Global Energy Development and Climate-Induced Water Scarcity—Physical Limits, Sectoral Constraints, and Policy Imperatives

Energies - Tập 8 Số 8 - Trang 8211-8225
Christopher A. Scott1,2, Zachary Sugg1
1School of Geography & Development, University of Arizona, ENR2 Building, 1064 E. Lowell St., P.O. Box 210137, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
2Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, 803 E. 1st St., Tucson, AZ 85719, USA

Tóm tắt

The current accelerated growth in demand for energy globally is confronted by water-resource limitations and hydrologic variability linked to climate change. The global spatial and temporal trends in water requirements for energy development and policy alternatives to address these constraints are poorly understood. This article analyzes national-level energy demand trends from U.S. Energy Information Administration data in relation to newly available assessments of water consumption and life-cycle impacts of thermoelectric generation and biofuel production, and freshwater availability and sectoral allocations from the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization and the World Bank. Emerging, energy-related water scarcity flashpoints include the world’s largest, most diversified economies (Brazil, India, China, and USA among others), while physical water scarcity continues to pose limits to energy development in the Middle East and small-island states. Findings include the following: (a) technological obstacles to alleviate water scarcity driven by energy demand are surmountable; (b) resource conservation is inevitable, driven by financial limitations and efficiency gains; and (c) institutional arrangements play a pivotal role in the virtuous water-energy-climate cycle. We conclude by making reference to coupled energy-water policy alternatives including water-conserving energy portfolios, intersectoral water transfers, virtual water for energy, hydropower tradeoffs, and use of impaired waters for energy development.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Chu, 2012, Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future, Nature, 488, 294, 10.1038/nature11475

Ackerman, 2013, Is there a water–energy nexus in electricity generation? Long-term scenarios for the western United States, Energy Policy, 59, 235, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.027

Frei, 2009, Water: A key resource in energy production, Energy Policy, 37, 4303, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.074

Shah, 2009, Climate change and groundwater: India’s opportunities for mitigation and adaptation, Environ. Res. Lett., 4, 035005, 10.1088/1748-9326/4/3/035005

Hightower, 2008, The energy challenge, Nature, 452, 285, 10.1038/452285a

King, 2008, Thirst for energy, Nat. Geosci., 1, 283, 10.1038/ngeo195

Yearsley, 2012, Vulnerability of US and European electricity supply to climate change, Nat. Clim. Chang., 2, 676, 10.1038/nclimate1546

Spang, 2014, The water consumption of energy production: an international comparison, Environ. Res. Lett., 9, 105002, 10.1088/1748-9326/9/10/105002

Siddiqi, 2011, The water energy nexus in Middle East and North Africa, Energy Policy, 39, 4529, 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.023

Chandel, 2011, The potential impacts of climate-change policy on freshwater use in thermoelectric power generation, Energy Policy, 39, 6234, 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.022

Scott, 2011, The water-energy-climate nexus: Resources and policy outlook for aquifers in Mexico, Water Resour. Res., 47, W00L04, 10.1029/2011WR010805

Pachauri, R.K., Allen, M.R., Barros, V.R., Broome, J., Cramer, W., Christ, R., Church, J.A., Clarke, L., Dahe, Q., and Dasgupta, P. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC.

Scott, 2011, Policy and institutional dimensions of the water–energy nexus, Energy Policy, 39, 6622, 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.013

Shrestha, 2012, The carbon footprint of water management policy options, Energy Policy, 42, 201, 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.074

Vengosh, 2014, A critical review of the risks to water resources from unconventional shale gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 8334, 10.1021/es405118y

Averyt, K., Fisher, J., Huber-Lee, A., Lewis, A., Macknick, J., Madden, N., Rogers, J., and Tellinghuisen, S. (2011). Freshwater Use by US Power Plants: Electricity’s Thirst for a Precious Resource, Union of Concerned Scientists.

Scanlon, 2013, Drought and the water-energy nexus in Texas, Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 045033, 10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/045033

Sovacool, 2009, Identifying future electricity-water tradeoffs in the United States, Energy Policy, 37, 2763, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.03.012

Teichert, 2011, Future changes of freshwater needs in European power plants, Manage. Environ. Quality, 22, 89, 10.1108/14777831111098507

DOE (2006). Energy demands on water resources: report to Congress on the interdependency of energy and water, Available online:http://energy.sandia.gov/wp/wp-content/gallery/uploads/dlm_uploads/121-RptToCongress-EWwEIAcomments-FINAL.pdf.

