Genexpressions- und Proteomanalyse – Reif für die klinische Anwendung?

Polanski LT, Baumgarten MN, Quenby S et al (2014) What exactly do we mean by “recurrent implantation failure”? A systematic review and opinion. Reprod Biomed Online 28:409–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.12.006 Voullaire L, Wilton L, McBain J et al (2002) Chromosome abnormalities identified by comparative genomic hybridization in embryos from women with repeated implantation failure. Mol Hum Reprod 8:1035–1041 Revel A (2012) Defective endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril 97:1028–1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.039 Simon A, Laufer N (2012) Repeated implantation failure: clinical approach. Fertil Steril 97:1039–1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.010 van der Gaast MH, Beier-Hellwig K, Fauser BCJM et al (2003) Endometrial secretion aspiration prior to embryo transfer does not reduce implantation rates. Reprod Biomed Online 7:105–109 Noyes RW, Hertig AT, Rock J (1950) Dating the endometrial biopsy. Fertil Steril 1:3–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)30062-0 Hess AP, Talbi S, Hamilton AE et al (2013) The human oviduct transcriptome reveals an anti-inflammatory, anti-angiogenic, secretory and matrix-stable environment during embryo transit. Reprod Biomed Online 27:423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.06.013 Coutifaris C, Myers ER, Guzick DS et al (2004) Histological dating of timed endometrial biopsy tissue is not related to fertility status. Fertil Steril 82:1264–1272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.03.069 Aghajanova L, Hamilton A, Giudice L (2008) Uterine Receptivity to Human Embryonic Implantation: Histology, Biomarkers, and Transcriptomics. Semin Cell Dev Biol 19:204–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2007.10.008 Schena M, Shalon D, Davis RW, Brown PO (1995) Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science 270:467–470 Barrett JC, Kawasaki ES (2003) Microarrays: the use of oligonucleotides and cDNA for the analysis of gene expression. Drug Discov Today 8:134–141 Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, Simón C (2012) The genomics of the human endometrium. Biochim Biophys Acta 1822:1931–1942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.05.004 Kao LC, Tulac S, Lobo S et al (2002) Global gene profiling in human endometrium during the window of implantation. Endocrinology 143:2119–2138. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.143.6.8885 Ponnampalam AP, Weston GC, Trajstman AC et al (2004) Molecular classification of human endometrial cycle stages by transcriptional profiling. MHR Basic Sci Reprod Med 10:879–893. https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gah121 Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, Díaz-Gimeno P et al (2013) The endometrial receptivity array for diagnosis and personalized embryo transfer as a treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertil Steril 100:818–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.05.004 Díaz-Gimeno P, Horcajadas JA, Martínez-Conejero JA et al (2011) A genomic diagnostic tool for human endometrial receptivity based on the transcriptomic signature. Fertil Steril 95:50–60, 60.e1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.063 Katzorke N, Vilella F, Ruiz M et al (2016) Diagnosis of endometrial-factor infertility: current approaches and new avenues for research. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 76:699–703. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-103752 Díaz-Gimeno P, Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D et al (2013) The accuracy and reproducibility of the endometrial receptivity array is superior to histology as a diagnostic method for endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril 99:508–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.046 Tan J, Kan A, Hitkari J et al (2018) The role of the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) in patients who have failed euploid embryo transfers. J Assist Reprod Genet. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-1112-2 Enciso M, Carrascosa JP, Sarasa J et al (2018) Development of a new comprehensive and reliable endometrial receptivity map (ER Map/ER Grade) based on RT-qPCR gene expression analysis. Hum Reprod 33:220–228. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex370 Sebastian-Leon P, Garrido N, Remohí J et al (2018) Asynchronous and pathological windows of implantation: two causes of recurrent implantation failure. Hum Reprod 33:626–635. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey023 Koot YEM, van Hooff SR, Boomsma CM et al (2016) An endometrial gene expression signature accurately predicts recurrent implantation failure after IVF. Sci Rep 6:19411. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19411 Ambros V (2001) microRNAs: tiny regulators with great potential. Cell 107:823–826 Altmäe S, Martinez-Conejero JA, Esteban FJ et al (2013) MicroRNAs miR-30b, miR-30d, and miR-494 regulate human endometrial receptivityReprod Sci Thousand Oaks Calif. Reprod Sci 20:308–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719112453507 Revel A, Achache H, Stevens J et al (2011) MicroRNAs are associated with human embryo implantation defects. Hum Reprod 26:2830–2840. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der255 Sha A‑G, Liu J‑L, Jiang X‑M et al (2011) Genome-wide identification of micro-ribonucleic acids associated with human endometrial receptivity in natural and stimulated cycles by deep sequencing. Fertil Steril 96:150–155.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.072 Vilella F, Moreno-Moya JM, Balaguer N et al (2015) Hsa-miR-30d, secreted by the human endometrium, is taken up by the pre-implantation embryo and might modify its transcriptome. Development 142:3210–3221. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.124289 Meyer HE, Stühler K (2007) High-performance proteomics as a tool in biomarker discovery. Proteomics 7(Suppl 1):18–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200700183 Kosteria I, Anagnostopoulos AK, Kanaka-Gantenbein C et al (2017) The use of proteomics in assisted reproduction. In Vivo 31:267–283. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11056 Chen JI-C, Hannan NJ, Mak Y et al (2009) Proteomic characterization of midproliferative and midsecretory human endometrium. J Proteome Res 8:2032–2044. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr801024g Domínguez F, Garrido-Gómez T, López JA et al (2009) Proteomic analysis of the human receptive versus non-receptive endometrium using differential in-gel electrophoresis and MALDI-MS unveils stathmin 1 and annexin A2 as differentially regulated. Hum Reprod 24:2607–2617. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep230 Garrido-Gómez T, Quiñonero A, Antúnez O et al (2014) Deciphering the proteomic signature of human endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod 29:1957–1967. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu171 Hannan NJ, Stephens AN, Rainczuk A et al (2010) 2D-DiGE analysis of the human endometrial secretome reveals differences between receptive and nonreceptive states in fertile and infertile women. J Proteome Res 9:6256–6264. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr1004828