Forest Landscape Restoration and Its Impact on Social Cohesion, Ecosystems, and Rural Livelihoods: Lessons Learned from Pakistan
Tóm tắt
This paper explores community perspectives on forest landscape restoration (FLR) initiatives and their impacts on ecosystems, livelihoods and social cohesion. The study is based on data collected from 08 focus group discussions (FGDs) conducted in local communities involved in FLR activities. A coding process was used to identify key themes and patterns that shed light on the impacts of FLR. The results show that FLR initiatives have led to social cohesion and conflict resolution, including the establishment of community-based organizations (CBOs), the involvement of community volunteers in various FLR tasks, a cooperative/collaborative approach to forest management, conflict resolution, and the empowerment of local communities. In addition, the results of the study showed that FLRs have successfully regenerated and restored the forest ecosystem, including restoration of biodiversity, plant diversity, improvement of animal populations and livestock health, soil health, and water quality. Ecosystem restoration has improved community livelihoods, including increased crop productivity, access to education, affordable health care, improved economic conditions, and food security. Based on the findings, policy recommendations include strengthening support for community FLR initiatives, promoting stakeholder collaboration, and promoting social equity.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adams C, Rodrigues ST, Calmon M, Kumar C (2016) Impacts of large-scale forest restoration on socioeconomic status and local livelihoods: what we know and do not know. Biotropica 48(6):731–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12385
Aryal JP, Sapkota TB, Rahut DB, Krupnik TJ, Shahrin S, et al. (2020) Major climate risks and adaptation strategies of smallholder farmers in coastal Bangladesh. Environ Manage 66(1):105–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01291-8
Bavorová M, Ullah A, Nyendu D, Prishchepov AV (2023) Determinants of farmland abandonment in the urban–rural fringe of Ghana. Regional Environ Change 23(4):122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-023-02117-z
Biland M, Zeb A, Ullah A, Kaechele H (2021) Why do households depend on the forest for income? Analysis of factors influencing households’ decision-making behaviors. Sustainability 13(16):9419. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169419
Brancalion PH, Holl KD (2020) Guidance for successful tree planting initiatives. J Appl Ecology 57(12):2349–2361. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13725
Buma B, Wessman CA (2013) Forest resilience, climate change, and opportunities for adaptation: a specific case of a general problem. Forest Eco Manage 306:216–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.044
Burivalova Z, Hua F, Koh LP, Garcia C, Putz F (2017) A critical comparison of conventional, certified, and community management of tropical forests for timber in terms of environmental, economic, and social variables. Conserv Lett 10(1):4–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12244
Chazdon RL, Uriarte M (2016) Natural regeneration in the context of large-scale forest and landscape restoration in the tropics. Biotropica 48(6):709–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12409
Crouzeilles R, Curran M (2016) Which landscape size best predicts the influence of forest cover on restoration success? A global meta-analysis on the scale of effect. J Appl Eco 53(2):440–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12590
Dang X, Gao S, Tao R, Liu G, Xia Z, et al. (2020) Do environmental conservation programs contribute to sustainable livelihoods? Evidence from China’s grain-for-green program in northern Shaanxi province. Sci Total Environ 719:137436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137436
Djenontin IN, Zulu LC (2021) The quest for context-relevant governance of agro-forest landscape restoration in Central Malawi: Insights from local processes. Forest Policy Eco 131:102555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102555
Erbaugh JT, Oldekop JA (2018) Forest landscape restoration for livelihoods and well-being. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 32:76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.05.007
Gatica-Saavedra P, Aburto F, Rojas P, Echeverría C (2023) Soil health indicators for monitoring forest ecological restoration: A critical review. Restoration Eco 31(5):e13836. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13836
Harrison RD, Swinfield T, Ayat A, Dewi S, Silalahi M, et al. (2020) Restoration concessions: a second lease on life for beleaguered tropical forests? Front Eco Environ 18(10):567–575. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2265
Kandel GP, Bavorova M, Ullah A, Kaechele H, Pradhan P (2023) Building resilience to climate change: Examining the impact of agro-ecological zones and social groups on sustainable development. Sustain Develop 31(5):3796–3810. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2626
Kokorsch M, Gísladóttir J (2023) “You talk of threat, but we think of comfort”: the role of place attachment in small remote communities in Iceland that experience avalanche threat. Reg Environ Change 23(4):150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-023-02144-w
Lim CL, Prescott GW, De Alban JDT, Ziegler AD, Webb EL (2017) Untangling the proximate causes and underlying drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in Myanmar. Conserv Bio 31(6):1362–1372. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12984
Löf M, Madsen P, Metslaid M, Witzell J, Jacobs DF (2019) Restoring forests: regeneration and ecosystem function for the future. New Forests 50:139–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-019-09713-0
Loivaranta T (2023) Geographies of knowledge creation in forest rights claims-making processes among Indigenous communities in Central India. Land Use Policy 131:106741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106741
Ma S, Wang HY, Wang LJ, Jiang J, Gong JW, et al. (2022) Evaluation and simulation of landscape evolution and its ecological effects under vegetation restoration in the northern sand prevention belt China. Catena 218:106555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2022.106555
