Global and regional shock transmission: an Asian perspective
Tóm tắt
This paper constructs and uses the global input–output (GIO) table with 35 industries, 29 endogenous countries and 59 exogenous countries, and develops new indices to measure the degree of shock transmission in terms of intermediate goods and value-added embodied in production induced by negative global demand shock to finished goods. After the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) in 2008, China did not experience a large decline in economic growth, even though China’s gross exports fell most severely among Asian countries. In contrast, a sharp decrease in Japanese GDP in 2009 is a consequence of a substantial decline in finished goods exports, especially in the transport equipment industry. In Japan, the shock effect tends to be absorbed in its domestic sector and is not transmitted to other foreign countries. An asymmetric pattern of shock transmission between Japan and other Asian countries can explain why Japan was more affected by GFC than other Asian countries.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ando M, Kimura F (2012) How did the Japanese Exports Respond to Two Crises in the International Production Networks? The Global Financial Crisis and the Great East Japan Earthquake. As Econ J 26(3):261–287
Athukorala P-C (2009) The rise of china and east asian export performance: is the crowding-out fear warranted? The World Econ 32(2):234–266
Crowley, Meredith A. and Xi Luo, 2011, “Understanding the Great Trade Collapse of 2008–09 and the Subsequent Trade Recovery,” Economic Perspectives, 2nd Quarter, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, pp.44–70.
Daudin G, Rifflart C, Schweisguth D (2011) Who produces for whom in the world economy? Can J Econ 44(4):1409–1538
Ferrarini B (2013) Vertical trade maps. Asian Econ J 27(2):105–123
Foster N, Stehrer R (2013) Value added content of trade: a comprehensive approach. Econ Lett 120:354–357
Hummels D, Ishii J, Yi K-M (2001) The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade. J Int Econ 54(1):75–96
Johnson RC, Noguera G (2012) Accounting for intermediates: production sharing and trade in value added. J Int Econ 86:224–236
Kimura F, Obashi A (2011) Production networks in East Asia: what we know so far. ADBI Working Paper Series, No. 320, November
Koopman R, Wang Z, Wei SJ (2008) How much Chinese exports is really made in China – Assessing foreign and domestic value-added in gross exports. NBER Working Paper No.14109
Koopman R, Wang Z, Wei S-J (2012) Estimating domestic content in exports when processing trade is pervasive. J Dev Econ 99(1):178–189
Koopman R, Wang Z, Wei S-J (2014) Tracing value-added and double counting in gross exports. Am Econ Rev 104(2):459–494
Miller RE, Blair PD (2009) Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Nagengast AJ, Stehrer R (2014) Collateral imbalances in intra-European trade? Accounting for the differences between gross and value added trade balances. European Central Bank Working Paper No. 1695
Ng ECY (2010) Production fragmentation and business-cycle comovement. J Int Econ 82(1):1–14
Shimizu J, Sato K (2015) Abenomics, yen depreciation, trade deficit and export competitiveness. RIETI Discussion Paper Series 15-E-020
Stehrer R, Foster N, de Vries G (2012) “Value Added and Factors in Trade: A Comprehensive Approach,” wiiw (the Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies) Working Paper No. 80
Timmer MP, Erumban AA, Los B, Stehrer R, de Vries GJ (2014) Slicing up global value chains. J Econ Perspect 28(2):99–118
Wang Z, Wei SJ, Zhu K (2013) “Quantifying International Production Sharing at the Bilateral and Sector Level,” NBER Working Paper No.19677