Floor Behavior in the U.S. Congress: Committee Power Under the Open Rule

American Political Science Review - Tập 83 Số 3 - Trang 795-815 - 1989
Barry R. Weingast1
1Hoover Institution

Tóm tắt

The open rule in the House is a complex set of restrictions, limiting, for example, the number of motions and the order of recognition. By incorporating constraints based on the actual set of rules into a model, I show that legislative outcomes appear more predictable than was previously thought. These rules nearly always allow the proponents of legislation to respond to an opponent's amendment, mitigating the potential damage of the latter. An advantage of the approach is that it provides a new interpretation of the changes in floor activity observed in the postreform period.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Fenno, 1962, New Perspectives on the House of Representatives

Baron, 1987, The Power to Propose

Hall, 1985, The Role of the Subcommittee in Committee Decision Making: An Explanation

Olson, 1976, The Politics of Legislation

Baron, 1989, Bargaining in Legislatures, 10.2307/1961664

Austen-Smith, 1986, Endogenous Agenda Formation under Incomplete Information

Fenno, 1973, Congressmen in Committees

10.2307/2110891

Axelrod, 1984, The Evolution of Cooperation

Froman, 1967, The Congressional Process

Fenno, 1966, Power of the Purse: Appropriations Politics in Congress

Oleszek, 1984, Congressional Procedure and the Policy Process

Banks, 1985, Endogenous Agenda Formation in Three-Person Committees

10.2307/1962684

Weingast, 1989, Fighting Fire with Fire: Amending Activity and Institutional Change in the Post-Reform Congress

Gilligan, 1987, Collective Decisionmaking and Standing Committees: An Informational Rationale for Restrictive Amendment Procedures, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 3, 287

Rieselbach, 1973, Congressional Politics

Bach, 1986, Representatives and Committees on the Floor: Amendments to Appropriation Bills in the House of Representatives, 1963–82

10.1007/BF00156812

Kreps, 1984, Corporate Culture

Deschler, 1982, Procedure in the U.S. House of Representatives

10.1086/261528

10.2307/2110356

Humes, 1987, Choice of a Gernmaness Rule

10.1016/0022-0531(76)90040-5

Milgrom, 1989, The Role of Institutions in the Revival of Trade, Part I: The Medieval Law Merchant

Polsby, 1986, Congress and the Presidency

10.2307/1912531

Riker, 1987, Asymmetric Information and the Coherence of Legislation, American Political Science Review, 81, 897, 10.2307/1962682

10.2307/2297259

Shepsle, 1981, Structure and Strategy

Sinclair, 1983, Majority Leadership in the U.S. House

Smith, 1986, Revolution in the House: Why Don't We Do It on the Floor

Sullivan, 1987, The Impact of Procedural Reform, 1960–80

Matthews, 1960, U.S. Senators and Their World

Ripley, 1967, Party Leaders in the House of Representatives

Calvert, 1987, Coordination and Power: The Foundation of Leadership among Rational Legislators

10.2307/2110787

Bach, 1987, The Amendment Process in the U.S. House

Hinckley, 1978, Stability and Change in Congress

10.2307/1960780