Flips, flops and foreclosures: anatomy of a real estate bubble

Journal of Financial Economic Policy - Tập 3 Số 1 - Trang 49-65 - 2011
Craig A.Depken1, HarrisHollans2, SteveSwidler2
1Department of Economics, Belk College of Business, UNC‐Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
2Department of Finance, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA

Tóm tắt

PurposeThis paper aims to examine the anatomy of a real estate bubble. In the process, the paper identifies three phases of the market's evolution: flips, flops and foreclosures. An examination of the Las Vegas real estate market illustrates the three phases.Design/methodology/approachThe paper examines transaction data from the metropolitan Las Vegas area (Clark County) from 1994 to 2009. The first part of the analysis identifies the three phases of the bubble and is descriptive in nature. This is followed by more formal tests of Granger causality.FindingsIn the early part of the sample, a large percentage of transactions are speculative or “flips” causing prices to rapidly increase. Eventually, flipping loses its profitability and over the last three years, there is an increasing number of foreclosures leading to falling prices. The descriptive analysis of the Las Vegas market is augmented with causality tests which show that prices were the driving force behind all three phases in the market's evolution.Research limitations/implicationsFuture research might focus on underlying structural inter‐temporal relationships to augment the Granger causality tests.Practical implicationsAnalysis shows that price is the driving force behind a bubble and that loan modification programs alone will not solve the current housing crisis.Social implicationsGovernment entities might expand neighborhood stabilization programs to affect both demand and supply of homes. Moreover, it might be prudent to include information related to flipping on multiple listing service agreements. Additionally, local governments should be consistent in their record keeping.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first paper to examine the housing bubble using an extensive set of transaction data.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bhutta, N., Dokko, J. and Shan, H. (2010), “The depth of negative equity and mortgage default decisions”, Finance and Economics Discussion Series No. 2010‐35, working paper, Federal Reserve Board, Washington, DC.

Brueckner, J.K. (1980), “A vintage model of urban growth”, Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 389‐402.

Capozza, D.R. and Helsley, R.W. (1989), “The fundamentals of land prices and urban growth”, Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 295‐306.

Case, K.E. and Quigley, J.M. (2008), “How housing booms unwind: income effects, wealth effects, and feedbacks through financial markets”, European Journal of Housing Policy, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 161‐80.

Depken, C.A. II, Hollans, H. and Swidler, S. (2009), “An empirical analysis of residential property flipping”, Journal of Real Estate Finance & Economics, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 248‐63.

Elul, R., Souleles, N., Glennon, D. and Hunt, R. (2010), “What triggers mortgage default?”, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Working Paper No. 10‐13, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.

Granger, C. (1969), “Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross spectral methods”, Econometrica, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 424‐38.

Kellogg, A. (2010), “Detroit shrinks itself, historic homes and all”, available at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703950804575242433435338728.html (accessed 24 July 2010).

Levitt, S. and Syverson, C. (2008), “Market distortions when agents are better informed: the value of information in real estate transactions”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 90 No. 4, pp. 599‐611.

Shiller, R. (2009), “Unlearned lessons from the housing bubble”, The Economists' Voice, Vol. 6 No. 7, p. 1.

Streitfeld, D. (2010), “Building is booming in a city of empty houses”, available at: www.nytimes.com/2010/05/16/business/16builder.html.

Wheaton, W. and Nechayev, G. (2008), “The 1998‐2005 housing ‘bubble’ and the current ‘correction’: what's different this time?”, Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 1‐26.

Zivot, D. and Andrews, D. (1992), “Further evidence on the great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis”, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 251‐70.

Dickey, D.A. and Fuller, W.A. (1979), “Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 74 No. 366, pp. 427‐31.

Immergluck, D. and Smith, G. (2006), “The external costs of foreclosure: the impact of single‐family mortgage foreclosures on property values”, Housing Policy Debate, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 57‐79.

Lin, Z., Rosenblatt, E. and Yao, V. (2009), “Spillover effects of foreclosure on neighborhood property values”, Journal of Real Estate Finance & Economics, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 387‐407.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Financial Economic Policy

Tập 3 Số 1

49-65

Thông tin tác giả