Geo-Hazard-Based Approach for the Estimation of Seismic Vulnerability and Damage Scenarios of the Old City of Senerchia (Avellino, Italy)

Geosciences (Switzerland) - Tập 9 Số 2 - Trang 59
Nicola Chieffo1, Antonio Formisano2
1Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Politehnica University of Timisoara, Traian Lalescu Street, Timisoara 300223, jud. Timis, Romania
2Department of Structures for Engineering and Architecture, School of Polytechnic and Basic Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", P. le V. Tecchio 80, 80125 Napoli, Italy

Tóm tắt

The large-scale seismic risk assessment is a crucial point for safeguarding people and planning adequate mitigation plans in urban areas. The current research work aims at analysing a sector of the historic centre of Senerchia, located in the province of Avellino, in order to assess the seismic vulnerability and damage of old masonry building compounds. First, the typological classification of the inspected building aggregates is developed using the CARTIS form developed by the PLINIVS research centre in collaboration with the Italian Civil Protection Department. The global seismic vulnerability assessment of the building sample is carried out using the macroseismic method according to the EMS-98 scale in order to identify the buildings most susceptible to seismic damage. Furthermore, 12 damage scenarios are developed by means of an appropriate seismic attenuation law. Finally, the expected damage scenarios considering the local hazard effects induced are developed in order to evaluate the damage increment, averagely equal to 50%, due to the seismic amplification of different soil categories.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Galli, P., and Camassi, R. (2019, January 02). Rapporto Sugli Effetti del Terremoto Aquilano del 6 Aprile 2009, (In Italian).

Galli, P., Castenetto, S., and Peronace, E. (2019, January 03). Rilievo macrosismico MCS Speditivo 1, Rapporto Finale, (In Italian).

National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology (INGV) (2109, January 09). Rapporto Di Sintesi Sul Terremoto in Centro Italia Mw 6.5 del 30 Ottobre 2016. (In Italian).

Barbat, 2010, Seismic vulnerability and risk evaluation methods for urban areas. A review with application to a pilot area, Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 6, 17, 10.1080/15732470802663763

Porter, 2004, Simplified estimation of economic seismic risk for buildings, Earthq. Spectra, 20, 1239, 10.1193/1.1809129

Zuccolo, 2011, Neo-Deterministic and Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessments: A Comparison over the Italian Territory, Pure Appl. Geophys., 168, 69, 10.1007/s00024-010-0151-8

Basaglia, 2018, Performance-based Seismic Risk Assessment of Urban Systems, Int. J. Archit. Herit., 12, 1131, 10.1080/15583058.2018.1503371

Wiggering, 2018, Ecosystem Vulnerability Review: Proposal of an Interdisciplinary Ecosystem Assessment Approach, Environ. Manag., 61, 904, 10.1007/s00267-018-1023-8

Cara, 2018, Seismic Risk Assessment and Mitigation at Emergency Limit Condition of Historical Buildings along Strategic Urban Roadways. Application to the “Antiga Esquerra de L’Eixample” Neighborhood of Barcelona, Int. J. Archit. Herit., 12, 1055, 10.1080/15583058.2018.1503376

Hurtado, 2018, Building survey forms for heterogeneous urban areas in seismically hazardous zones. Application to the historical center of Valparaíso, Chile, Int. J. Archit. Herit., 12, 1076, 10.1080/15583058.2018.1503370

Formisano, A., Florio, G., Landolfo, R., and Mazzolani, F.M. (2011, January 6–9). Numerical calibration of a simplified procedure for the seismic behaviour assessment of masonry building aggregates. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Computing, Crete, Greece.

Formisano, 2017, Seismic vulnerability and damage of Italian historical centre: A case study in the Campania region, AIP Conf. Proc., 1863, 450007, 10.1063/1.4992616

Rapone, 2018, Seismic vulnerability assessment of historic centers: Description of a predictive method and application to the case study of scanno (Abruzzi, Italy), Int. J. Archit. Herit., 12, 1171, 10.1080/15583058.2018.1503373

Clementi, 2016, Assessment of seismic behaviour of heritage masonry buildings using numerical modelling, J. Build. Eng., 8, 29, 10.1016/j.jobe.2016.09.005

Angelillo, 2014, Masonry behaviour and modelling, Mechanics of Masonry Structures, Volume 551, 1, 10.1007/978-3-7091-1774-3_1

Formisano, 2017, Simplified and refined methods for seismic vulnerability assessment and retrofitting of an Italian cultural heritage masonry building, Comput. Struct., 180, 13, 10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.07.005

2018, The 1531 earthquake revisited: Loss estimation in a historical perspective, Bull. Earthq. Eng., 16, 1

Ansal, 2012, Non linear push over assessment of heritage buildings in Istanbul to define seismic risk, Bull. Earthq. Eng., 10, 285, 10.1007/s10518-011-9311-1

Evangelista, 2017, Physics-based seismic input for engineering applications: A case study in the Aterno river valley, Central Italy, Bull. Earthq. Eng., 15, 2645, 10.1007/s10518-017-0089-7

Giovinazzi, 2009, Geotechnical hazard representation for seismic risk analysis, Bull. N. Z. Earthq. Eng., 42, 221

(2018, January 03). Ministerial Decree, DM 20/02/2018. “Updating of Technical Standards for Construction”. (In Italian).

