Familiarity, Complexity, and Team Performance in Geographically Distributed Software Development

Organization Science - Tập 18 Số 4 - Trang 613-630 - 2007
J. Alberto Espinosa1, Sandra A. Slaughter2, Robert E. Kraut3, James D. Herbsleb3
1Kogod School of Business, American University, Washington, D.C. 20016
2College of Management, Georgia Tech University, Atlanta, Georgia 30332#TAB#
3Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213

Tóm tắt

While prior research has found that familiarity is beneficial to team performance, it is not clear whether different kinds of familiarity are more or less beneficial when the work has different types of complexity. In this paper, we theorize how task and team familiarity interact with task and team coordination complexity to influence team performance. We posit that task familiarity is more beneficial with more complex tasks (i.e., tasks that are larger or with more complex structures) and that team familiarity is more beneficial when team coordination is more difficult (i.e., for larger or geographically dispersed teams). Finally, we propose that the effects of task familiarity and team familiarity on team performance are complementary. Based on a field study of geographically distributed software teams, two of our hypotheses are disconfirmed: Our results show that the beneficial effects of task familiarity decline when tasks are more structurally complex and are independent of task size. Conversely, the hypotheses for team familiarity are confirmed as the benefit of team familiarity for team performance is enhanced when team coordination is more challenging—i.e., when teams are larger or geographically dispersed. Finally, surprisingly, we find that task and team familiarity are more substitutive than complementary in their joint effects on team performance: Task familiarity improves team performance more strongly when team familiarity is weak and vice versa. Our study contributes by revealing how different types of familiarity can enhance team performance in a real-world setting where the task and its coordination can be highly complex.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Aiken L., 1991, Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions

10.2307/3250961

10.1002/bs.3830090302

Allen T., 1977, Managing the Flow of Technology

10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb01765.x

Armstrong D. J., 2002, Distributed Work, 187, 10.7551/mitpress/2464.003.0013

10.1287/isre.11.3.219.12209

10.1145/163359.163375

10.1287/mnsc.44.4.433

10.1002/0471725153

Boehm B. R., 1981, Software Engineering Economics

10.1287/orsc.1040.0069

Brooks F., 1995, The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering

10.2307/258353

Cannon-Bowers J. A., 1993, Individual and Group Decision-Making: Current Issues, 221

Carmel E., 1999, Global Software Teams

Cohen J., 1983, Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

10.1177/014920639702300303

Cohen S. G., 2003, Virtual Teams that Work: Creating Conditions for Virtual Team Effectiveness, 1

10.1287/orsc.12.3.346.10098

10.1147/sj.372.0227

10.1145/50087.50089

10.1109/TSE.1979.234165

10.1109/TSE.2005.130

10.2307/1924845

10.1080/07421222.2003.11045746

10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1554.12072

Gittell J. H., 2001, Acad. Management J., 12, 468

10.1037/0021-9010.73.1.81

10.1037/0021-9010.76.4.578

Goodman P. S., 1992, Group Processes and Productivity, 578

Greene W., 1997, Econometric Analysis

10.2307/30036531

10.1023/A:1008719814496

10.1006/obhd.1996.0061

Hackman R., 1987, Handbook of Organizational Behavior

10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00753.x

10.1109/52.795103

10.1109/TSE.2003.1205177

10.1287/orsc.1050.0122

Hinds P., 2003, Virtual Teams that Work: Creating Conditions for Virtual Team Effectiveness, 21

10.1287/orsc.14.6.615.24872

10.1006/obhd.1999.2875

Jackard J., 2003, Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression, 10.4135/9781412984522

Kanki B. G., 1989, Aviation, Space, Environ. Medicine, 60, 402

10.2307/2392547

10.1007/BF02249043

10.1109/32.799945

Kennedy P., 1992, A Guide to Econometrics

10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.339

Kiesler S., 2002, Distributed Work, 57, 10.7551/mitpress/2464.003.0007

10.1177/0149206305279113

Klimoski R. J., 1994, J. Management, 20, 403

10.1145/203330.203345

10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.587

10.1287/orsc.1050.0143

10.1177/0146167295214009

10.1006/obhd.1997.2677

10.1145/174666.174668

Mann C. C., 2002, Tech. Rev., 105, 33

10.2307/1267205

10.1177/1046496491222001

Mockus A., 2002, 24th Internat. Conf. Software Engrg.

O’Leary M. B., 2007, MIS Quart.

10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_4

10.1109/52.300082

10.1145/968464.968467

10.1287/mnsc.1050.0366

10.2307/1884852

Simon H. A., 1996, The Sciences of the Artificial

Sproull L., 1991, Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization

10.1006/jesp.1995.1012

Steiner I., 1972, Group Process and Productivity

10.1109/TSE.2002.1019481

Thompson J., 1967, Organizations in Action

Van de Ven A. H., 1976, Amer. Sociol. Rev., 41, 322, 10.2307/2094477

10.2307/257088

10.1145/163430.163447

Watson D., Finholt T. Measurement of group participation patterns. (1986) . Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA

10.1521/soco.1995.13.3.319

10.2307/2393372

10.1016/0749-5978(86)90044-0

10.1080/07421222.2003.11045831

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Organization Science

Tập 18 Số 4

613-630

Thông tin tác giả