Fungal community analysis by high‐throughput sequencing of amplified markers – a user's guide

New Phytologist - Tập 199 Số 1 - Trang 288-299 - 2013
Björn D. Lindahl1, R. Henrik Nilsson2, Leho Tedersoo3, Kessy Abarenkov3, Tor Carlsen4, Rasmus Kjøller5, Urmas Kõljalg3, Taina Pennanen6, Søren Rosendahl5, Jan Stenlid1, Håvard Kauserud4
1Department of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7026, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
2Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, SE-405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
3Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences/Natural History Museum University of Tartu 46 Vanemuise St. 51014 Tartu Estonia
4Department of Biology, University of Oslo, PO Box 1066, Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
5Department of Biology University of Copenhagen Øster Farimagsgade 2D 1353 Copenhagen Denmark
6The Finnish Forest Research Institute, PL 18, FI-01301 Vantaa, Finland

Tóm tắt

Summary Novel high‐throughput sequencing methods outperform earlier approaches in terms of resolution and magnitude. They enable identification and relative quantification of community members and offer new insights into fungal community ecology. These methods are currently taking over as the primary tool to assess fungal communities of plant‐associated endophytes, pathogens, and mycorrhizal symbionts, as well as free‐living saprotrophs. Taking advantage of the collective experience of six research groups, we here review the different stages involved in fungal community analysis, from field sampling via laboratory procedures to bioinformatics and data interpretation. We discuss potential pitfalls, alternatives, and solutions. Highlighted topics are challenges involved in: obtaining representative DNA/RNA samples and replicates that encompass the targeted variation in community composition, selection of marker regions and primers, options for amplification and multiplexing, handling of sequencing errors, and taxonomic identification. Without awareness of methodological biases, limitations of markers, and bioinformatics challenges, large‐scale sequencing projects risk yielding artificial results and misleading conclusions.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03160.x

10.4137/EBO.S6271

10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04898.x

10.1038/ismej.2011.95

10.1016/j.funeco.2012.10.002

10.1093/bioinformatics/btr251

10.1016/j.funeco.2012.09.003

10.1007/s00253-010-2585-4

10.1186/1471-2180-10-189

10.1007/s10482-011-9598-6

10.1128/AEM.05220-11

10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.010

10.1111/j.1574-6941.2000.tb00683.x

10.1038/ismej.2009.77

10.1038/nmeth.1990

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03003.x

10.1038/nmeth.f.303

10.1016/j.funeco.2012.06.003

10.1264/jsme2.ME08525

10.1016/j.ympev.2008.10.008

10.1128/AEM.01592-08

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04215.x

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03473.x

10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00535.x

10.1016/j.funbio.2011.03.005

10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195

10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461

10.1038/ismej.2009.153

10.1371/journal.pone.0042543

10.1093/nar/gks002

10.1073/pnas.0907303106

10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x

10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05110.x

10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02550.x

10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03024.x

10.1093/nar/gkq545

10.1007/s00572-003-0244-7

10.1128/AEM.72.1.135-143.2006

10.1101/gr.112730.110

10.1038/ismej.2009.97

10.1093/bioinformatics/btq725

10.1016/j.mimet.2010.08.008

10.1038/ismej.2012.84

10.1128/JCM.02073-08

10.1038/35035065

10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01857.x

10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02193.x

10.1101/gr.120618.111

10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01437.x

10.1038/nature05110

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02990.x

10.1016/S1389-1723(03)90130-7

10.1094/PHYTO-100-8-0732

10.1093/bioinformatics/bts578

10.1007/s00572-011-0403-1

10.1139/g06-046

10.1371/journal.pone.0010971

10.1111/mec.12259

10.1093/nar/gkp966

10.1016/j.molcel.2010.02.024

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02835.x

10.1186/1471-2105-12-182

10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02051.x

Kuske CR, 2013, Ecological genomics of the fungi

10.2144/000113219

10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00531.x

10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01894.x

10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02445.x

10.2144/000113387

10.1038/nmeth850

10.1016/j.femsec.2004.04.004

10.1038/ismej.2010.19

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01936.x

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01147.x

10.3852/10-331

10.1128/AEM.06826-11

10.1038/nature03959

10.1128/AEM.67.5.2354-2359.2001

10.3852/11-027

10.4137/EBO.S653

10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01618.x

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03755.x

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02920.x

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03334.x

10.1093/nar/gkm760

10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.01.014

10.1016/j.chemolab.2004.09.013

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03204.x

10.1128/AEM.64.10.3724-3730.1998

10.1371/journal.pone.0035749

10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02201.x

10.1093/nar/gkm864

10.1038/nmeth.1361

10.1186/1471-2105-12-38

10.1016/j.funeco.2011.05.005

10.1038/nmeth0910-668b

10.1186/1471-2105-13-283

10.1186/1471-2105-11-601

10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134239

10.1128/AEM.01541-09

10.1073/pnas.1117018109

10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05538.x

10.1038/356428a0

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03262.x

10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05317.x

10.1128/AEM.64.8.3110-3113.1998

10.1371/journal.pone.0024940

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02561.x

10.1007/s00572-009-0274-x

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03373.x

10.1371/journal.pone.0040863

10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00410.x

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03324.x

10.1128/AEM.00062-07

White TJ, 1990, PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications, 315

10.1128/aem.63.10.3741-3751.1997