Globalization, Eastern Germany and the “Mittelstand”

Emerald - Tập 99 Số 1 - Trang 32-41 - 1999
Martin F.Parnell1
1Senior Lecturer in International Business, Liverpool Business School, Liverpool, UK

Tóm tắt

The pressures of globalization in general and the specific fact of declining inward investment represent together a formidable challenge not only to the German political economy itself, but also possibly to the relevance and viability of the “Rhineland” model of capitalism. In particular, growth and changes in financial markets and the role of banks transform these various challenges into potential threats. They exacerbate the problems and difficulties Germany is experiencing in modernising not just industrial structures, procedures and practices, but also indeed its distinctive industrial culture. Two exemplars of the current crisis are examined here in detail: eastern Germany, and the Mittelstand (Germany’s SMEs). The present balance of evidence appears to indicate that successful adaptation is not occurring, with clear indications that it is primarily socio‐cultural factors which are hindering the transformation process.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (1995, “Holding down the global”, in Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (Eds), Globalization, Institutions, and Regional Development in Europe, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 257‐60.

Business Week (1997a), 25 August.

Business Week (1997b), 8 September.

Cooke, P and Morgan, K. (1995, “Growth regions under duress: renewal strategies in Baden‐Württemberg and Emilia‐Romagna”, in Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (Eds), Globalization, Institutions and Regional Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 91‐117.

Dicken, P., Forsgren, M. and Malmberg, A. (1995, “The local embeddedness of transnational corporations”, in Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (Eds), Globalization, Institutions and Regional Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 23‐45.

Die Welt (1997a), 14 May.

Die Welt (1997b), 2 September.

Die Woche (1996), No. 26, 21 June.

Die Zeit (1994), 14 May.

Die Zeit (1996), No. 22, 23 May.

(The) EuropeanT (1996), 11‐17 January.

(The) EuropeanT (1997a), 29 May‐4 July.

(The) EuropeanT (1997b), 24‐30 July.

(The) EuropeanT (1997c), 31 July‐6 August.

Financial Times(1997), 24 September.

Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung/FAZ (1997a), 16 May.

Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung/FAZ (1997b), 22 May.

Grabher, G. (1995, “The disembedded regional economy: the transformation of East German industrial complexes into Western enclaves”, in Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (Eds), Globalization, Institutions and Regional Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 177‐95.

Guardian(1997a), 21 July.

Guardian(1997b), 7 July.

Guardian(1997c), 17 September.

Handelsblatt (1997, 21 May.

Ohmae, K. (1995, The End of the Nation State, Free Press, New York, NY.

Parnell, M.F. (1993, “Exporting by German SMEs: small company perspectives”, European Business and Economic Development, Vol. 1 No. 4, January, pp. 27‐30.

Parnell, M.F. (1998, “Globalization, ‘organized capitalism’ and German labour I”, European Business Review, Vol. 10 No. 2, Note 6, pp. 80‐87.

Parnell, M.F. (n.d.), “Globalization, ‘organized capitalism’ and German labour II”.

Peters, T. (1992, Liberation Management, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, NY.

Porter, M.E. (1990, The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Free Press, New York, NY.

Radice, H. (1997, “‘Globalization’ and national differences”, in Proceedings of 24th AIB Conference, Leeds, 4/5 April, Vol. 2, pp. 515‐37.

Smyser, W.R. (1992, The Economy of United Germany, St Martin’s Press, New York, NY, p. 97.

Thurrow, L. (1997, Welt am Sonntag, 18 May.

Tüselmann, H.J. (1995, “‘Standort Deutschland’ ‐ is Germany losing its appeal as an international manufacturing location?”, European Business Review, Vol. 95 No. 5, pp. 21‐30.

Welt am Sonntag(1997), 18 May.

Wildeman (1997, “Das Ideenpotential muß organisiert werden”, in Wirtschaftskurier, April.

Wirtschaftskurier (1997), “Leader‐Position angepeilt”, April..