Governing for the Common Good
Tóm tắt
The proper object of global health governance (GHG) should be the common good, ensuring that all people have the opportunity to flourish. A well-organized global society that promotes the common good is to everyone’s advantage. Enabling people to flourish includes enabling their ability to be healthy. Thus, we must assess health governance by its effectiveness in enhancing health capabilities. Current GHG fails to support human flourishing, diminishes health capabilities and thus does not serve the common good. The provincial globalism theory of health governance proposes a Global Health Constitution and an accompanying Global Institute of Health and Medicine that together propose to transform health governance. Multiple lines of empirical research suggest that these institutions would be effective, offering the most promising path to a healthier, more just world.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Amos, E. A., & Weathington, B. L. (2008). An analysis of the relation between employee-organization value congruence and employee attitudes. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 142(6), 615–631.
Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2014). Evolution of responses to (un)fairness. Science, 346(6207), 314–321.
Coggon, J. (2014). Global health, law, and ethics: Fragmented sovereignty and the limits of universal theory. In M. Freeman, S. Hawkes, & B. Bennett (Eds.), Law and global health: Current legal issues (pp. 369–385). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 39–80.
Dugatkin, L. A. (1997). Cooperation among animals: An evolutionary perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817–867.
Fidler, D. P. (2004). Constitutional outlines of public health’s “new world order”. Temple Law Review, 77, 247–289.
Gostin, L. O. (2014). Global health law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Henrich, J., et al. (Eds.). (2004). Foundations of human sociality: Economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small scale societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kappeler, P. M., & van Schaik, C. P. (2006). Cooperation in primates and humans: Mechanisms and evolution. Berlin: Springer.
Kramer, R. M., & Tyler, T. R. (1996). Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. California: Sage Publications Inc.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rousseau, J. (1968). The social contract (trans: Cranston, M.). London: Penguin Books.
Ruger, J. P. (2006). Ethics and governance of global health inequalities. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 998–1002.
Ruger, J. P. (2006). Millennium development goals for health: Building Human capabilities. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 82(12), 951–952.
Ruger, J. P. (2009). Global health justice. Public Health Ethics, 2(3), 261–275.
Ruger, J. P. (2012). Global Health governance as shared health governance. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 66(7), 653–661.
Ruger, J. P. (2013). A global health constitution for global health governance. American Society of International Law Proceedings, 107, 267–270.
Semmann, D., et al. (2004). Strategic investment in reputation. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 56, 248–252.
Sen, A. (1993). Positional objectivity. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22(2), 126–145.
Skogan, W., & Frydl, K. (Eds.). (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence (p. 297). Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
Tomasello, M., et al. (2012). Two Key steps in the evolution of human cooperation: The interdependence hypothesis. Current Anthropology, 53(6), 673–692.
Tyler, T. R. (2010). Why people cooperate: The role of social motivations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Yamagishi, T., et al. (2009). The private rejection of unfair offers and emotional commitment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(28), 11520–11523.