Fostering historical thinking: The use of document based instruction for students with learning differences

Journal of Social Studies Research - Tập 46 - Trang 249-264 - 2022
Eric B. Claravall1, Robin Irey2
1California State University, Sacramento, USA
2Stanford University, USA

Tóm tắt

Document-based history instruction (DBI) was implemented in a middle school special education setting to promote the development of disciplinary cognitive processing and higher order thinking using historical thinking as a framework for students with learning differences (ld). A convergent mixed methods action research design was utilized to explore a) how DBI influenced students’ disciplinary cognitive processing and higherorder thinking when reading multiple historical documents b) the affordances and constraints of using DBI in a special education classroom. Using quantitative data sources (e.g., highlighted documents, reading comprehension responses, and an ondemand writing task) and additional qualitative data (e.g., interviews, fieldnotes, classroom artifacts, and audio recordings), we uncovered insightful evidence to support the potential of DBI for students with ld. In one academic year, when reading multiple historical sources, students learned how to efficiently highlight content knowledge and academic vocabulary, interrogate historical sources, and corroborate information from different sources.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alexander P.A., 1994, Review of Educational Research, 31, 313 10.1177/003172170508601006 10.1177/0022466912436813 10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80006-9 10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_2 10.1007/s11528-007-0039-3 10.2307/1511136 10.1177/00222194070400020301 10.1111/ldrp.12003 Bulgren J.A., 2006, Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 4, 39 Caverly D., 2000, Handbook of college reading and study strategy research, 105 10.1177/00222194020350060401 10.1177/0022219410393012 Creswell J.W., Creswell J.D. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches 5th ed.2018 Sage 10.1080/00933104.2014.908754 10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.139 10.1177/0741088312461591 10.1002/rrq.147 10.1177/00222194070400020901 10.3102/00346543069002145 10.2307/1511296 10.1177/00222194070400020501 10.1080/00377996.2011.622318 10.1177/00222194070400030301 10.1080/15391523.2009.10782545 10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102803 10.1177/0002764218772673 10.1177/0731948714550204 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00349.x 10.1177/00222194040370020201 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.10.001 Leutner D., 2007, Journal of Psychology, 215, 174 McCoy K., 2005, Focus on Exceptional Children, 38, 1 10.1007/s11145-010-9230-6 10.3102/0091732X07300046001 10.1177/1086296X12450445 10.1080/00940771.2013.11461851 10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.492 10.1177/0014402914563706 10.1080/00220272.2011.591436 10.1080/07370008.2011.634081 10.3200/TSSS.99.5.202-207 10.1080/00461520.2017.1329015 Saldaña J. Coding manual for qualitative researchers 2nd ed.2013 Sage Publication 10.1002/asi.23585 10.1080/00131857.2015.1101363 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 10.1007/s11145-016-9623-2 10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1 10.1177/0022219412451131 10.3102/00346543064001037 10.1080/07370008.2012.661813 10.1086/461893 10.3102/00028312028003495 Wineburg S. Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past 2001 Temple University Press Philadelphia, PA Wineburg S., 2009, Social Education, 73, 212 10.1007/s10648-014-9277-z
Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Social Studies Research

Tập 46

249-264

Thông tin tác giả