-010-0268-7

10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01047.x

10.1016/j.cpr.2008.07.003

10.1017/S0954579412000533

10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.07.020

10.1126/science.1142997

10.3758/BRM.40.3.879

10.1073/pnas.98.2.676

10.1126/science.1100301

10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00714.x

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5587-06.2007

10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.02.005

10.1073/pnas.0800005105

10.1080/14622200210123581

10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.043

10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.117

10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.01.035

10.1007/s00213-013-3018-8

10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.06.010

10.1007/s00429-010-0261-1

10.1080/14622200802239330

10.1037/a0024703

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2966-07.2007

10.1038/nn1727