Fire treatment effects on vegetation structure, fuels, and potential fire severity in western U.S. forests

Ecological Applications - Tập 19 Số 2 - Trang 305-320 - 2009
Scott L. Stephens1, Jason J. Moghaddas, Carleton B. Edminster, Carl E. Fiedler, Sally M. Haase, Michael G. Harrington, Jon E. Keeley, Eric E. Knapp, James D. McIver, Kerry L. Metlen, Carl N. Skinner, Andrew Youngblood
1Division of Ecosystem Science, Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, 137 Mulford Hall, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3114, USA. [email protected]

Tóm tắt

Forest structure and species composition in many western U.S. coniferous forests have been altered through fire exclusion, past and ongoing harvesting practices, and livestock grazing over the 20th century. The effects of these activities have been most pronounced in seasonally dry, low and mid‐elevation coniferous forests that once experienced frequent, low to moderate intensity, fire regimes. In this paper, we report the effects of Fire and Fire Surrogate (FFS) forest stand treatments on fuel load profiles, potential fire behavior, and fire severity under three weather scenarios from six western U.S. FFS sites. This replicated, multisite experiment provides a framework for drawing broad generalizations about the effectiveness of prescribed fire and mechanical treatments on surface fuel loads, forest structure, and potential fire severity. Mechanical treatments without fire resulted in combined 1‐, 10‐, and 100‐hour surface fuel loads that were significantly greater than controls at three of five FFS sites. Canopy cover was significantly lower than controls at three of five FFS sites with mechanical‐only treatments and at all five FFS sites with the mechanical plus burning treatment; fire‐only treatments reduced canopy cover at only one site. For the combined treatment of mechanical plus fire, all five FFS sites with this treatment had a substantially lower likelihood of passive crown fire as indicated by the very high torching indices. FFS sites that experienced significant increases in 1‐, 10‐, and 100‐hour combined surface fuel loads utilized harvest systems that left all activity fuels within experimental units. When mechanical treatments were followed by prescribed burning or pile burning, they were the most effective treatment for reducing crown fire potential and predicted tree mortality because of low surface fuel loads and increased vertical and horizontal canopy separation. Results indicate that mechanical plus fire, fire‐only, and mechanical‐only treatments using whole‐tree harvest systems were all effective at reducing potential fire severity under severe fire weather conditions. Retaining the largest trees within stands also increased fire resistance.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Agee J. K., 2003, The fallacy of passive management., Conservation Biology in Practice, 1, 18

10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00116-4

10.4996/fireecology.0202003

10.1016/j.foreco.2005.01.034

10.1016/j.foreco.2005.09.009

Arno S. F., 1980, Forest fire history in the northern Rockies., Journal of Forestry, 78, 460

Arno S. F., 2005, Mimicking nature's fire: restoring fire-prone forests in the west

Bahro B., 2007, Restoring fire-adapted ecosystems. Proceedings of the 2005 National Silviculture Workshop, June 6–10, 2005, Tahoe City, CA. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-203, 41

Biswell H. H., 1989, Prescribed burning in California wildland vegetation management, 10.1525/9780520354067

Brown J. K., 1974, Handbook for inventorying downed woody material. General Technical Report, INT-16

Burgan R. E., 2005, Standard fire behavior fuel models: a comprehensive set for use with Rothermel's surface fire spread model. RMRS-GTR-153

Carlton D., 2004, Fuels Management Analyst Plus Software, Version 3.8.19

Collins B. M., 2008, Interactions among wildland fires in a long-established Sierra Nevada natural fire area., Ecosystems

10.1890/070007

Cram D. S., 2006, Wildland fire effects in silviculturally treated vs. untreated stands of New Mexico and Arizona. Paper RMRS-RP-55, 10.2737/RMRS-RP-55

Crosby J. S., 1966, Get the most from your windspeed observation., Fire Control Notes, 27, 12

Dibble A. C., 2005, Does the lack of reference ecosystems limit our science? A case study in nonnative invasive plants as forest fuels., Journal of Forestry, 103, 329

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00491.x

10.1071/WF02042

10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0053:OASWDA]2.0.CO;2

Fiedler C. E., 2003, Reducing crown fire hazard in fire-adapted forests of New Mexico. Proceedings RMRS-P-29

Fiedler C. E., 2003, Fire hazard and potential treatment effectiveness: a statewide assessment in Montana., Journal of Forestry, 101