Calvanese, F., Carchedi, F., and D’Amelio, R. (2005). Emigrazione e immigrazione in Campania: Il caso dell’Alto Sele. Materiali, Ediesse.

Scognamiglio, L., Tinti, E., Emolo, U.R.A., and Gallovic, F. (2019, January 08). Progetto S3—Scenari di Scuotimento in aree di Interesse Prioritario e/o Strategico. Available online: http://esse3.mi.ingv.it.

Pantosti, 1993, Paleoseismology along the 1980 surface rupture of the irpinia fault: Implications for earthquake recurrence in the southern Apennines, Italy, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 98, 6561, 10.1029/92JB02277

Ameri, 2011, Ground-Motion simulations for the 1980 M 6.9 Irpinia earthquake (Southern Italy) and scenario events, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 101, 1136, 10.1785/0120100231

Pulinets, 2007, Irpinia earthquake 23 November 1980—Lesson from nature reviled by joint data analysis, Ann. Geophys., 50, 61

Pasquale, 2009, Earthquake focal mechanisms and stress inversion in the Irpinia Region (Southern Italy), J. Seismol., 13, 107, 10.1007/s10950-008-9119-x

Mangalathu, 2016, ANCOVA-based grouping of bridge classes for seismic fragility assessment, Eng. Struct., 123, 379, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.054

Zuccaro, G., Della Bella, M., and Papa, F. (1999, January 20–23). Caratterizzazione tipologico strutturali a scala nazionale. Proceedings of the 9th National Conference ANIDIS, L’ingegneria Sismica, Italy.

Formisano, 2015, Numerical calibration of an easy method for seismic behaviour assessment on large scale of masonry building aggregates, Adv. Eng. Softw., 80, 116, 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.09.013

Formisano, A., Chieffo, N., and Mosoarca, M. (2017). Seismic Vulnerability and Damage Speedy Estimation of an Urban Sector within the Municipality of San Potito Sannitico (Caserta, Italy). Open Civ. Eng. J., 1106–1121.

Benedetti, 1984, Sulla vulnerabilita sismica di edifici in muratura: Proposta su un metodo di valutazione, L’industria Delle Costr., 149, 64

Giovinazzi, S., and Lagomarsino, S. (2004, January 1–6). A Macroseismic Method for the Vulnerability Assessment of Buildings. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Lagomarsino, 2006, On the vulnerability assessment of monumental buildings, Bull. Earthq. Eng., 4, 445, 10.1007/s10518-006-9025-y

Maio, 2016, Seismic vulnerability assessment of historical urban centres: Case study of the old city centre of Faro, Portugal, J. Risk Res., 19, 551, 10.1080/13669877.2014.988285

Elnashai, A.S., and Di Sarno, L. Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering, [1st ed.]. Available online: https://fac.ksu.edu.sa/sites/default/files/fundamentals_of_earthquake_engineering.pdf.

Vilanova, 2007, Probabilistic seismic-hazard assessment for Portugal, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 97, 1702, 10.1785/0120050198

Toro, 1997, Model of Strong Ground Motions from Earthquakes in Central and Eastern North America: Best Estimates and Uncertainties, Seismol. Res. Lett., 68, 41, 10.1785/gssrl.68.1.41

Atkinson, G.M., and Boore, D.M. (1997). Stochastic point-source modeling of ground motions in the Cascadia region. Seismol. Res. Lett., 74–85.

Atkinson, 2007, Relationships between felt intensity and instrumental ground motion in the Central United States and California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 97, 497, 10.1785/0120060154

Ambraseys, 1996, Prediction of Horizontal Response Spectra in Europe, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn, 25, 371, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199604)25:4<371::AID-EQE550>3.0.CO;2-A

Crespellani, T., and Garzonio, C.A. (1997, January 3–4). Seismic risk assessment for the preservation of historical buildings in the city of Gubbio. In Geotechnical engineering for the preservation of monuments and historic sites. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Geotechnical Engineering for the Preservation of Monuments and Historic Sites, Napoli, Italy.

Locati, M. (2019, January 02). DBMI15, the 2015 Version of the Italian Macroseismic Database, 2016 (In Italian). Available online: https://emidius.mi.ingv.it.

Grünthal, G. (2019, January 07). European Macroseismic Scale 1998. Available online: http://lib.riskreductionafrica.org/bitstream/handle/123456789/1193/1281.European%20Macroseismic%20Scale%201998.pdf?sequence=1.

Formisano, 2017, Local- and global-scale seismic analyses of historical masonry compounds in San Pio delle Camere (L’Aquila, Italy), Nat. Hazards, 86, 465, 10.1007/s11069-016-2694-1

(2019, January 11). S.T.A data srl, “3Muri 10.9.0—User Manual”. (In Italian).

Maio, R., Vicente, R., Formisano, A., and Varum, H. (2014, January 24–29). Seismic vulnerability assessment of an old stone masonry building aggregate in San Pio delle Camere, Italy. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Istanbul, Turkey.

Formisano, 2017, Theoretical and Numerical Seismic Analysis of Masonry Building Aggregates: Case Studies in San Pio Delle Camere (L’Aquila, Italy), J. Earthq. Eng., 21, 227, 10.1080/13632469.2016.1172376