Mansourian S, Berrahmouni N, Blaser J, Dudley N, Maginnis S, et al. (2021) Reflecting on twenty years of forest landscape restoration. Restoration Eco 29(7):e13441. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13441
Mayer AL (2019) Family forest owners and landscape-scale interactions: A review. Landscape Urban Plan 188:4–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.10.017
Meadows J, Herbohn J, Emtage N (2013) Supporting cooperative forest management among small-acreage lifestyle landowners in Southeast Queensland Australia. Soc Natural Res 26(7):745–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2012.719586
Montana E, Diaz HP, Hurlbert M (2016) Development, local livelihoods, and vulnerabilities to global environmental change in the South American Dry Andes. Reg Environ Change 16(8):2215–2228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0888-9
Mori AS, Lertzman KP, Gustafsson L (2017) Biodiversity and ecosystem services in forest ecosystems: a research agenda for applied forest ecology. J Appli Eco 54(1):12–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12669
Nghiem TPL, Wong KL, Jeevanandam L, Chang CC, Tan LYC, et al. (2021) Biodiverse urban forests, happy people: Experimental evidence linking perceived biodiversity, restoration, and emotional wellbeing. Urban Forest Urban Green 59:127030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127030
Nguyen TT, Grote U, Neubacher F, Do MH, Paudel GP (2023) Security risks from climate change and environmental degradation: implications for sustainable land use transformation in the Global South. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 63:101322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101322
Pires AP, Rezende CL, Assad ED, Loyola R, Scarano FR (2017) Forest restoration can increase the Rio Doce watershed resilience. Perspect Eco Conserv 15(3):187–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2017.08.003
Rauf T, Khan N, Shah SJ, Zada M, Malik SY, et al. (2019) Poverty and prosperity: impact on livelihood assets of billion trees afforestation program in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) Pakistan. Forests 10(10):916. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10100916
Rojas-Downing MM, Nejadhashemi AP, Harrigan T, Woznicki SA (2017) Climate change and livestock: Impacts, adaptation, and mitigation. Climate Risk Manage 16:145–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2017.02.001
Sacande M, Berrahmouni N (2016) Community participation and ecological criteria for selecting species and restoring natural capital with native species in the Sahel. Restoration Eco 24(4):479–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12337
Ullah A, Arshad M, Kächele H, Khan A, Mahmood N, et al. (2020) Information asymmetry, input markets, adoption of innovations and agricultural land use in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan. Land Use Pol 90:104261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104261
Ullah A, Bavorova M, Shah AA, Kandel GP (2023) Community participation in development programs: Key lessons from the billion trees afforestation project (BTAP). Environ Sci Pol 150:103581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103581
Ullah A, Mishra AK, Bavorova M (2023) Agroforestry adoption decision in green growth initiative programs: key lessons from the billion trees afforestation project (BTAP). Environ Manage 71(5):950–964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-023-01797-x
Ullah A, Sam AS, Sathyan AR, Mahmood N, Zeb A, et al. (2021) Role of local communities in forest landscape restoration: Key lessons from the Billion Trees Afforestation Project Pakistan. Sci Total Environ 772:145613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145613
Ullah A, Zeb A, Saqib SE, Kächele H (2022) Landscape co-management and livelihood sustainability: Lessons learned from the billion trees afforestation project in Pakistan. Land Use Policy 115:106034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106034
Ullah A, Zeb A, Saqib SE, Kächele H (2022) Constraints to agroforestry diffusion under the billion trees afforestation project (BTAP), Pakistan: policy recommendations for 10-BTAP. Environ Sci Poll Res 29(45):68757–68775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20661-9
Ullah A, Zeb A, Shah AA, Bavorova M (2023c). From education to rehabilitation: empowering farming communities through extension services for landscape restoration. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03452-1
Wang H, Tian F, Wu J, Nie X (2023) Is China forest landscape restoration (FLR) worth it? A cost-benefit analysis and non-equilibrium ecological view. World Development 161:106126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106126
Wassie SB (2020) Natural resource degradation tendencies in Ethiopia: a review. Environ Syst Res 9(1):1–29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-020-00194-1
Weston P, Hong R, Kaboré C, Kull CA (2015) Farmer-managed natural regeneration enhances rural livelihoods in dryland West Africa. Environ Manage 55(6):1402–1417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0469-1
Wiegant D, van Oel P, Dewulf A (2022) Scale-sensitive governance in forest and landscape restoration: a systematic review. Reg Environ Change 22(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-022-01889-0
Wolff NH, Masuda YJ, Meijaard E, Wells JA, Game ET (2018) Impacts of tropical deforestation on local temperature and human well-being perceptions. Global Environ Change 52:181–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.004
Yadeta T, Deribew KT, Getahun K, Debesa G, Abreha G, et al. (2022) Recent resettlement programs, as drivers for Afromontane forest loss in the Hawa-Galan district of Ethiopia. Cogent Soc Sci 8(1):2088462. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2088462
Zafar Z, Mehmood MS, Shiyan Z, Zubair M, Sajjad M, et al. (2023) Fostering deep learning approaches to evaluate the impact of urbanization on vegetation and future prospects. Ecolog Indicators 146:109788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109788
Zhang J, Fu B, Stafford-Smith M, Wang S, Zhao W (2021) Improve forest restoration initiatives to meet Sustainable Development Goal 15. Nature Eco Evol 5(1):10–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01332-9