Fluid Residuals and Drug Exposure in Nasal Irrigation

Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery - Tập 141 - Trang 757-761 - 2009
Richard J. Harvey1,2, Nick Debnath2, Aviva Srubiski1, Ben Bleier2, Rodney J. Schlosser2
1Department of Otolaryngology/Skull Base Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
2Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC

Tóm tắt

OBJECTIVE

Topical treatment options in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) are growing with our increased understanding of the inflammatory process. Additives to irrigation devices have become popular. Additives such as menthol provide little more than sensory feedback. However, glucocorticosteroids and antibiotics represent powerful pharmaceutical agents for which we have little knowledge regarding patient exposure and absorption. There is little data on fluid retained after nasal irrigation. The purpose of this study was to determine the residual volume and percentage of total nasal irrigation that is retained from a neti pot (NasaFlo) or squeeze bottle (Sinus Rinse).

STUDY DESIGN

Cross‐sectional study.

SETTING

Tertiary rhinologic clinic.

METHODS

Patients with CRS were already using saline irrigation in their treatment. Participants were divided into pre and post sinus surgery (ESS). Control irrigations on 17 healthy patients with no sinonasal complaints were collected. Nasal irrigation was performed with accurate collection of the excess to determine retained amount.

RESULTS

Overall retention of fluid was 2.5 ± 1.6 percent. This represents only 5.8 ± 3.8 mL for the 240‐mL irrigations. Squeeze bottle and neti pot were similar: 2.3 ±1.3 percent and 3.0 ± 2.2 percent, respectively (P = 0.23). CRS (pre‐ESS) patients had the least retained volume: 1.4 ± 1.2 percent. Post‐ESS retained volume was 2.36 ± 1.18 percent. Control patients retained 2.2 ± 1.2 percent.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantification of the residual volume has important implications for the treatment of inflammatory disease with saline, as well as for potentially novel topical therapies. The information helps to define the fluid dynamics during nasal irrigation. The data are important to address concerns regarding drug or salt exposure from a very common intervention.


Tài liệu tham khảo

HarveyR HannanSA BadiaL et al.Nasal saline irrigations for the symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev2007:CD006394. 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3122 10.1001/archoto.2008.555 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3189 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00894.x Fokkens W, 2007, European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2007, Rhinol Suppl, 20, 1 10.1097/00005537-200402000-00004 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.04.020 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31818208c1 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3221 Hyo N, 1989, Particle deposition efficiency of therapeutic aerosols in the human maxillary sinus, Rhinology, 27, 17 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3191 10.1097/01.mlg.0000149463.95950.c5 10.1097/00005537-200208000-00013 10.1016/j.otohns.2003.10.007 Merkus P, 2006, The ‘best method’ of topical nasal drug delivery: comparison of seven techniques, Rhinology, 44, 102 10.2500/ajra.2009.23.3265 10.2500/ajr.2006.20.2904 10.1002/ppul.1125 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31817aec47 10.1067/mai.2003.1481