Facebook rituals: Identifying rituals of social networking sites using structural ritualization theory

Journal of Consumer Behaviour - Tập 19 Số 2 - Trang 142-150 - 2020
Darrell E. Bartholomew1, Marlys J. Mason2
1School of Business Administration Penn State Harrisburg Middletown Pennsylvania USA
2Spears School of Business, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA

Tóm tắt

AbstractThis article applies structural ritualization theory (SRT) to identify different rituals and determine their importance in the daily lives of social networking sites (SNS) users, especially Facebook users. A mixed‐methods approach of in‐depth interviews and netnography viewed through the lens of SRT allowed us to identify and analyze the types of rituals users engaged in, and how these rituals impacted users and evolved over time. During customer journeys on the SNS of Facebook, users shared daily ritual practices in distinct behavioral stages. Production and consumption of these daily rituals are important to marketers in SNS platform design for building and maintaining connectivity between users and the SNS platform.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1086/429607

10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0006

Banks D. &Daus K.(2000).Are we there yet? The long winding road to online community. In: Business.

10.1093/jcr/ucx050

10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00408.x

10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x

10.1177/1555412014535663

10.1108/JOSM-07-2014-0170

Charmaz K., 2014, Constructing grounded theory

Cova B., 2006, Beyond marketing: in praise of societing

10.1108/03090560210423023

Durkheim E., 2014, The rules of sociological method: and selected texts on sociology and its method

Flick U., 2018, An introduction to qualitative research

10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.001

Fournier S., 2009, Getting brand communities right, Harvard Business Review, 87, 105

10.1080/1369118X.2014.987152

10.4324/9780203788387

10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.021

10.1002/cb.1499

10.1002/cb.1586

10.1192/bjp.131.2.185

10.4324/9781315632322

10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935

Lash S., 2002, Critique of information, 10.4135/9781446217283

Lawler E. J., 1992, Advances in group processes

10.1509/jm.15.0420

Luedicke M. K., 2006, Brand community under fire: The role of social environments for the HUMMER brand community, Advances in Consumer Research, 33, 486

10.1086/523291

10.1086/209048

Miller W. L., 2004, Depth interviewing, Approaches to Qualitative Research, 185

M‐W.com. (2012). Merriam‐Webster Online Dictionary. Retrieved fromhttp://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/debut

10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_2

Richtel M., 2010, Attached to technology and paying a price, The New York Times, 6

10.1086/208514

Simpson J. M., 2018, Virtual rituals: Community, emotion, and ritual in massive multiplayer online role‐playing games—A quantitative test and extension of structural ritualization theory, Socius, 4, 10.1177/2378023118779839

Steel E., 2011, Media: Advertisers wary of myspace, Wall Street Journal, B.7

Swartz J., 2008, Social‐networking sites work to turn users into profits, USA Today, 11

Toder‐Alon A., 2005, Online consumer psychology understanding and influencing consumer behavior in the virtual world, 7

10.1177/0163443712468605

10.1007/BF02819883