Facilitating the use of non-standardin vivostudies in health risk assessment of chemicals: a proposal to improve evaluation criteria and reporting

Ågerstrand, 2011, Reporting and evaluation criteria as means towards a transparent use of ecotoxicity data for environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals, Environ. Pollut., 159, 2487, 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.06.023

Alcock, 2011, Understanding the mismatch between the demands of risk assessment and practice of scientists--the case of Deca-BDE, Environ. Int., 37, 216, 10.1016/j.envint.2010.06.002

Bero LA 2013 Tobacco industry manipulation of research Late Lessons from Early Warnings: Science, Precaution, Innovation 151 178 http://www.eea.europa.eu

Beronius, 2013, The influence of study design and sex-differences on results from developmental neurotoxicity studies of bisphenol A, implications for toxicity testing, Toxicology, 311, 13, 10.1016/j.tox.2013.02.012

Beronius, 2010, Risk to all or none? A comparative analysis of controversies in the health risk assessment of Bisphenol A, Reprod. Toxicol., 29, 132, 10.1016/j.reprotox.2009.11.007

Durda, 2000, Data quality evaluation of toxicological studies used to derive ecotoxicological benchmarks, Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess., 6, 747, 10.1080/10807030091124176

EC 2006 Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC

ECHA 2011a European Chemicals Agency. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Part B: Hazard assessment http://www.echa.europa.eu

ECHA 2011b European Chemicals Agency. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.4: Evaluation of available information http://www.echa.europa.eu

ECHA 2012 European Chemicals Agency. How to report robust study summaries http://www.echa.europa.eu

ECHA 2013 European Chemicals Agency http://www.echa.europa.eu

EFSA 2006 Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in Contact with Food on a request from the Commission related to 2,2-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)propane (bisphenol A) http://www.efsa.europa.eu

EFSA, 2010, European Food Safety Authority Guidance: Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making, EFSA Journal, 8, 90

Hengstler, 2011, Critical evaluation of key evidence on the human health hazards of exposure to bisphenol A, Crit. Rev. Toxicol., 41, 263, 10.3109/10408444.2011.558487

Hobbs, 2005, Evaluation of criteria used to assess the quality of aquatic toxicity data, Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag., 1, 174, 10.1897/2004-003R.1

Kilkenny, 2010, Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research, PLoS Biol., 8, e1000412, 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412

Klimisch, 1997, A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 25, 1, 10.1006/rtph.1996.1076

Kortenkamp A Martin O Faust M Evans R McKinlay R Orton F Rosivatz E 2012 State of the Art Assessment of Endocrine Disrupters - Final Report

Krimsky, 2005, The weight of scientific evidence in policy and law, Am. J. Public Health, 95, S129, 10.2105/AJPH.2004.044727

Küster, 2009, Regulatory demands on data quality for the environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 55, 276, 10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.07.005

Linkov, 2009, Weight-of-evidence evaluation in environmental assessment: review of qualitative and quantitative approaches, Sci. Total Environ., 407, 5199, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.05.004

Michaels, 2008, Doubt is Their Product: How Industry's Assault on Science Threatens Your Health

Myers, 2009, Why public health agencies cannot depend on good laboratory practices as a criterion for selecting data: the case of bisphenol A, Environ. Health Perspect., 117, 309, 10.1289/ehp.0800173

NTP 2008 National Toxicology Program Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction http://www.cerhr.niehs.nih.gov

OECD 2001 OECD Guideline for the testing of chemicals nr 416. Two-generation reproduction toxicity study http://www.OECD-ilibrary.org

OECD 2005 Manual for the assessment of chemicals. Chapter 3: Data evaluation http://www.oecd.org

OECD 2007 OECD Guideline for the testing of chemicals nr 426. Developmental neurotoxicity study http://www.OECD-ilibrary.org

OECD 2009a OECD Guideline for the testing of chemicals nr 451. Carcinogenicity studies http://www.OECD-ilibrary.org

OECD 2009b OECD Guideline for the testing of chemicals nr 452. Chronic toxicity studies http://www.OECD-ilibrary.org

OECD 2011 OECD Guideline for the testing of chemicals nr 443. Extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study http://www.OECD-ilibrary.org

Rudén, 2008, Evidence-based toxicology: " sound science" in new disguise, Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health, 14, 299, 10.1179/oeh.2008.14.4.299

Rudén, 2001, Interpretations of primary carcinogenicity data in 29 trichloroethylene risk assessments, Toxicology, 169, 209, 10.1016/S0300-483X(01)00525-X

SCENIHR 2012 Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks http://www.ec.europa.eu

Schneider, 2009, " ToxRTool" , a new tool to assess the reliability of toxicological data, Toxicol. Lett., 189, 138, 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.05.013

Simera, 2010, Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network, BMC Med., 8, 24, 10.1186/1741-7015-8-24

Tluczkiewicz, 2013, The OSIRIS Weight of Evidence approach: ITS for the endpoints repeated-dose toxicity (RepDose ITS), Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.02.004

US EPA 1999 Determining the adequacy of existing data http://www.usepa.gov

US NRC 2011 US National Research Council Institute for Animal Research http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13241

Wandall, 2004, Values in science and risk assessment, Toxicol. Lett., 152, 265, 10.1016/j.toxlet.2004.05.010

Weed, 2005, Weight of evidence: a review of concept and methods, Risk Anal., 25, 1545, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00699.x

Westerholm, 2014, Comparative analysis of toxicological evaluations for dermal exposure performed under two different EU regulatory frameworks, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 68, 51, 10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.11.006

Zoeller, 2012, Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and public health protection: a statement of principles from The Endocrine Society, Endocrinology, 153, 4097, 10.1210/en.2012-1422