Forms of self-concept in gifted high school students enrolled in heterogeneous classes
Tóm tắt
Prior research has been devoted to understanding how to facilitate the integration of gifted young people (Intelligence Quotient, ≥130) into classroom settings. This study investigated a typology of self-concept in gifted French high school students. Eighty-four participants, between the ages of 13 and 18 (mean age, 15.5; SD, 1.04), enrolled in heterogeneous classes completed the Genèse des Perceptions de Soi (genesis of the self-concept (GPS) technique (L’Ėcuyer 1990), the Self-Description Questionnaire II (Marsh 1992), and the self-evaluation questionnaire concerning the perception of self and of giftedness (Guskin et al., Gifted Child Quarterly, 30(2):61–65, 1986). Using Descending Hierarchical Classification analysis (Alceste software), this study revealed five main types of self-concept for gifted young people. This study demonstrates the importance of considering the personal points of view of gifted adolescents in order to better comprehend the heterogeneous nature of their self-concept and emphasizes the need to use the specific profiles of these youth to adapt the way in which we respond to them.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ablard, K. E. (1997). Self-perception and needs as a function of type of academic ability and gender. Roeper Review, 20(2), 110–115.
Baillargeon, G., & Martin, L. (1998). Méthodes quantitatives et analyse des données en sciences humaines. Trois-Rivières Ouest: Les Éditions SMG.
Bain, S., & Bell, S. M. (2004). Social self-concept, social attributions and peer relationships in fourth, fifth and sixth graders who are gifted compared to high achievers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(3), 167–178.
Belleau, J. (2009). Mon intelligence vaut la tienne. Se redécouvrir à la lumière des intelligences multiples tout au long de la vie. Paris: Faubert.
Betts, G. T., & Kercher, J. K. (1999). Autonomous learner model: optimizing ability. Greeley: Autonomous Learning Publications and Specialists.
Byrne, B. M. (1996). Measuring self-concept across the life span. Issues and instrumentation. Washington: American Psychological Association.
Chan, D. W. (2003). Adjustment problems and multiple intelligences among gifted students in Hong Kong: the development of the revised student adjustment problems inventory. High Ability Studies, 14, 41–54.
Chan, D. W. (2004). Social coping and psychological distress among Chinese gifted students in Hong Kong. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 30–41.
Chan, D. W. (2008). Giftedness of Chinese students in Hong Kong: perspectives from different conceptions of intelligences. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 40–54.
Charlot, B., Bautier, E., & Rochex, J.-Y. (1992). Ecole et savoir dans les banlieues et ailleurs. Paris: Armand Colin.
Colangelo, N. (2003). Counseling gifted students. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 373–387). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Cornell, D. G., Pelton, G., Bassin, L., Landrum, M., & Ramsay, S. (1990). Self-concept and peer status of gifted program youth. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 456–463.
Cross, T. L. (2002). Competing with myths about the social and emotional development of gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 3(25), 44–45.
Davis, H. B., & Connell, J. P. (1985). The effect of aptitude and achievement status on the self-system. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29(3), 131–135.
Delaubier, J.-P. (2002). La scolarisation des élèves “intellectuellement précoces”. Paris: Rapport au Ministre de l’Education Nationale.
Dixon, F. A., Cross, T. L., & Adams, C. M. (2001). Psychological characteristics of academically gifted students in a residential setting: a cluster analysis. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 433–444.
Eccles, A. L., Bauman, E., & Rotenberg, K. J. (1989). Peer acceptance and self-esteem in gifted children. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 4, 401–409.
Field, T., Harding, J., Yando, R., Gonzalez, K., Lasko, D., Bendell, D., et al. (1998). Feelings and attitudes of gifted students. Adolescence, 33(130), 331–342.
Gallagher, J. J. (2003). Issues and challenges in the education of gifted students. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 11–23). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Gottfried, A. E., & Gottfried, A. W. (2004). Toward the development of a conceptualization of gifted motivation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 121–132.
Guerin, F., Marsh, H. W., & Famose, J. P. (2003). Construct validation of the Self-Description Questionnaire II with a French sample. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 142–150.
Guskin, S. L., Zimmerman, E., Okolo, C., & Peng, C. Y. (1986). Being labeled gifted or talented: Meanings and effects perceived by students in special programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30(2), 61–65.
Harter, S. (1986). Processes underlying the construction, maintenance, and enhancement of the self-concept in children. In J. Suls & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 3, pp. 137–181). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hoge, R. D., & McSheffrey, R. (1991). An investigation of self-concept in gifted children. Exceptional Children, 57, 238–245.
Hoge, R. D., & Renzulli, J. S. (1991). Self-concept and the gifted child. Storrs: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
Hollingworth, L. S. (1926). Gifted children: Their nature and nurture. New York: Macmillan.
Jacobs, J. (2004). Enjoyment of reading: a study of the Schoolwide Enrichment Model Reading Framework. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 65(6), 2987.
Kerr, B. A., & Cohn, S. J. (2001). Smart Boys: Talent, Manhood and the Search for Meaning. Scottsdale: Great Potential Press.
Kuhn, M., & McPartland, T. S. (1954). An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Review, 19, 68–76.
L’Ėcuyer, R. (1990). Méthodologie de l’analyse développementale de contenu: Méthode GPS et concept de soi. Sillery: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
Léa-Wood, S. S., & Clunies-Ross, G. (1995). Self-esteem of gifted adolescent girls in Australian schools. Roeper Review, 17(3), 195–197.
Marsh, H. W. (1992). Self Description Questionnaire (SDQ) II: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of adolescent self-concept. A test manual and research monograph. Macarthur: University of Western Sydney, Faculty of Education.
Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (1997). Academic self-concept: beyond the dustbowl. In G. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of classroom assessment: learning, achievement, and adjustment (pp. 143–156). Orlando: Academic.
Marsh, H. W., Plucker, J., & Stocking, V. B. (2001). The Self-description questionnaire II and gifted students: another look at Plucker, Taylor, Callahan & Tomchin’s (1997) “Mirror, Mirror on the Wall. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 976–996.
Massé, L., & Gagné, F. (2001). Adaptation socio-affective des élèves doués et relations avec les pairs. Revue Canadienne de Psychoéducation, 30(1), 15–37.
Mills, C. J., & Parker, W. D. (1998). Cognitive-psychological profiles of gifted adolescents from Ireland and the U.S.: cross-societal comparisons. International Journal of International Relations, 22, 1–16.
Moon, S. M. (2004). Social and emotional issues, underachievement and counseling. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
Mouchiroud, C. (2004). Haut potentiel intellectuel et développement social. Psychologie Française, 3(49), 293–304.
Neihart, M. (1999). The impact of giftedness on psychological well-being: what does the empirical literature say? Roeper Review, 22(1), 10–17.
Neihart, M., Reis, S., Robinson, N., & Moon, S. (Eds.). (2002). The social and emotional development of gifted children: what do we know? Waco: Prufrock.
Norman, A. D., Ramsay, S. G., Martray, C. R., & Roberts, J. L. (1999). Relationship between levels of giftedness and psychosocial adjustment. Roeper Review, 22, 5–10.
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in achievement settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578.
Pereira-Fradin, M. (2006). Les différences individuelles chez les enfants à haut potentiel. In T. Lubart (Ed.), Enfants exceptionnels: précocité intellectuelle, haut potentiel et talent (pp. 36–64). Paris: Bréal.
Perrodin-Carlen, D. (2007). Et si elle était surdouée? Lucerne: Editions SZH/CSPS.
Pourtois, J.-P. (1979). Comment les mères enseignent à leur enfant. Paris: PUF.
Prêteur, Y., & Vial, B. (1997). Rapports à l’écrit et à l’école de la famille et de l’enfant en 1ère année du cycle des apprentissages fondamentaux. In C. Barré de Miniac & B. Lété (Eds.), De la prévention chez l’enfant aux stratégies de formation chez l’adulte (pp. 103–128). Bruxelles: De Boeck Université.
Prêteur, Y., Constans, S., & Féchant, H. (2004). Rapport au savoir et (dé)mobilisation scolaire chez des collégiens de troisième. Pratiques Psychologiques, 10(2), 119–132.
Reinert, M. (1983). Une méthode de classification descendante hiérarchique: application à l’analyse lexicale par contexte. Les cahiers de l’analyse des données, 8(2), 187–198.
Reinert, M. (1990). Alceste, une méthodologie d’analyse des données textuelles et une application: Aurélia de Gérard de Nerval. Bulletin de méthodologie sociologique, 26, 24–54.
Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2004). Current research on the social and emotional development of gifted and talented students: good news and future possibilities. Psychology in the schools, 1(41), 119–130.
Revol, O., Louis, J., & Fourneret, P. (2004). L’enfant précoce: signes particuliers. Neuropsychiatrie de l’enfance et de l’adolescence, 52, 148–153.
Richards, J., Encel, J., & Shute, R. (2003). The emotional and behavioural adjustment of intellectually gifted adolescents: a multi-dimensional, multi-informant approach. High Ability Studies, 14(2), 153–164.
Robinson, A., & Clinkenbeard, P. R. (1998). Giftedness: an exceptionality examined. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 117–139.
Rodriguez-Tomé, H., Jackson, S., & Bariaud, F. (1997). Regards actuels sur l’adolescence. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Hall, L. E., Haggerty, D. J., Cooper, J. T., Golden, C. J., et al. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 167–177.
Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: a triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). The theory of successful intelligence as a basis for gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 265–277.
Swanson, J. D. (2006). Breaking through assumptions about low-income, minority gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 11–25.
Swiatek, M. A. (2001). Social coping among gifted high school students and its relationship to self-concept. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30, 19–39.
Terman, L. M. (1925). Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Tong, J., & Yewchuk, C. (1996). Self concept and sex-role orientation in gifted high school students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40(1), 15–23.
Vaivre-Douret, L. (2004). Les caractéristiques développementales d’un échantillon d’enfants tout-venant “à hautes potentialités” (surdoués): suivi prophylactique. Neuropsychiatrie de l’enfance et de l’adolescence, 52, 129–141.
Vrignaud, P. (2002). L’identification des surdoués: chimère psychométrique ou réalité psychologique ? Rouen: Communication aux 15èmes Journées de Psychologie Différentielle.
Wickes, K. (2004). Developing creative competencies in adolescence: comparing implicit theories and creative abilities in the gifted and non-gifted adolescent. Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64(8), 1200.
Wigfield, A., & Karpathian, M. (1991). Who am I and what can I do? Children’s self-concepts and motivation in achievement settings. Educational Psychologist, 26, 233–262.
Wilgenbusch, T., & Merrell, K. W. (1999). Gender differences in self-concept among children and adolescents: a meta-analysis of multidimensional studies. School Psychology Quarterly, 14(2), 101–120.
Winner, E. (2000). The origins and ends of giftedness. American Psychologist, 1(55), 159–169.
Worrell, F. C., Roth, D. A., & Gabelko, N. H. (1998). Age and gender differences in the self-concepts of academically talented students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9, 157–162.