Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Compensatory Neural Recruitment in Aging and Risk for Alzheimer’s Disease: Review and Recommendations

Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders - Tập 27 Số 1 - Trang 1-10 - 2009
S. Duke Han1, Katherine J. Bangen2, Mark W. Bondi3
1Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Ill., USA.
2SDSU/UCSD Joint Doctoral Program,
3Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, and

Tóm tắt

There has been a recent proliferation of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies that interpret between-group or within-group differences in brain response patterns as evidence for compensatory neural recruitment. However, it is currently a challenge to determine whether these observed differences are truly attributable to compensatory neural recruitment or whether they are indicative of some other cognitive or physiological process. Therefore, the need for a standardized set of criteria for interpreting whether differences in brain response patterns are compensatory in nature is great. Focusing on studies of aging and potentially prodromal Alzheimer’s disease conditions (genetic risk, mild cognitive impairment), we critically review the functional neuroimaging literature purporting evidence for compensatory neural recruitment. Finally, we end with a comprehensive model set of criteria for ascertaining the degree to which a ‘compensatory’ interpretation may be supported. This proposed model addresses significant brain region, activation pattern, and behavioral performance considerations, and is therefore termed the Region-Activation-Performance model (RAP model).

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016%2Fj.neurobiolaging.2005.12.013

10.1037%2F0882-7974.3.1.3

10.1037%2F0882-7974.17.1.85

10.1162%2F089892900561814

10.1006%2Fnimg.2002.1280

10.1016%2FS0278-5846%2801%2900300-1

10.1093%2Fcercor%2Fbhm155

10.1016%2Fj.neurobiolaging.2006.11.011

10.1016%2FS1364-6613%2800%2901769-1

10.1016%2FS0926-6410%2800%2900058-6

10.1016%2Fj.neurobiolaging.2005.12.012

10.1037%2F0882-7974.20.3.363

10.1111%2F1467-9450.00237

10.1006%2Fnimg.1999.0444

10.1016%2FS0149-7634%2802%2900066-0

10.1056%2FNEJM200008173430701

10.1002%2Fhbm.460010407

10.1212%2F01.WNL.0000150885.00929.7E

10.1176%2Fappi.ajgp.10.1.44

10.1002%2Fana.20163

10.1136%2Fjnnp.2006.104877

10.1016%2Fj.neurobiolaging.2006.08.008

10.1016%2Fj.neuroimage.2004.07.013

10.1097%2F00004647-200110000-00001

10.1161%2F01.STR.0000143324.31408.db

10.1073%2Fpnas.95.4.1834

10.1038%2Fnrn1246

10.1016%2FS0022-510X%2800%2900396-8

10.1016%2FS0197-4580%2898%2900004-9

10.1080%2F03610739308253935

10.1093%2Fbrain%2F124.3.457

10.1162%2F089892900564046

10.1016%2Fj.acra.2004.08.015

10.1186%2F1471-2202-5-37

10.1076%2Fjcen.25.3.382.13801

10.1016%2Fj.neuroimage.2006.05.005

10.1016%2FS0197-4580%2897%2900056-0

10.1159%2F000101340

10.1016%2Fj.neuroimage.2004.07.031

10.1006%2Fnimg.2000.0596

10.1126%2Fscience.1069464

10.1016%2FS0893-133X%2802%2900364-0

10.1093%2Fcercor%2Fbhi044

10.1002%2Fgps.1678

10.1037%2F0882-7974.17.1.56

10.1212%2F01.wnl.0000237534.31734.1b

10.1017%2FS1355617702813248

10.1002%2F%28SICI%291097-0193%281999%297%3A2%3C115%3A%3AAID-HBM5%3E3.0.CO%3B2-N

10.1007%2Fs11065-007-9028-8