Factors influencing planning of a familiar grasp to an object: what it is to pick a cup
Tóm tắt
We assessed the factors influencing the planning of actions required to manipulate one of two everyday objects with matching dimensions but openings at opposite ends: a cup and a vase. We found that, for cups, measures of movement preparation to reach and grasp the object were influenced by whether the grasp was made to the functional part of the object (wide opening) and whether the action would end in a supinated as opposed to a pronated grasp. These factors interacted such that effects of hand posture were found only when a less familiar grasp was made to the non-functional part of the cup (the base). These effects were not found with the vase, which has a less familiar location for grasping. We interpret the results in terms of a parallel model of action selection, modulated by both the familiarity of the grasp to a part of the object, likely to reflect object ‘affordances’ and the end state comfort of the action.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bernstein N (1967) The coordination and regulation of movement. Pergamon Press, Oxford
Bub DN, Masson MEJ (2010) Grasping beer mugs: on the dynamics of alignment effects induced by handled objects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 36:341–358
Buhlmann I, Umilta C, Wascher E (2007) Response coding and visuomotor transformation in the Simon task: the role of action goals. JEPHP 33:1269–1282
Chainay H, Humphreys GW (2002) Neuropsychological evidence for a convergent route model for action. Cogn Neuropsychol 19(1):67–93
Churchland MM, C JP, Kafman MT, Foster JD, Nuyujukian P, Shenoy KV (2012) Neural population dynamics during reaching. Nature 487(7405):51–56
Cisek P (2005) Neural representations of motor plans, desired trajectories, and controlled objects. Cogn Process 6:15–24
Cisek P (2007) Cortical mechanisms for action selection: the affordance competition hypothesis. Philos Trans Royal Soc Lond B Biol Sci 362(1485):1585–1589
Cisek P, Kalaska JF (2005) Neural correlates of reaching decisions in dorsal premotor cortex: specifications of multiple direction choices and final selection of action. Neuron 45(5):801–814
Cisek P, Crammond DJ, Kalaska JF (2003) Neural activity in primary motor and dorsal premotor cortex in reaching tasks with the contralateral versus ipsilateral arm. J Neurophysiol 89(2):922–942
Creem SH, Proffitt DR (2001) Grasping objects by their handles: a necessary interaction between cognition and action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27(1):218–228
Ellis R, Tucker M (2000) Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects. Br J Psychol 91(Pt4):451–471
Fagg AH, Arbib MA (1998) Modeling parietal-premotor interactions in primate control of grasping. Neural Netw 11(7–8):1277–1303
Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton-Miffin, Boston
Goodale MA, Milner AD (1992) Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 15(1):20–25
Grafton ST, Hamilton AF (2007) Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain. Hum Mov Sci 26(4):590–616
Grezes J, Tucker M, Armony J, Ellis R, Passingham RE (2003) Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing. Eur J Neurosci 17(12):2735–2740
Harris CM, Wolpert DM (1998) Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394(6695):780–784
Henry FM (1952) Independence of reaction and movement times and equivalence of sensory motivators of faster response. Res Q Am Assoc For Health Phys Educ Recreat 23(1):43–53
Hopfield JJ (1982) Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proc Natl Acad Sci 79:2554–2558
Jeannerod M (1994) The representing brain: neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behav Brain Sci 17(2):187–202
Keele SW (1968) Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychol Bull 70:387–403
Kornblum S, Lee JW (1995) Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with response. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:855–875
McBride J, Sumner P, Jackson SR, Bajaj N, Husain M (2013) Exaggerated object affordance and absent automatic inhibition in alien limb syndrome. Cortex 49:2040–2054
Miall C, Wolpert D (1996) Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw 9(8):1265–1279
Mruczek RE, von Loga IS, Kastner S (2013) The representation of tool and non-tool object information in the human intraparietal sulcus. J Neurophysiol 109(12):2883–2896
Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9(1):97–113
Phillips JC, Ward R (2002) S-R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance: time course and specificity of response activation. Vis Cogn 9:540–558
Riddoch MJ, Humphreys GW, Price CJ (1989) Routes to action: evidence from apraxia. Cogn Neuropsychol 6(5):437–454
Riddoch MJ, Edwards MG, Humphreys GW, West R, Heafield T (1998) Visual affordances direct action: neuropsychological evidence from manual interference. Cogn Neuropsychol 15(6–8):645–683
Rosenbaum DA, Marchak F, Barnes HJ, Vaughan J, Slotta J, Jorgensen M (1990) Constraints for action selection: overhand versus underhand grips. In: Jeannerod M (ed) Attention and performance XIII: motor representation and control. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 231–274
Rosenbaum DA, V J, Barnes HJ, Jorgensen MJ (1992) Time course of movement planning: selection of handgrips for object manipulation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 18(5):1058–1075
Rosenbaum DA, van Heugten CM, Caldwell GE (1996) From cognition to biomechanics and back: the end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect. Acta Psychol 94(1):59–85
Rosenbaum DA, Cohen RG, Meulenbroeck RGJ, Vaughan J (2006) Plans for grasping objects. In: Latash ML, Lestienne FG (eds) Motor control and learning. Springer, New York, pp 9–25
Rosenbaum DA, Chapman KM, Weigelt M, Weiss DJ, van der Wel R (2012) Cognition, action, ad object manipulation. Psychol Bull 138(5):924–946
Rosenbaum DA, Herbort O, van der Wel R, Weiss DJ (2014) What’s in a grasp? Am Sci 102:366–373
Rothi LJG, Ochipa C, Heilman KM (1991) A cognitive neuropsychological model of limb apraxia. Cogn Neuropsychol 8:443–458
Rushworth MR, Ellison A, Walsh V (2001) Complementary localisation and lateralisation of orienting and motor attention. Nat Neurosci 4:656–661
Symes E, T M, Ellis R, Vainio L, Ottoboni G (2008) Grasp preparation improves change detection for congruent objects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 34(4):854–871
Tipper SP, Paul MA, Hayes AE (2006) Vision-for-action: the effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects. Psychon Bull Rev 13:492–498
Tucker M, Ellis R (1998) On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24(3):830–846
Ulrich R, Miller J (1994) Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis. J Exp Psychol Gen 123(1):34–80
van Polanen V, Davare M (2015) Interactions between dorsal and ventral streams for controlling skilled grasp. Neuropsychologia 79(PtB):186–191
Welford AT (1968) Fundamentals of skill. Methuen, London
Wilf M, Holmes NP, Schwartz I, Makin TR (2013) Dissociating between object affordances and spatial compatibility effects using early response components. Front Psychol 4:591
Wolpert DM (1997) Computational approaches to motor control. Trends Cogn Sci 1(6):209–216
Wong AL, Haith AM, Krakauer JW (2015) Motor planning. Neuroscientist 21(4):385–398
Zimmermann M, Meulenbroek RGJ, de Lange FP (2012) Motor planning is facilitated by adopting an action’s goal posture: an fMRI study. Cereb Cortex 22:122–131
Zimmermann M, Verhagen L, de Lange FP, Toni I (2016) The extrastriate body area computes desired goal states during action planning. eNeuro. doi:10.1523/ENEURO.0020-16.2016