10.2737/PNW-GTR-622

Finney M. A., 2001, Design of regular landscape fuel treatment patterns for modifying fire growth and behavior., Forest Science, 47, 219

10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.010

10.1139/x05-090

10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00655.x

Fulé P. Z., 2001, Ponderosa pine ecosystems restoration and conservation: steps towards stewardship. Proceedings RMRS-22, 28

Graham R. T., 2003, General Technical Report RMRSGTR-114

Graham R. T., 2004, General Technical Report RMRSGTR-120

10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.015

10.1016/j.forpol.2008.02.001

10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.016

10.1191/0959683602hl570rp

10.1525/california/9780520246058.003.0019

10.1093/forestry/72.1.59

10.1111/j.1654-1103.2005.tb02362.x

10.2307/1936475

10.1016/j.foreco.2005.01.016

Main W. A., 1990, Fire Family Plus. General Technical Report, NC-138

10.1071/WF07005

10.1890/07-1785.1

McKelvey K. S., 1996, Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report to Congress. Volume II: assessments and scientific basis for management options. Wildland Resources Center Report 37, 1033

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00492.x

Metlen K. L., 2004, Understory response to fuel reduction treatments in the Blue Mountains of northeastern Oregon., Northwest Science, 78, 175

10.1890/06-1715.1

10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0085:MTEOFM]2.0.CO;2

10.1016/j.foreco.2007.11.011

10.1007/s10584-007-9361-1

Omi P. N., 2004, Proceedings of the Sierra Nevada Science Symposium, 2002 October 7–10, Kings Beach, California. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-193, 87

10.1016/0378-1127(79)90034-3

10.1016/S0360-1285(03)00017-0

10.1139/x05-212

10.2737/PNW-GTR-628

10.1071/WF01045

10.1139/x05-206

10.1016/j.foreco.2007.04.044

Rothermel R. C., 1983, How to predict the spread and intensity of forest and range fires. GTR-INT-143, 10.2737/INT-GTR-143

Sall J., 2001, A guide to statistics and data analysis using JMP and JUMP IN software

10.1016/j.foreco.2008.01.023

10.1890/07-1747.1

Scott J. H., 2006, Comparison of crown fire modeling systems used in three fire management applications. Research Paper RMRS-RP-58, 10.2737/RMRS-RP-58

Scott J. H., 2001, Assessing crown fire potential by linking models of surface and crown fire behavior. Research Paper RMRS–29, 10.2737/RMRS-RP-29

Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project., 1996, Summary of the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project Report. Wildland Resources Center Report 39, 4

Skinner C. N., 2005, Proceedings of the symposium on ponderosa pine: issues, trends, and management. October 18–21, 2004, Klamath Falls, Oregon. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-198, 245

Skinner C. N., 1996, Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, Final Report to Congress. Volume II. Assessments and scientific basis for management options, 1041

Skinner C. N., 2004, Proceedings 25th annual vegetation management conference, January 2004, Redding, California, 80

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00389.x

10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00293-4

Stephens S. L., 2005, Western pine forests with continuing frequent fire regimes: possible reference sites for management., Journal of Forestry, 103, 357

10.1016/j.foreco.2007.06.005

10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.070

10.1016/j.biocon.2005.04.007

10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.055

10.1890/04-0545

Strom B. A., 2005, Pre-fire treatment effects and post-fire forest dynamics on the Rodeo-Chediski burn area, Arizona

10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00353.x

10.1071/WF04051

USDA and USDI., 2005, Wildland fire use implementation procedures reference guide

van Wagner C. E., 1968, The line intercept method in forest fuel sampling., Forest Science, 14, 20

van Wagtendonk J. W., 1996, Assessments and scientific basis for management options. Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, final report to congress, volume II, 1155

10.1071/WF9960117

van Wagtendonk J. W., 1998, Fuel bed characteristics of Sierra Nevada conifers., Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 13, 1145, 10.1093/wjaf/13.3.73

Weatherspoon C. P., 2000, A national study of the consequences of fire and fire surrogate treatments

Weatherspoon C. P., 1996, Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report to Congress, Vol. II: Assessments and scientific basis for management options. Wildland Resources Center Report No. 37, 1471

10.1126/science.1128834

10.1016/j.foreco.2006.06.033

10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.032

Zar J. H., 1999, Biostatistical analysis

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Ecological Applications

Tập 19 Số 2

305-320

Thông tin tác giả