Elcock, 2010, water consumption: The role of energy production, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 46, 447, 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00413.x

Vassolo, 2005, Global-scale gridded estimates of thermoelectric power and manufacturing water use, Water Resour. Res., 41, W04010, 10.1029/2004WR003360

Hoekstra, 2012, Biofuel scenarios in a water perspective: the global blue and green water footprint of road transport in 2030, Global Environ. Change, 22, 764, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.04.001

Spang, 2014, Multiple metrics for quantifying the intensity of water consumption of energy production, Environ. Res. Lett., 9, 105003, 10.1088/1748-9326/9/10/105003

International energy statistics. U.S. Energy Information Administration [EIA], Available online:http://www.eia.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/IEDIndex3.cfm.

AQUASTAT database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO]. Available online:http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/main/index.stm.

Indicators. World Bank. Available online:http://data.worldbank.org/indicator.

Macknick, 2012, Operational water consumption and withdrawal factors for electricity generating technologies: a review of existing literature, Environ. Res. Lett., 7, 045802, 10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/045802

Mulder, 2010, Burning water: A comparative analysis of the energy return on water invested, Ambio, 39, 30, 10.1007/s13280-009-0003-x

Bailey, R. (2013). Energy, Environment and Resources EER PP, Chatham House. 2013/01.

Mittal, A. (2010). Energy-water nexus: Many uncertainties remain about national and regional effects of increased biofuel production on water resources, Available online:http://www.gao.gov/assets/300/299103.pdf.

OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook Database Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Available online:http://www.agri-outlook.org/database.html.

Giordano, 2008, Biofuels and implications for agricultural water use: Blue impacts of green energy, Water Policy, 10, 67, 10.2166/wp.2008.054

Kanellakis, 2013, European energy policy—A review, Energy Policy, 62, 1020, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.008

Wurbs, 2014, Reservoir evaporation in Texas, USA, J. Hydrol., 510, 1, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.011

Chiu, 2009, Water embodied in bioethanol in the United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 2688, 10.1021/es8031067

Guilhoto, 2013, Analysis of socio-economic impacts of sustainable sugarcane–ethanol production by means of inter-regional Input–Output analysis: Demonstrated for Northeast Brazil, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 28, 290, 10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.050

Chiu, 2012, Assessing county-level water footprints of different cellulosic-biofuel feedstock pathways, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 9155, 10.1021/es3002162

Mekonnen, M.M., and Hoekstra, A.Y. (2010). UNESCO. Available online:http://waterfootprint.org/media/downloads/Report47-WaterFootprintCrops-Vol1.pdf.

King, 2010, The water needs for LDV transportation in the United States, Energy Policy, 38, 1157, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.004

Kenny, J.F., Barber, N.L., Hutson, S.S., Linsey, K.S., Lovelace, J.K., and Maupin, M.A. (2009). Estimated use of water in the United States in 2005, Available online:http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1344/.

Orcutt, M. Water power. Available online:http://www.technologyreview.com/graphiti/423762/water-power/.

Siddiqi, 2013, Bridging decision networks for integrated water and energy planning, Energy Strateg. Rev., 2, 46, 10.1016/j.esr.2013.02.003

Schoonbaert, B. (2012). The water-energy nexus in the UK: Assessing the impact of UK energy policy on future water use in thermoelectric power generation. [Master’s thesis, Kings College, University of London]. Available online:http://www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/departments/geography/study/masters/dissertations/Dissertation-2012-Schoonbaert.pdf.

Rhodes, 2014, The global surge in energy innovation, Energies, 7, 5601, 10.3390/en7095601

Sorrell, 2014, Energy substitution, technical change and rebound effects, Energies, 7, 2850, 10.3390/en7052850

Koch, 2002, Hydropower—the politics of water and energy: Introduction and overview, Energy Policy, 30, 1207, 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00081-2

Bauer, 1998, Slippery property rights: multiple water uses and the neoliberal model in Chile, 1981–1995, Nat. Resour. J., 38, 109