Global amphibian declines: sorting the hypotheses

Diversity and Distributions - Tập 9 Số 2 - Trang 89-98 - 2003
James P. Collins1, Andrew Storfer1
1*1Department of Biology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287–1501, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] and 2School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164–4236, U.S.A.

Tóm tắt

Abstract. Reports of malformed amphibians and global amphibian declines have led to public concern, particularly because amphibians are thought to be indicator species of overall environmental health. The topic also draws scientific attention because there is no obvious, simple answer to the question of what is causing amphibian declines? Complex interactions of several anthropogenic factors are probably at work, and understanding amphibian declines may thus serve as a model for understanding species declines in general. While we have fewer answers than we would like, there are six leading hypotheses that we sort into two classes. For class I hypotheses, alien species, over‐exploitation and land use change, we have a good understanding of the ecological mechanisms underlying declines; these causes have affected amphibian populations negatively for more than a century. However, the question remains as to whether the magnitude of these negative effects increased in the 1980s, as scientists began to notice a global decline of amphibians. Further, remedies for these problems are not simple. For class II hypotheses, global change (including UV radiation and global climate change), contaminants and emerging infectious diseases we have a poor, but improving understanding of how each might cause declines. Class II factors involve complex and subtle mechanistic underpinnings, with probable interactions among multiple ecological and evolutionary variables. They may also interact with class I hypotheses. Suspected mechanisms associated with class II hypotheses are relatively recent, dating from at least the middle of the 20th century. Did these causes act independently or in concert with pre‐existing negative forces of class I hypotheses to increase the rate of amphibian declines to a level that drew global attention? We need more studies that connect the suspected mechanisms underlying both classes of hypotheses with quantitative changes in amphibian population sizes and species numbers. An important step forward in this task is clarifying the hypotheses and conditions under which the various causes operate alone or together.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alford R.A., 2001, Global amphibian population declines, Nature, 414, 449

10.1126/science.1070656

10.1126/science.247.4946.1033

10.1073/pnas.95.15.9031

10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00352.x

10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00015.x

10.7589/0090-3558-35.3.413

10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00011.x

Carey C., 2003, Multiple stressors and declining amphibian populations: evaluating cause and effect, 1

Collins J.P., 2003, Amphibian conservation, 1

Collins J.P., 2003, Status and conservation of U.S. amphibians, 43

Collins J.P., 1988, Management of amphibians, reptiles and small mammals in North America, 45

10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2958:VBPATE]2.0.CO;2

10.3201/eid0506.990601

10.1126/science.287.5452.443

10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00016.x

10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0464:DOTCRL]2.0.CO;2

Ebert D., 1999, Evolution in health and disease, 161

10.1093/icb/13.1.91

Flannery T., 2001, The eternal frontier

10.2307/1566028

Hairston N.G., 1993, No decline in Salamander (Amphibia: Caudata) populations: A twenty‐year study in the Southern Appalachians, Brimleyana, 18, 59

10.1126/science.285.5433.1505

Hecnar S.J.(1997)Amphibian pond communities in southwestern Ontario.Amphibians in decline: Canadian studies of a global problem(ed. byD.M.Green).Herpetological Conservation1 1–15.

10.2307/2265703

10.1046/j.1365-2699.1998.2540763.x

10.1038/35008052

10.3354/dao031161

10.3354/dao046159

Jennings M.R.&Hayes M.P.(1985)Pre‐1900 overharvest of Californian red‐legged frogs (Rana aurora draytonii). The inducement for bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) introduction.Herpetologica41 94–103.

10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00013.x

10.1038/35070552

10.1007/s10021-001-0009-0

10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00446.x

10.2307/2426257

10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020406.x

Levins R., 1994, The emergence of new diseases, American Scientist, 82, 52

10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.96359.x

10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97185.x

Lips K.R. Reeve J.&Witters L.(2003) Ecological factors predicting amphibian population declines in Central America.Conservation Biology in press.

10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.000351

Morehouse E. James T.Y. Ganley A.R.D. Vilgalys R. Berger L. Murphy P.J.&Longcore J.E.(2003)Multilocus sequence typing suggests the chytrid pathogen of amphibians in a recently emerged clone.Molecular Ecology12 in press.

10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2951:OCONWP]2.0.CO;2

10.1126/science.253.5022.892

10.1007/BF00320806

10.1007/s10021-001-0014-3

10.1038/35070683

10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.95485.x

Richards S.J., 1993, Declines in populations of Australia's endemic tropical rainforest frogs, Conservation Biology, 7, 66

10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.98166.x

10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2326:LTDDOA]2.0.CO;2

10.1515/9780691234618

10.1126/science.1071281

Storfer A., 2000, Amphibian declines: unraveling the mystery, Amphibian and Reptile Conservation, 2, 33

10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00014.x

10.2307/1941591

10.1126/science.253.5022.860

10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01428-1

10.1038/416389a

Wilson E.O., 2002, The future of life.

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2001.00218.x

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Diversity and Distributions

Tập 9 Số 2

89-98

Thông tin tác giả