Frontostriatal activity and connectivity increase during proactive inhibition across adolescence and early adulthood

Human Brain Mapping - Tập 35 Số 9 - Trang 4415-4427 - 2014
Matthijs Vink1, Bram B. Zandbelt2, Thomas E. Gladwin3, Manon H. J. Hillegers1, Janna Marie Bas‐Hoogendam4, Wery P. M. van den Wildenberg5, Stéfan du Plessis6, René S. Kahn1
1Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
2Center for Integrative and Cognitive Neuroscience; Department of Psychology; Vanderbilt University; Nashville Tennessee
3EPAN Laboratory, Behavioural Science Institute (BSI), Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
4Developmental and Educational Psychology, Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Leiden, The Netherlands
5Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
6Department of Psychiatry, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa

Tóm tắt

AbstractDuring adolescence, functional and structural changes in the brain facilitate the transition from childhood to adulthood. Because the cortex and the striatum mature at different rates, temporary imbalances in the frontostriatal network occur. Here, we investigate the development of the subcortical and cortical components of the frontostriatal network from early adolescence to early adulthood in 60 subjects in a cross‐sectional design, using functional MRI and a stop‐signal task measuring two forms of inhibitory control: reactive inhibition (outright stopping) and proactive inhibition (anticipation of stopping). During development, reactive inhibition improved: older subjects were faster in reactive inhibition. In the brain, this was paralleled by an increase in motor cortex suppression. The level of proactive inhibition increased, with older subjects slowing down responding more than younger subjects when anticipating a stop‐signal. Activation increased in the right striatum, right ventral and dorsal inferior frontal gyrus, and supplementary motor area. Moreover, functional connectivity during proactive inhibition increased between striatum and frontal regions with age. In conclusion, we demonstrate that developmental improvements in proactive inhibition are paralleled by increases in activation and functional connectivity of the frontostriatal network. These data serve as a stepping stone to investigate abnormal development of the frontostriatal network in disorders such as schizophrenia and attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder. Hum Brain Mapp 35:4415–4427, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.024

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4682-05.2006

10.1207/S15326942DN2101_5

10.1002/hbm.21052

10.1371/journal.pone.0032316

10.1177/0963721413480170

10.1162/jocn.1997.9.6.835

10.1196/annals.1440.010

10.1093/cercor/bhn065

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3645-09.2009

10.1016/j.conb.2011.04.002

10.1152/jn.01334.2005

10.1038/nrn3313

10.1111/1467-7687.00235

10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.12.003

10.1038/nn.3344

10.1006/nimg.1997.0291

10.1371/journal.pone.0056191

10.1093/cercor/bhp225

10.1016/j.dcn.2011.06.008

10.1016/j.dcn.2013.08.004

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2825-10.2010

10.1162/jocn.2009.21307

10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.023

10.1093/cercor/bhj003

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6164-08.2009

10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.295

Logan GD, 1986, Dependence and independence in responding to double stimulation. A comparison of stop, change, and dual‐task paradigms, J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform, 12, 549

10.1016/S0065-2407(09)03706-9

10.1006/nimg.2000.0743

Paus T, 2008, Why do many psychiatric disorders emerge during adolescence? Nature Reviews, Neuroscience, 9, 947

10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.027

10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.07.030

10.1098/rstb.2007.2097

10.1002/hbm.20347

10.1371/journal.pone.0036896

10.1162/jocn.2010.21572

10.1016/j.bbr.2007.03.023

10.1097/00004583-200210000-00013

Laar MC, 2011, Lifespan changes in global and selective stopping and performance adjustments, Front Psychol, 2, 357

10.1162/jocn.2009.21248

10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.044

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1579-09.2009

10.1002/hbm.20111

10.1037/a0012726

10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.11.026

10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.07.034

10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.205

10.1371/journal.pone.0013848

10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.183

10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.07.028

10.1162/jocn_a_00309

10.1002/hbm.22047