Governmentality Matters: Designing an Alliance Culture of Inter-Organizational Collaboration for Managing Projects

Organization Studies - Tập 23 Số 3 - Trang 317-337 - 2002
Stewart Clegg1, Tyrone S. Pitsis1, Thekla Rura‐Polley1, Marton Marosszeky2
1School of Management, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
2Australian Center for Construction Innovation, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia

Tóm tắt

The concept of governmentality was developed by Michel Foucault to address the specificity of contemporary neo-liberal forms of governance — premised on the active consent and subjugation of subjects, rather than their oppression, domination or external control. These neo-liberal forms of governance are evident in new forms of alliance contracting in the construction industry. We review the major innovations in organization form in the sector, before considering the specific management practices of surveillance and control that are typically associated with governance in these projects. Project management has been a historically evolving field. This paper reports on an example of governmentality applied to the practice of project management. While governmentality refers to the design of project governance as an activity, the management of projects as a mode of organization, irrespective of the mode of governance, is highly complex and uncertain. These themes have already been widely addressed in organization theory. Here, we draw on recent treatments of them that combine transaction costs and resource dependence perspectives. Moreover, we argue that projects also display an acute sense of temporality, as Schutzian-influenced approaches have explored. In the context of governmentality, complexity, uncertainty and temporality are addressed in a specific and highly innovative project management. The research methods used in the ethnography are spelt out, as well as the methods used in constructing the interpretation of the case. Economies in authoritative surveillance have been sought through building collaborative commitment and transparency into the moral fibre of a project. The governmental tools used to do this are a strong project culture, monetized key performance indicators, and a stake-holder conception of the project to bind different organizational stakeholders together. The case does not record an unqualifiedly successful project: the governmentality that was constructed had limits, as the case spells out. The failure indicates some issues that the stakeholder theory of the firm will need to address. We conclude that governmentality projects premised on stakeholder conceptions are particularly susceptible to discrepancies between ambition and outcome. In such a context, the constant injunction to improve may itself be an integral part of the governmental method. Hence, governmentality is particularly appropriate for understanding quality management issues.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.2307/2393374

10.7208/chicago/9780226028811.001.0001

10.1177/017084068800900205

10.1177/135050849633002

10.1007/978-1-4615-5691-6_16

Clegg, Stewart. R., 1975, Power, rule and domination: A critical and empirical understanding of power in sociological theory and organizational life

Clegg, Stewart R., Frameworks of power

Clegg, Stewart R., 1992, Construction conflict management and resolution

Clegg, Stewart R., 1994, Resistance and power in organizations: Agency, subjectivity and the labor process

Clegg, Stewart R., 1995, Organization, 1, 149, 10.1177/135050849400100115

10.4135/9781446219935.n4

10.1177/135050849961006

10.2307/2393854

Dandeker, Chris, 1990, Surveillance, power and modernity: Bureaucracy and discipline from 1700 to the present day

10.1177/135050840071009

10.4135/9781446217580

10.5465/amr.1998.1255632

10.5465/amr.1989.4308385

Flyvbjerg, Bent, 1998, Rationality and power: Democracy in practice

Foucault, Michel, 1977, Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison

Foucault, Michel, 1979, Ideology and Consciousness, 6, 5

Foucault, Michel, 1988, The final Foucault

Foucault, Michel, 1994, Critique and power: Recasting the Foucault/Habermas debate

Gagliardi, Pasquale, 1988, Symbols and artifacts: Views of the corporate landscape

Gagliardi, Pasquale, 1996, Handbook of organization studies

10.2307/1951818

Hardy, Cynthia J., 1996, The handbook of organization studies, 622

10.1007/978-1-4615-5691-6_8

10.4135/9781446219935.n3

Higgin, Gurth, 1966, Interdependence and uncertainty: A study of the building industry

Hobbes, Thomas, 1651, Leviathan

Hunter, Ian, 1993, Economy and Society, 22, 123, 10.1080/03085149300000007

10.4135/9781446221686.n4

10.2307/2393852

Knights, David, 1993, Resistance and power in organizations, 167

10.1007/978-1-4615-5691-6_2

Marcuse, Herbert, 1971, Max Weber and sociology today, 133

10.1177/02632760022051437

McHugh, Peter, 1971, Understanding everyday life: Towards the reconstruction of sociological knowledge, 337

Miller, Peter, 1994, Rethinking objectivity

Morin, Edgar, 1984, Ciencia con Consciencia, 273

10.2307/2393853

Peters, Tom J., 1982, In search of excellence

10.1177/0170840699205005

10.2307/591464

Schutz, Alfred, 1967, The phenomenology of the social world

10.2307/2393857

10.1177/0038038592026002009

Starkey, Ken, 1998, Foucault, management and organization theory

Stinchcombe, Arthur L., 1985, Organization theory and project management: Administering uncertainty in Norwegian offshore oil

Strauss, Ansehm, 1990, Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques

Szakolczai, Arpad, 1998, Max Weber and Michel Foucault: Parallel life-works

10.4135/9781446221686.n11

van Krieken, Robert, 1996, Economy and Society, 25, 195, 10.1080/03085149600000010

Weick, Karl E., 1969, The social psychology of organizing

Weick, Karl E., 1995, Organizational sensemaking. Thousand

Williamson, Oliver E., 1975, Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications: A study in the economics of internal organization

Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1972, Philosophical investigations

Wolin, Sheldon S., 1960, Politics and vision

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Organization Studies

Tập 23 Số 3

317-337

Thông tin tác giả