Feedback on Quality:

International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance - Tập 7 Số 3 - Trang 27-32 - 1994
EmilieRoberts1, RalphLeavey2, DavidAllen3, GrahamGibbs4
1Research Officer, North West Surveys and Research Unit, Manchester Health Authority.
2Senior Lecturer, Centre for Health Services Research, St Martin’s College, University of Lancaster.
3Senior Lecturer, North West Regional Health Authority, Manchester.
4Senior Lecturer, University of Huddersfield School of Human and Health Sciences, Huddersfield, UK.

Tóm tắt

There is a growing consensus within the NHS of the importance of obtaining feedback from patients in order to improve the quality of health care; consequently, many patient satisfaction surveys are now undertaken. However, much research is based on provider‐held assumptions about service quality. This study focuses on patient satisfaction with coronary bypass surgery, starting with the concerns expressed by patients and using these as a basis for evaluating different aspects of care. The paired comparison technique was employed to produce a ranked list of aspects of care that were perceived to be in greatest need of improvement. Some difficulties were encountered in administering the ranking technique to patients in a highly specialized health‐care setting; however, results were obtained and validated for follow‐up patients. The item of most concern to these patients was a lack of sensitivity about when patients felt ready for discharge.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

1. Aharony, L. and Strasser, S., “Patient Satisfaction – What we Know About and What Is Still Unexplored”, Medical Care Review, Vol. 50 No. 1, Spring 1993, pp. 49‐79.

2. Locker, D. and Dunt, D., “Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Sociological Studies of Consumer Satisfaction with Medical Care”, Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 12, 1978, pp. 283‐92.

3. Fitzpatrick, R. and Hopkins, A., “Problems in the Conceptual Framework of Patient Satisfaction Research: An Empirical Exploration”, Sociology of Health and Illness, Vol. 3, 1983, pp. 297‐311.

4. Pryce‐Jones, D.M., “Not How Many But Why: A Qualitative Approach to Customer Relations”, Health Services Management, Vol. 84, 1986, pp. 175‐7.

5. Fitzpatrick, R. and Hopkins, A., “Patient Satisfaction in Relation to Clinical Care: A Neglected Contribution”, in Fitzpatrick, R. and Hopkins, A. (Eds), Measurement of Patients’ Satisfaction with Their Care, Royal College of Physicians, London, 1993.

6. NHS, “NHS Policy Board”, Policy Board (93) 6, 31 March 1993, p. 3.

7. Cartwright, A., Patients and Their Doctors – A Study of General Practice, Routledge, London, 1967.

8. Cartwright, A. and Anderson, R., General Practice Revisited: A Second Study of Patients and Their Doctors, Tavistock, London, 1981.

9. Prescott‐Clarke, P., Brooks, T. and Machray, C., Focus on Health Care: Surveying the Public in Four Health Districts, Social and Community Planning Research and Royal Institute of Public Administration, London, 1988.

10. Hulka, B.S. and Zyzanski, S.J., “Validation of a Patient Satisfaction Scale: Theory, Methods and Practice”, Medical Care, Vol. 20, 1982, p. 6.

11. Pascoe, G.C., “Patient Satisfaction in Primary Health Care: A Literature Review and Analysis”, Evaluation and Programme Planning, Vol. 6, 1983, pp. 185‐210.

12. Ware, J.E. and Hays, R.D., “Methods for Measuring Patient Satisfaction with Specific Medical Encounters”, Medical Care, Vol. 26, 1988, p. 323.

13. Guilford, J.P., Psychometric Methods, Maple, New York, NY, 1954.

14. Salford Health Authority, Listening to Salford Voices, Salford Health Authority, Salford, 1992.

15. Trafford Health Authority, Patient Hotel Services Survey, Trafford Health Authority, Trafford, 1992.

16. North Western Regional Health Authority, Regional Korner Episode System General Patient Masterfile 1991/92, North Western Regional Health Authority, 1992.

17. Weller, S.C. and Romney, A.K., Systematic Data Collection, Sage, Newbury Park, Beverly Hills, CA, 1988.